10.07.2015 Views

Shaping the Energy Efficiency in New Buildings - Building Energy ...

Shaping the Energy Efficiency in New Buildings - Building Energy ...

Shaping the Energy Efficiency in New Buildings - Building Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

efficient air condition<strong>in</strong>g system, for example, if <strong>the</strong> total designed energy use fallswith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> required norms. There are several approaches to establish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> basel<strong>in</strong>e forcomparison under <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g energy performance method. The United States uses costas its reference metric, while some o<strong>the</strong>r countries base <strong>the</strong> reference metric on energyconsumption.South Korea and Japan take a different approach, establish<strong>in</strong>g both mandatoryrequirements and a po<strong>in</strong>t system for a whole range of energy issues related to build<strong>in</strong>gs.Each new build<strong>in</strong>g must have a m<strong>in</strong>imum number of po<strong>in</strong>ts ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> total or by category.Build<strong>in</strong>gs that exceed <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum po<strong>in</strong>t requirement may be eligible for certa<strong>in</strong> benefits,such as relaxation of some zon<strong>in</strong>g rules.Enforcement SystemsEnforcement is critical for <strong>the</strong> standard to have an effect. Not all countries havemandatory build<strong>in</strong>g energy standards. India, for example, has a voluntary code. Japan’sstandards are also technically voluntary, although Japan has recently adopted penaltiesfor non-compliance that blur this dist<strong>in</strong>ction. The United States, Canada and Australia alladopt build<strong>in</strong>g standards at <strong>the</strong> local level. Not all jurisdictions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States andCanada have adopted <strong>the</strong>ir nation’s model build<strong>in</strong>g energy codes. Ch<strong>in</strong>a has mandatorynational codes, but prov<strong>in</strong>ces have <strong>the</strong> option to adopt more str<strong>in</strong>gent local codes.Some important issues regard<strong>in</strong>g enforcement and <strong>the</strong> related impact of <strong>the</strong> code onenergy use <strong>in</strong>clude: <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t of compliance (design and/or construction stage), howbuild<strong>in</strong>gs are reviewed or <strong>in</strong>spected and by whom, penalties and o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>centives forcompliance, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> code, compliance tools such as codecompliance software and <strong>in</strong>spection checklists, and equipment and material test<strong>in</strong>g andrat<strong>in</strong>gs.In <strong>the</strong> United States, Canada, Australia and South Korea, for example, <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gdesign must be approved, and <strong>in</strong>spectors check <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g for compliance at least oncedur<strong>in</strong>g construction. In Japan, <strong>the</strong> reviews only occur at <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g design stage. Ch<strong>in</strong>auses a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of government employees and certified companies to check build<strong>in</strong>gdesigns and <strong>in</strong>spect <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs for compliance. There is no s<strong>in</strong>gle answer as to whichsystem produces <strong>the</strong> highest level of compliance. For example, Japanese officials believethat Japan atta<strong>in</strong>s a high level of compliance <strong>in</strong> actual construction because Japan has avery well developed system of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>formation dissem<strong>in</strong>ation on <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>genergy standards. Anecdotal evidence <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States and o<strong>the</strong>r countries <strong>in</strong>dicatesthat <strong>in</strong>spections do play an important role <strong>in</strong> atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g high levels of compliance. The U.S.Department of <strong>Energy</strong> is now develop<strong>in</strong>g methodologies to measure and trackcompliance.The str<strong>in</strong>gency of <strong>the</strong> national system for test<strong>in</strong>g materials and equipment for <strong>the</strong>ir energyefficiency properties can also have a marked impact on <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al energy consumption of abuild<strong>in</strong>g. Most countries have a system of certified laboratories that test materials andequipment (like w<strong>in</strong>dows and air conditioners) and rate <strong>the</strong>m for efficiency. These rat<strong>in</strong>gs6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!