A critical analysis of the Modernists and the Hadeeth ... - Islam House
A critical analysis of the Modernists and the Hadeeth ... - Islam House
A critical analysis of the Modernists and the Hadeeth ... - Islam House
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Hadeeth</strong>-rejecters come in different orientations…<br />
1. Some reject <strong>Hadeeth</strong> bluntly like Rashad Khaleefah. (*1)<br />
2. Some do not reject Ahadeeth outright but reduce its status to<br />
mere tradition <strong>and</strong> fables, <strong>and</strong> only approve Ahadeeth that <strong>the</strong>y<br />
see as consistent to <strong>the</strong>ir underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Qur'aan like<br />
Ghulam Parvez.(*2)<br />
(*1) Rashad Khaleefah was an Egyptian immigrant to <strong>the</strong> U. S. who claimed to have<br />
discovered a ma<strong>the</strong>matical pattern involving '<strong>the</strong> number 19’ <strong>and</strong> its multiples<br />
throughout <strong>the</strong> Qur’aan. He claimed this discovery was a miracle that comes from<br />
Messengers, <strong>and</strong> he declared Messengership on this basis.<br />
His infatuation with <strong>the</strong> number 19 led him to reject two verses from <strong>the</strong><br />
Qur’aan that did not fit his calculation (i.e. verses 9:128-129).<br />
He claimed that <strong>the</strong> Prophet � had no function except to deliver <strong>the</strong> Qur’aan<br />
<strong>and</strong> so, he did not explain or interpret it.<br />
Rashad Khaleefah rejected hadeeth outright, <strong>and</strong> declared anyone who<br />
testifies to ‘ Muhammad-ar-RasoolAllah’<br />
in <strong>the</strong> Kalimah as a mushrik.<br />
As for <strong>the</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong> Rashad Khalifa’s number 19 research, Dr Bilal Philips<br />
mentions, “Many Muslims at first received Khalifa’s <strong>the</strong>ories with un<strong>critical</strong><br />
enthusiasm. However, when more rigorous critics began checking his numbers, <strong>the</strong>y<br />
found numerous discrepancies <strong>and</strong> some outright fabrica-tions in his data.<br />
His claims were based on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> times a given letter or word occurs<br />
in a given soorah or group <strong>of</strong> soorahs. It was discovered that he would sometimes treat<br />
hamzahs like alifs <strong>and</strong> sometimes he wouldn’t, depending on <strong>the</strong> totals he needed in a<br />
given soorah to confirm his <strong>the</strong>ory. Sometimes he counted letters that weren’t <strong>the</strong>re,<br />
sometimes he failed to count existing letters, sometimes he counted two words as one,<br />
sometimes he added to <strong>the</strong> Qur’aanic text <strong>and</strong> sometimes he deleted from it, all for <strong>the</strong><br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> making <strong>the</strong> letter <strong>and</strong> word counts conform to his <strong>the</strong>ory.” [For more<br />
details see <strong>the</strong> book, “The Quran’s Numerical Miracle: Hoax <strong>and</strong> Heresy” by Dr. Bilal<br />
Philips]<br />
(*2) Gulam Parvez was a government civil servant in pre-partition India, <strong>and</strong> later<br />
worked in <strong>the</strong> Pakistan Central Government. He was <strong>the</strong> founder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tolu-e-<strong>Islam</strong><br />
Trust <strong>and</strong> authored many books to forward his ideas <strong>of</strong> hadeeth rejection.<br />
- 68 -