Simplification is the key - Centre for Policy Studies
Simplification is the key - Centre for Policy Studies
Simplification is the key - Centre for Policy Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Proposal 6: post-retirement, amend access to pension savings<br />
Savers should be free to draw down <strong>the</strong>ir pension savings assets as required (taxed<br />
conventionally at <strong>the</strong> saver’s highest rate), without an annuit<strong>is</strong>ation requirement, provided<br />
that a minimum of £50,000 133 of investments (at <strong>the</strong> SPA) <strong>is</strong> not accessed until <strong>the</strong> age of 75.<br />
Savers who have already secured an income equivalent to 40% of median earnings, say,<br />
from <strong>the</strong> State Pension, lifetime annuities or guaranteed private pensions, should be exempt.<br />
Proposal 7: annuities purchased with ISA funds should be tax-free<br />
Annuities purchased with ISA-derived funds should be exempt from income tax,<br />
cons<strong>is</strong>tent with <strong>the</strong> tax-exempt status of withdrawals from ISAs.<br />
Proposal 8: permit pension savings flexibility within couples<br />
To avoid <strong>the</strong> income-in-retirement d<strong>is</strong>advantage often suffered by women, couples 134<br />
should be able to contribute to one ano<strong>the</strong>r’s pension savings irrespective of <strong>the</strong><br />
recipient’s earned income. Tax relief should be granted at <strong>the</strong> contributor’s marginal rate,<br />
limited to <strong>the</strong> amount of tax paid in aggregate by <strong>the</strong> couple in that year. To limit <strong>the</strong><br />
Treasury’s tax relief cost, intra-couple contributions should be deducted from <strong>the</strong> annual<br />
limit of both parties. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, assets should be transferable between <strong>the</strong> couple’s<br />
pension savings, but without tax relief.<br />
Proposal 9: encourage wealth transfer into pension savings<br />
Contributions to pension savings could be permitted without being supported by<br />
earnings, <strong>for</strong> example up to a limit of £400,000, divided into two sub-limits.<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
£200,000 Primary Residence Limit, from proceeds of <strong>the</strong> sale of <strong>the</strong> primary<br />
residence; and<br />
£200,000 Business Sale Limit, from proceeds of <strong>the</strong> sale of a business.<br />
Contributions made within <strong>the</strong>se limits should fall outside of capital gains and<br />
inheritance tax limits (and <strong>the</strong> seven year rule should not apply), but <strong>the</strong>y should not<br />
attract tax relief. Each limit should be subject to review every five years, say; <strong>the</strong> Primary<br />
Residence Limit could, <strong>for</strong> example, be indexed to average house prices.<br />
Proposal 10: inter-generational wealth transfer between pension savings upon<br />
death, free of inheritance tax<br />
Savers should be able to bequeath unused pension savings assets to third parties free<br />
of inheritance tax (perhaps limited to £100,000), provided that <strong>the</strong> assets only go into<br />
recipients’ pension savings. Such bequests should not attract tax relief.<br />
133 After deducting <strong>the</strong> 25% tax-free lump sum that <strong>the</strong>y are entitled to withdraw (net of any pre-SPA tax-free<br />
withdrawal), as per Proposal 5.<br />
134 Including civil partnerships.<br />
51