Inside the Black Box - Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ridley, N., & Kenefick, E. (2011, May). Research Shows the Effectiveness of Workforce Programs. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy. Roche, A. M., Pidd, K., & Freeman, T. (2009). Achieving professional practice change: From training to workforce development. Drug and Alcohol Review, 28, 550–557. Rothwell, W. J., Gerity, P. E., & Gaertner, E. A. (2004). Linking training to performance: A guide for workforce development professionals. Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges. Rynell, A. (2001, May). Help wanted: Low income single adult job seekers and the programs serving them. Chicago, IL: Mid-America Institute on Poverty Research and Policy. Sattar, S. (2010). Evidence scan of work experience programs. Oakland, CA: Mathematica Policy Research. Schochet, P. Z., Burghardt, J., & McConnell, S. (2008). Does Job Corps work Impact findings from the National Job Corps Study. American Economic Review, 98(5), 1864–86. Shore, R., & Shore, B. (2009, July). Increasing the number of children whose parents have stable employment (Kids Count Indicator Brief). Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Social Policy Research Associates and TATC Consulting. (2004). The Workforce Investment Act after five years: Results from the National Evaluation of the Implementation of WIA. Oakland, CA: Social Policy Research Associates. Strawn, J. (2010a). Shifting gears: State innovation to advance adult workers and the economy in the Midwest. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy. Retrieved from http://www.clasp.org/admin/site/publications/files/ShiftingGearsStateInnovationstoAdvanceWorkersa ndtheEconomyintheMidwest0710.pdf Strawn, J. (2010b, April 22). The role of education and training in the TANF program. Testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy. Strawn, J., & Martinson, K. (2000). Steady work and better jobs: How to help low-income parents sustain employment and advance in the workforce. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy. Tate, P., & Klein-Collins, R. (2004). Establishing high-performance workforce development organizations. In W. J. Rothwell, P. E. Gerity, & E. A. Gaertner (Eds.), Linking training to performance: A guide for workforce development professionals (pp. 15-24). Washington, DC: Community College Press. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 88
The Workforce Boards of Metropolitan Chicago. (2010, May). Improving the skills of our current workforce (Workforce Indicator Report 08). Chicago, IL: Author. U. S. Government Accountability Office. (2009, February). Labor has made progress in addressing areas of concern, but more focus needed on understanding what works and what doesn’t. (Publication No. GAO-09-36T). Retrieved from http://www.gpoaccess.gov/gaoreports/index.html U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee. (2011, August). Addressing long-term unemployment after the Great Recession: The crucial role of workforce training. Retrieved from http://jec.senate.gov/public/a=Files.Serve&File_id=97c2e98e-a791-47fc-a324-6b407948e083 U.S. Department of Labor. (2009). Workforce Investment Act (WIA) performance measures. Retrieved March 6, 2012, from http://www.doleta.gov/performance/quickview/WIAPMeasures.cfm. U.S. Department of Labor. (unknown).Work experience and career exploration program. Retrieved December 8, 2010, from http://www.dol.gov/elaws/esa/flsa/docs/wecep.asp Uhalde, R (2011). Workforce development that supports economic development. The IEDC Economic Development Journal, 10(1), 42-49. Uhalde, R., & Kazis, R. (2010, August). The community college and career training grant program: Lessons learned from the field and recommendations. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future. Wilson, B. (2005). Integrated Performance Information (IPI) for workforce development: A blueprint for states. Olympia, WA: Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board. Zedlewski, S. R., Holcomb, P. A., & Loprest, P. J. (2007). Hard-to-employ parents: A review of their characteristics and the programs designed to serve their needs. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 89
Page 1 and 2:
Inside the Black Box: What Makes Wo
Page 3 and 4:
Acknowledgments We would like to th
Page 5 and 6:
Policy and Advocacy Efforts .......
Page 7 and 8:
Executive Summary The workforce dev
Page 9 and 10:
1. Interface with other required da
Page 11 and 12:
While acknowledging funding as a pr
Page 13 and 14:
Introduction The workforce developm
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 1: Interaction of Influences
Page 17 and 18:
Review of Recent Literature A revie
Page 19 and 20:
development system and found that i
Page 21 and 22:
for contributing to program success
Page 23 and 24:
capture all of the participants’
Page 25 and 26:
The organizations also reported tha
Page 27 and 28:
that needs to be collected. Another
Page 29 and 30:
Recommendation 2: Develop longitudi
Page 31 and 32:
seldom systematically collected by
Page 33 and 34:
With regard to the planning and dev
Page 35 and 36:
models in order to best serve their
Page 37 and 38:
organizations are interested in col
Page 39 and 40:
Poor attitude, poor work history, o
Page 41 and 42:
Organizations often use a wide rang
Page 43 and 44: …a more holistic approach to work
Page 45 and 46: in the industry. Professional crede
Page 47 and 48: Success Factors: Workforce Provider
Page 49 and 50: education or no work experience. Ot
Page 51 and 52: equirements. As part of these effor
Page 53 and 54: given as the reason organizations d
Page 55 and 56: passion to see, to transform this c
Page 57 and 58: permanent job opportunities. These
Page 59 and 60: Meet the Needs of Participants Many
Page 61 and 62: participant is linked to an opening
Page 63 and 64: Provide Business Services to Engage
Page 65 and 66: The organizations in the study all
Page 67 and 68: community, such as the services the
Page 69 and 70: depend more heavily on other fundin
Page 71 and 72: Sometimes a legislation that is out
Page 73 and 74: on the participants they serve. Als
Page 75 and 76: Community engagement is also essent
Page 77 and 78: Website Description Length of Progr
Page 79 and 80: Eligibility Participants Served Par
Page 81 and 82: Participants Served ninth grade lev
Page 83 and 84: Length of Program Size of Program E
Page 85 and 86: Size of Program Eligibility Partici
Page 87 and 88: Eligibility Participants Served Ind
Page 89 and 90: Bragg, D.D., Kim, E., & Barnett, E.
Page 91 and 92: Herr, T., & Wagner, S. L. (2007). B
Page 93: NGA Center for Best Practices, Nati
Page 97 and 98: The qualitative design of this proj
Page 99: 1313 East 60th Street Chicago, IL 6
show all

Inside the Black Box - Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?