28.04.2015 Views

Simplification is the key - Centre for Policy Studies

Simplification is the key - Centre for Policy Studies

Simplification is the key - Centre for Policy Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FOREWORD<br />

Th<strong>is</strong> paper should be welcome by everyone interested in <strong>the</strong> future of savings and<br />

pensions in <strong>the</strong> UK, <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> clarity of its analys<strong>is</strong> and practical solutions <strong>for</strong> encouraging a<br />

stronger savings culture.<br />

Few doubt that our current complex system of products and tax structures <strong>is</strong> in urgent<br />

need of re<strong>for</strong>m. The UK used to boast strong pension prov<strong>is</strong>ion <strong>for</strong> many of those in<br />

work, based on <strong>the</strong> old final salary “defined benefit, DB” occupational pension schemes.<br />

However th<strong>is</strong> pattern did not typically work well <strong>for</strong> women, who often had less cons<strong>is</strong>tent<br />

employment. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore as <strong>the</strong>se schemes have become unaf<strong>for</strong>dable, <strong>the</strong> weight of<br />

future retirement prov<strong>is</strong>ion has shifted towards <strong>the</strong> building up of personal investment<br />

pots, much of th<strong>is</strong> through direct contribution pension schemes. Without <strong>the</strong> guarantee<br />

of a final salary match, <strong>the</strong> r<strong>is</strong>k has transferred to <strong>the</strong> individual and <strong>the</strong> attraction of<br />

pensions has reduced. Take up rates in group schemes are not much higher than 50%,<br />

suggesting that many people consider <strong>the</strong> tax relief insufficient incentive to persuade<br />

<strong>the</strong>m to tie up <strong>the</strong>ir savings in a long-term fund where <strong>the</strong>y have limited access prior<br />

purchasing an annuity in retirement. Recent tax changes have compounded doubts<br />

about <strong>the</strong> value and permanence of <strong>the</strong> tax relief.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> same time, new savings vehicles, ISAs, with a different, simpler structure of tax<br />

relief and much greater flexibility, have been growing in popularity. Yet, although <strong>for</strong><br />

many people <strong>the</strong>y can be an equally effective way of providing tax incentives <strong>for</strong><br />

retirement income, <strong>the</strong> current regime severely limits ISA savings and treats ISAs and<br />

pension savings under entirely separate rules.<br />

Th<strong>is</strong> paper sets out a number of important and practical proposals to end th<strong>is</strong> artificial<br />

complexity and bring all long-term retirement savings toge<strong>the</strong>r into a simpler lifetime<br />

savings account. The resultant structure would be simpler and more attractive <strong>for</strong> savers.<br />

It would be welcomed by many in <strong>the</strong> industry as a way of streamlining <strong>the</strong>ir marketing<br />

and admin<strong>is</strong>tration processes. And <strong>for</strong> government it offers <strong>the</strong> prospect of helping build<br />

a stronger long-term savings culture without increasing, and potentially reducing, <strong>the</strong><br />

immediate tax cost of savings incentives.<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!