Simplification is the key - Centre for Policy Studies

More documents

Recommendations

Info

More specifically, employers are now seeking positive emotional engagement by satisfying their employees’ desire for flexibility, which means going further than simply offering to match employee contributions to group DC schemes. “Flexible benefits” programmes are being offered, which allow employees to direct employer contributions to benefits other than pensions (and buy or sell benefit components). At least two major employers (both are banks) are currently replacing their schemes’ “pensions” label with “creation of wealth for retirement”. They are offering platforms that include an ISA and a SIPP to receive the cash proceeds of maturing employee share plans (SAYE plans and options), alongside Group DC schemes. Employee feedback has indicated that they like the portability of products, such as ISAs, that are not part of an occupational pension scheme, partly because they are not accompanied with the risk of a transfer value “haircut” when moving jobs. But many employees say that they miss the inherent paternalism that accompanies a scheme. The employer response to this has been to offer guidance to understanding outcomes, for example forecasts of what employees may expect to receive in retirement from a range of differently risked investments (e.g. low, medium, high). Employers, subject to commercial pressures, are ahead of government in responding imaginatively to savers’ needs. One initiative that the Government could take would be to allow scheme sponsors to formally re-characterise their pension schemes as lifestyle savings schemes, which is what they are becoming. Ideally this could be achieved without unhelpful interference, such as a reduction in trustees’ flexibility and loss of control over schemes. 29
4. THE PENSIONS AND SAVINGS INDUSTRY’S PERSPECTIVE 4.1 Desperate for change “Today’s retirement income model is not fit for purpose; it’s not working for anybody.” 82 “We, the actuarial profession, are working in a pensions environment that is broken. We all want something to happen.” 83 “Why would a basic rate taxpayer want to save in a pension framework? It’s an expensive, inflexible vehicle relative to today’s market; just open an ISA, start early and make sure you use it every year.” 84 These are some of the sentiments expressed to the author by people who earn their living from within the pensions and savings industry. The industry, under pressure from increasing longevity, poor investment performance and increasing costs (administration, compliance and regulation), is ready for change. It is well aware that overwhelming complexity deters savers, and less saving means smaller business volumes. The only beneficiaries of complexity are the providers of advisory services. 4.2 Two businesses, one client base The long-term savings industry is characterised by a fundamental schism: two differently taxed businesses (pensions and savings) are competing for the attention of one population of long-term savers. Even within an insurance company, for example, savers (“policy holders”) with units in a life fund (with an embedded life protection policy) face a different tax regime to other insurance company funds (although the underlying assets are often the same). As Chapter 2 illustrated, taxation is one of the roots of the complexity that defines the UK’s retirement savings arena. 82 83 84 A director of a FTSE 100 insurer, 23 November 2009. A senior pensions actuary at a major consultancy, 18 November 2009. A director of one of the UK’s leading life and pensions IT consultancies, 4 December 2009. 30
Page 1 and 2: Simplification is the key Stimulati
Page 3 and 4: THE AUTHOR Michael Johnson trained
Page 5 and 6: A note concerning data Finding a co
Page 7 and 8: These proposals depend upon having
Page 9 and 10: SUMMARY The UK’s long-term savin
Page 11 and 12: any annuitisation requirement, prov
Page 13 and 14: Thus, had pension savings products
Page 16 and 17: INTRODUCTION There has been a flood
Page 18 and 19: PART ONE: THE LONG-TERM SAVINGS LAN
Page 20 and 21: Japan’s savings ratio was once th
Page 22 and 23: scheme contribution rates are lower
Page 24 and 25: Table 1: Funded pension scheme asse
Page 26 and 27: 1.9 The international perspective A
Page 28 and 29: Table 4: ISA savers’ income distr
Page 30 and 31: Table 6: The complexity of the tax
Page 32 and 33: Figure 4: Income options upon retir
Page 34 and 35: savings by delivering a framework t
Page 36 and 37: Figure 7: When non-savers might sta
Page 38 and 39: There are other aspects to consider
Page 40 and 41: 3. THE EMPLOYERS’ PERSPECTIVE 3.1
Page 42 and 43: When employees with DC funds retire
Page 46 and 47: Both businesses do have important c
Page 48 and 49: year. 91 Clearly, there are conside
Page 50 and 51: elderly and the wealthy, not least
Page 52 and 53: 5. THE TREASURY’S PERSPECTIVE 5.1
Page 54 and 55: Whilst the UK’s NRR for the mean
Page 56 and 57: Currently, reducing pensioner pover
Page 58 and 59: Table 13: Net cost of tax relief un
Page 60 and 61: TEE would be hugely attractive to p
Page 62 and 63: 5.6 Tax treatment: international pe
Page 64 and 65: PART II THE PROPOSALS AND THEIR IMP
Page 66 and 67: Proposal 6: post-retirement, amend
Page 68 and 69: 7. TAX SIMPLIFICATION: SOME OPTIONS
Page 70 and 71: 8. THE IMPLICATIONS FOR SAVERS Impl
Page 72 and 73: The higher rate taxpayers’ perspe
Page 74 and 75: segregated from any employer-sponso
Page 76 and 77: epresent a further step down the pa
Page 78 and 79: 10. THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PENSIO
Page 80 and 81: Such principles would have to ensur
Page 82 and 83: Figure 13: The cost of pension savi
Page 84 and 85: pool of underlying pension assets (
Page 86 and 87: hardship” facility, whereby cash
Page 88 and 89: occupational pension scheme benefit
Page 90 and 91: CONCLUSION We would save more, for
Page 92 and 93: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This paper was cat
Page 94 and 95:
APPENDIX I Summary of proposals fro
Page 96 and 97:
APPENDIX II Value of assets in priv
Page 98 and 99:
depending upon age at the time that
Page 100 and 101:
APPENDIX V PRE-RETIREMENT ACCESS TO
Page 102 and 103:
APPENDIX VII FINANCIAL PLANNING TOO
Page 104 and 105:
APPENDIX VIII THE MODEL 173 The
Page 106 and 107:
GLOSSARY Alternatively Secured Pens
Page 108 and 109:
pensions and earnings, but excludes
Page 110 and 111:
those with earnings above £4,940 b
Page 112 and 113:
in cash terms, i.e. fixed at £770
Page 114:
The UK savings industry is barely t
show all

Simplification is the key - Centre for Policy Studies

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?