28.04.2015 Views

Simplification is the key - Centre for Policy Studies

Simplification is the key - Centre for Policy Studies

Simplification is the key - Centre for Policy Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proposal 6: post-retirement, amend access to pension savings<br />

Savers should be free to draw down <strong>the</strong>ir pension savings assets as required (taxed<br />

conventionally at <strong>the</strong> saver’s highest rate), without an annuit<strong>is</strong>ation requirement, provided<br />

that a minimum of £50,000 133 of investments (at <strong>the</strong> SPA) <strong>is</strong> not accessed until <strong>the</strong> age of 75.<br />

Savers who have already secured an income equivalent to 40% of median earnings, say,<br />

from <strong>the</strong> State Pension, lifetime annuities or guaranteed private pensions, should be exempt.<br />

Proposal 7: annuities purchased with ISA funds should be tax-free<br />

Annuities purchased with ISA-derived funds should be exempt from income tax,<br />

cons<strong>is</strong>tent with <strong>the</strong> tax-exempt status of withdrawals from ISAs.<br />

Proposal 8: permit pension savings flexibility within couples<br />

To avoid <strong>the</strong> income-in-retirement d<strong>is</strong>advantage often suffered by women, couples 134<br />

should be able to contribute to one ano<strong>the</strong>r’s pension savings irrespective of <strong>the</strong><br />

recipient’s earned income. Tax relief should be granted at <strong>the</strong> contributor’s marginal rate,<br />

limited to <strong>the</strong> amount of tax paid in aggregate by <strong>the</strong> couple in that year. To limit <strong>the</strong><br />

Treasury’s tax relief cost, intra-couple contributions should be deducted from <strong>the</strong> annual<br />

limit of both parties. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, assets should be transferable between <strong>the</strong> couple’s<br />

pension savings, but without tax relief.<br />

Proposal 9: encourage wealth transfer into pension savings<br />

Contributions to pension savings could be permitted without being supported by<br />

earnings, <strong>for</strong> example up to a limit of £400,000, divided into two sub-limits.<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

£200,000 Primary Residence Limit, from proceeds of <strong>the</strong> sale of <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

residence; and<br />

£200,000 Business Sale Limit, from proceeds of <strong>the</strong> sale of a business.<br />

Contributions made within <strong>the</strong>se limits should fall outside of capital gains and<br />

inheritance tax limits (and <strong>the</strong> seven year rule should not apply), but <strong>the</strong>y should not<br />

attract tax relief. Each limit should be subject to review every five years, say; <strong>the</strong> Primary<br />

Residence Limit could, <strong>for</strong> example, be indexed to average house prices.<br />

Proposal 10: inter-generational wealth transfer between pension savings upon<br />

death, free of inheritance tax<br />

Savers should be able to bequeath unused pension savings assets to third parties free<br />

of inheritance tax (perhaps limited to £100,000), provided that <strong>the</strong> assets only go into<br />

recipients’ pension savings. Such bequests should not attract tax relief.<br />

133 After deducting <strong>the</strong> 25% tax-free lump sum that <strong>the</strong>y are entitled to withdraw (net of any pre-SPA tax-free<br />

withdrawal), as per Proposal 5.<br />

134 Including civil partnerships.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!