JAPCCREUH1999KORBDCES2008USAASHRAE90.1-2007USAIECC 2006MaximumAnnual Heat<strong>in</strong>gand Cool<strong>in</strong>gLoads byClimate ZoneStandards forEquivalentClearance AreasCondensationControlConstructionDesign CriteriaEnvelopeBuild<strong>in</strong>gEnvelopeRequirementsThis section provides maximum allowable annual heat<strong>in</strong>g andcool<strong>in</strong>g loads and related parameters and calculationmethods.This section def<strong>in</strong>es equivalent clearance areas, which appearto relate to air exchange through <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g envelope.To prevent condensation that may reduce <strong>in</strong>sulationperformance and house durability, <strong>the</strong> property owner shouldprevent surface moisture condensation and moisturecondensation with<strong>in</strong> walls with proper measures.The Construction Design Criteria section <strong>in</strong>cludes bothmandatory items and recommended items. The mandatoryitems cover <strong>the</strong>rmal <strong>in</strong>sulation and heat resistancerequirements for <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g envelope such as regional U-factor values by build<strong>in</strong>g envelope component and regionspecificthicknesses of <strong>in</strong>sulat<strong>in</strong>g materials. Therecommended items provide suggestions on build<strong>in</strong>gorientation, seal<strong>in</strong>g, active use of natural light<strong>in</strong>g, shad<strong>in</strong>gand natural ventilation for energy conservation.The build<strong>in</strong>g envelope shall comply with <strong>the</strong> mandatoryprovisions and ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> prescriptive criteria or <strong>the</strong> trade-offoption. Alternatively, <strong>the</strong> whole build<strong>in</strong>g energy costapproach <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Cost Budget Method (ASHRAE 90.1-2007) or Total Build<strong>in</strong>g Performance Method (IECC 2006)may be used. The mandatory requirements coverrequirements for <strong>in</strong>sulation <strong>in</strong>stallation, w<strong>in</strong>dow and doorrat<strong>in</strong>g and build<strong>in</strong>g envelope seal<strong>in</strong>g to m<strong>in</strong>imize air leakage.This <strong>in</strong>cludes seal<strong>in</strong>g of build<strong>in</strong>g envelope penetrations,vestibules and load<strong>in</strong>g dock wea<strong>the</strong>r seals. In addition, <strong>the</strong>requirements cover how <strong>in</strong>sulation, w<strong>in</strong>dows and doorsshould be labeled. The prescriptive requirements (which areopen to trade-offs with alternate paths of compliance) coverrequirements for roofs, opaque walls, below-grade walls,foundations, vertical fenestration (or wall w<strong>in</strong>dow) andskylights.This section provides mandatory and prescriptive provisionson <strong>in</strong>sulation requirements, fenestration, air leakage, moisturecontrol, maximum fenestration U-factor and solar heat ga<strong>in</strong>coefficient (SHGC).Based on <strong>the</strong> data availability and geographic location of APP countries, this sectioncompares <strong>the</strong>rmal characteristics of roof, external wall, floor and w<strong>in</strong>dow for a generic10-floor office build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> hot, warm, cool and cold climate zones (Table 8). Thecomparison also <strong>in</strong>cludes Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s residential build<strong>in</strong>gs because <strong>the</strong>y are mostly multifamilyapartment build<strong>in</strong>gs, and Ch<strong>in</strong>a has a grow<strong>in</strong>g stock of high-rise residentialbuild<strong>in</strong>gs. In addition, Figures 1 and 2 compare <strong>the</strong> wall and roof requirements for<strong>in</strong>dividual homes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> APP countries with separate codes for such build<strong>in</strong>gs.36
The comparison study is focused on four climate zones: hot, warm, cool, and very cold.The <strong>the</strong>rmal criteria of <strong>the</strong>se four climate zones are based on International Climate ZoneDef<strong>in</strong>itions of IECC 2006. Each zone conta<strong>in</strong>s cities of different countries (Table 9).Table 10 Climate Zones and Cities Covered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Comparison of Maximum U-factor for Build<strong>in</strong>gEnvelope <strong>in</strong> APP CountriesClimate Zone Thermal Criteria Representative CitiesHot 5,000 < CDD10 o C Darw<strong>in</strong> (AUS), Ha<strong>in</strong>an (CHN), <strong>New</strong>Delhi (IND) and Miami (USA)Warm2,500 < CDD10 o C
- Page 1 and 2: PNNL-122267Shaping the Energy Effic
- Page 3: Shaping the Energy Efficiency in Ne
- Page 6 and 7: efficient air conditioning system,
- Page 8 and 9: ContentsForeword ..................
- Page 10 and 11: List of TablesTable 1 GDP, Primary
- Page 12 and 13: ForewordBuildings account for about
- Page 14 and 15: 1 Introduction and Background1.1 Im
- Page 16 and 17: esidential buildings in 2006, with
- Page 18 and 19: JAP 1. Criteria for Clients on the
- Page 20 and 21: can significantly increase energy d
- Page 22 and 23: f) South Korea’s building energy
- Page 24 and 25: 2.1 AustraliaIn the past, Australia
- Page 26 and 27: small cities will be pilot of such
- Page 28 and 29: (DCGREUH) issued by the Ministry of
- Page 30 and 31: according to the current codes. Thi
- Page 32 and 33: Table 7 Structural Comparison of Bu
- Page 34 and 35: 3.3 Building EnvelopeKey Findings A
- Page 38 and 39: This study selects the midpoint sco
- Page 40 and 41: MiamiUSA0.36(Insulationabove deck)t
- Page 42 and 43: Six countries have jurisdictions in
- Page 44 and 45: thermal requirements for roofs, flo
- Page 46 and 47: Figure 6 Maximum U-factors in Resid
- Page 48 and 49: Table 16 HVAC in Japan’s Building
- Page 50 and 51: ItemsService water heating refers t
- Page 52 and 53: Water conservation Canada has manda
- Page 54 and 55: practice (MNECB 1997). India sets m
- Page 56 and 57: Canada and India adopt compliance p
- Page 58 and 59: Japan only supervises the building
- Page 60 and 61: 4.2 Testing and RatingKey Findings
- Page 62 and 63: Other commonly used tools among APP
- Page 64 and 65: CAN 55MNECH1997CHNINDECBCJAPCanadia
- Page 66 and 67: and local jurisdiction contact info
- Page 68 and 69: certifying third-party verifiers or
- Page 70 and 71: Point of ControlIncentives for Comp
- Page 72 and 73: Point of ControlIncentives for Comp
- Page 74 and 75: AUS,continuedCANTesting Agencies an
- Page 76 and 77: CAN,continuedCHNTesting Agencies an
- Page 78 and 79: Testing Agencies and Certification
- Page 80 and 81: USA,continuedTesting Agencies and C
- Page 82 and 83: Appendix C - Compliance SoftwareAUS
- Page 84 and 85: CANMNECB1997,continuedSoftwareMetho
- Page 86 and 87:
USAIECC 2006,continuedSoftwareMetho
- Page 88 and 89:
AUSBCA 2007,continuedCANMNECB1997CA
- Page 90 and 91:
JAP,ContinuedKORUSAASHRAE90.1-2007T
- Page 92 and 93:
AcronymsAPPAS/NZSASHRAEAUSBATFBCABD
- Page 94 and 95:
ReferencesABCB (Australian Building
- Page 96 and 97:
IEA (International Energy Agency).
- Page 98:
OEE. 2008. Energy Use Data Handbook