2.1 AustraliaIn <strong>the</strong> past, Australia’s energy policy focused primarily on <strong>the</strong> supply side (IEA, 2005).However, <strong>the</strong> government has aggressively pursued energy efficiency <strong>in</strong> recent years. In2004, <strong>the</strong> government published a widely quoted white paper entitled “Secur<strong>in</strong>gAustralia’s <strong>Energy</strong> Future,” which <strong>in</strong>cluded an exam<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> potential of energyefficiency <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g energy <strong>in</strong>tensity and carbon emissions. The white paper announcedseveral <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> expansion of <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>Energy</strong> PerformanceStandards to cover build<strong>in</strong>gs and more appliances (Australian Government, 2009; IEA,2005).With participation from all levels of <strong>the</strong> Australian government and from representativesof <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry, <strong>the</strong> Australian Build<strong>in</strong>g Codes Board was officially founded by<strong>the</strong> Australian Commonwealth, state and territory governments <strong>in</strong> 1994 and reaffirmed <strong>in</strong>2006. Key objectives of Australian Build<strong>in</strong>g Codes Board <strong>in</strong>clude: 1) ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g andupdat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> BCA, 2) provid<strong>in</strong>g regulations to “aid <strong>the</strong> design, construction and use ofbuild<strong>in</strong>gs throughout Australia,” and 3) support<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> governmental agenda on suchissues as relat<strong>in</strong>g to climate change (ABCB, 2008).The BCA offers technical provisions <strong>in</strong> one cod<strong>in</strong>g manual for <strong>the</strong> design andconstruction of build<strong>in</strong>gs and o<strong>the</strong>r structures throughout Australia and allows forvariations by climate zone. It covers structure, fire resistance, services, equipment, energyefficiency and certa<strong>in</strong> aspects of health and amenities. <strong>Energy</strong> efficiency measures were<strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> BCA <strong>in</strong> January 2003. On energy efficiency, <strong>the</strong> code allows forei<strong>the</strong>r a performance-based approach to compliance (compared to a reference build<strong>in</strong>g),or a prescriptive approach based on requirements for specific build<strong>in</strong>g components.S<strong>in</strong>ce 2003, <strong>the</strong> BCA has been updated annually. This report was written based on BCA2007; <strong>the</strong> most recent version is BCA 2009.2.2 CanadaNatural Resources Canada is <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> department of <strong>the</strong> Canadian governmentresponsible for natural resources and energy. It has promoted energy efficiency and <strong>the</strong>use of alternative energy s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> late 1970s. Natural Resources Canada’s policy<strong>in</strong>struments <strong>in</strong>clude: regulation, f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>centives, leadership, <strong>in</strong>formation, voluntary<strong>in</strong>itiatives, research and development fund<strong>in</strong>g, and technology demonstrations (OEE,2006, 2009) The Office of <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong> of Natural Resources Canada, established <strong>in</strong>1998, undertakes market transformation <strong>in</strong>itiatives to improve energy efficiency. TheOffice of <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong> has <strong>in</strong>itiated many <strong>in</strong>fluential projects and policies topromote build<strong>in</strong>g energy efficiency.Canada approved its first comprehensive law on energy efficiency, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Efficiency</strong>Act, <strong>in</strong> 1992. 19 This act gives <strong>the</strong> Government of Canada <strong>the</strong> authority to make andenforce regulations related to performance and label<strong>in</strong>g requirements for energy-19 A document entitled “Measures for <strong>Energy</strong> Conservation <strong>in</strong> Build<strong>in</strong>gs” was published <strong>in</strong> 1978 and usedas a guidel<strong>in</strong>e for federal and o<strong>the</strong>r government build<strong>in</strong>gs, but <strong>the</strong> document was not written or published <strong>in</strong>code language.24
consum<strong>in</strong>g products (as well as doors and w<strong>in</strong>dows). The act only applies to products thatare imported or shipped between prov<strong>in</strong>ces. The act also authorizes <strong>the</strong> Government ofCanada to collect statistics on energy use and alternative energy (OEE, 2006, 2009).Currently, Canada has seven national build<strong>in</strong>g codes 20 , two of which, MNECB andMNECH, relate to build<strong>in</strong>g energy efficiency. The Canadian Commission on Build<strong>in</strong>gand Fire Codes, funded by code sales and <strong>the</strong> National Research Council, is responsiblefor develop<strong>in</strong>g and updat<strong>in</strong>g six of <strong>the</strong> model national codes.The Canadian Commission on Build<strong>in</strong>g and Fire Codes prepared both MNECB andMNECH, and National Research Council first published <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong> 1997. National ResearchCouncil, Natural Resources Canada, <strong>the</strong> Canadian Electricity Association, and <strong>the</strong>prov<strong>in</strong>cial and territorial m<strong>in</strong>istries of energy funded <strong>the</strong> research to develop <strong>the</strong> modelcode and <strong>the</strong> support<strong>in</strong>g software. MNECB and MNECH were heavily <strong>in</strong>fluenced byASHRAE 90.1-1989.In April 2008, National Research Council and Natural Resources Canada announced that<strong>the</strong>y were jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g forces to update MNECB. Natural Resources Canada is provid<strong>in</strong>gtechnical expertise and up to $5 million to support this <strong>in</strong>itiative. National ResearchCouncil will publish <strong>the</strong> new energy code <strong>in</strong> 2011. The new code will complement <strong>the</strong>next version of <strong>the</strong> model national construction codes, which are scheduled forpublication <strong>in</strong> 2010 (NRC, 2008).2.3 Ch<strong>in</strong>aBuild<strong>in</strong>g energy efficiency issues <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a have drawn <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g attention from <strong>the</strong>government s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> mid-1980s, when Ch<strong>in</strong>a began its large-scale construction <strong>in</strong> urbanareas (Huang, 2008). Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s first <strong>Energy</strong> Conservation Law (released <strong>in</strong> 1997)addressed <strong>the</strong> importance of build<strong>in</strong>g energy codes <strong>in</strong> one of its 50 Articles. The revised<strong>Energy</strong> Conservation Law, released <strong>in</strong> 2007, has a separate Section 21 on Construction<strong>Energy</strong> Conservation, which <strong>in</strong>cludes seven articles directly or <strong>in</strong>directly related to buildenergy codes.The National Development and Reform Commission, <strong>the</strong> powerful adm<strong>in</strong>istrative entity<strong>in</strong> charge of Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s macroeconomic policies and development, issued <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a Mediumand Long-Term <strong>Energy</strong> Conservation Plan <strong>in</strong> 2004. The Plan revealed ambitious energyconservation targets for build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a: “Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Eleventh Five-year Plan period,new build<strong>in</strong>gs should be strictly subject to <strong>the</strong> design standard of 50% energyconservation. Several major cities such as Beij<strong>in</strong>g and Tianj<strong>in</strong> shall take a lead <strong>in</strong>implement<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 65% energy-sav<strong>in</strong>g standard. Reform of heat supply system shall becarried out <strong>in</strong> a full scale. In Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s large and medium cities, a charge system based on<strong>the</strong>rmal meter will be widely spread <strong>in</strong> district heat<strong>in</strong>g of residential and public build<strong>in</strong>gs;20 The o<strong>the</strong>r build<strong>in</strong>g codes are <strong>the</strong> 1) National Build<strong>in</strong>g Code of Canada, 2) National Fire Code of Canada,3) National Plumb<strong>in</strong>g Code of Canada, 4) National Farm Build<strong>in</strong>g Code, and 5) National Hous<strong>in</strong>g Codeand Illustrated Guide.21 The sections under Chapter III Rational Use of <strong>Energy</strong> Conservation <strong>in</strong>clude: Section 1 GeneralProvisions, Section 2 Industrial <strong>Energy</strong> Conservation, Section 3 Construction <strong>Energy</strong> Conservation, Section4 Transport <strong>Energy</strong> Conservation, Section 5 <strong>Energy</strong> Conservation by Public Institutions and Section 6<strong>Energy</strong> Conservation by Key <strong>Energy</strong> Consum<strong>in</strong>g Entities.25
- Page 1 and 2: PNNL-122267Shaping the Energy Effic
- Page 3: Shaping the Energy Efficiency in Ne
- Page 6 and 7: efficient air conditioning system,
- Page 8 and 9: ContentsForeword ..................
- Page 10 and 11: List of TablesTable 1 GDP, Primary
- Page 12 and 13: ForewordBuildings account for about
- Page 14 and 15: 1 Introduction and Background1.1 Im
- Page 16 and 17: esidential buildings in 2006, with
- Page 18 and 19: JAP 1. Criteria for Clients on the
- Page 20 and 21: can significantly increase energy d
- Page 22 and 23: f) South Korea’s building energy
- Page 26 and 27: small cities will be pilot of such
- Page 28 and 29: (DCGREUH) issued by the Ministry of
- Page 30 and 31: according to the current codes. Thi
- Page 32 and 33: Table 7 Structural Comparison of Bu
- Page 34 and 35: 3.3 Building EnvelopeKey Findings A
- Page 36 and 37: JAPCCREUH1999KORBDCES2008USAASHRAE9
- Page 38 and 39: This study selects the midpoint sco
- Page 40 and 41: MiamiUSA0.36(Insulationabove deck)t
- Page 42 and 43: Six countries have jurisdictions in
- Page 44 and 45: thermal requirements for roofs, flo
- Page 46 and 47: Figure 6 Maximum U-factors in Resid
- Page 48 and 49: Table 16 HVAC in Japan’s Building
- Page 50 and 51: ItemsService water heating refers t
- Page 52 and 53: Water conservation Canada has manda
- Page 54 and 55: practice (MNECB 1997). India sets m
- Page 56 and 57: Canada and India adopt compliance p
- Page 58 and 59: Japan only supervises the building
- Page 60 and 61: 4.2 Testing and RatingKey Findings
- Page 62 and 63: Other commonly used tools among APP
- Page 64 and 65: CAN 55MNECH1997CHNINDECBCJAPCanadia
- Page 66 and 67: and local jurisdiction contact info
- Page 68 and 69: certifying third-party verifiers or
- Page 70 and 71: Point of ControlIncentives for Comp
- Page 72 and 73: Point of ControlIncentives for Comp
- Page 74 and 75:
AUS,continuedCANTesting Agencies an
- Page 76 and 77:
CAN,continuedCHNTesting Agencies an
- Page 78 and 79:
Testing Agencies and Certification
- Page 80 and 81:
USA,continuedTesting Agencies and C
- Page 82 and 83:
Appendix C - Compliance SoftwareAUS
- Page 84 and 85:
CANMNECB1997,continuedSoftwareMetho
- Page 86 and 87:
USAIECC 2006,continuedSoftwareMetho
- Page 88 and 89:
AUSBCA 2007,continuedCANMNECB1997CA
- Page 90 and 91:
JAP,ContinuedKORUSAASHRAE90.1-2007T
- Page 92 and 93:
AcronymsAPPAS/NZSASHRAEAUSBATFBCABD
- Page 94 and 95:
ReferencesABCB (Australian Building
- Page 96 and 97:
IEA (International Energy Agency).
- Page 98:
OEE. 2008. Energy Use Data Handbook