A critical analysis of the Modernists and the Hadeeth ... - Islam House

On page, 356-57 he writes,
"The first thing that is examined in judging a narration is
the status of the narrators. In this regard, each and every
narrator is examined through various manners, whether he
is a liar, careless in narrating narrations, sinner or heretic,
dubious or weak in his memory, whether his condition is
unknown or his condition is known. By all these conditions
the status of the narrators were examined by the
Muhadditheen, and they thus presented a glorious
collection on Asmaa' ar-Rijaal (the study of the narrators)
which are beyond doubt invaluable. But what amongst this
is not prone to mistakes? Firstly, it is difficult to accurately
know the biography of the narrators, their memory and
their other inner qualities. Secondly, those people
themselves who formed an opinion about them were not
free from human weaknesses. Nafs (desires) accompany
everyone and there is a strong possibility that personal
opinions interfered in forming an opinion, good or bad,
about individuals…"
Clarification
Firstly: The science of hadeeth and isnads (chains of narrators) is one
of the special characteristics of this ummah. No other
nation paid attention as this ummah did to the
chains of narration through which their books
and their religion were transmitted. This is
why the texts of other nations were
subjected to distortions and fabrications,
and it became impossible for them to
- 131 -