HUMAN SKELETAL REMAINS OF THE ANCIENT MAYA IN THE ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

127Brady JE. 1995. A Reassessment of the Chronology and Function of Gordon’s Cave#3, Copan, Honduras. Ancient Mesoamerica 6:29-38.Brady JE. 1994. Introducción: Proyecto Arqueológico Regional de Petexbatun deReconocimiento de Cuevas. In: Demarest AA, Valdés JA, Escobedo H, editors.Proyecto Arqueológico Regional Petexbatun. Informe Preliminar # 6, SextaTemporada 1994, volúmen 2. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press. p523-536.Brady JE. 1990a. Investigaciones en la Cueva de El Duende. In: Demarest AA,Houston SD, editors. Proyecto Arqueológico Regional Petexbatun. InformePreliminar #2, Segunda Temporada 1990. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt UniversityPress. p 334-351.Brady JE. 1990b. Investigaciones en la Cueva de la Sangre y Otras Cuevas de laRegión de Petexbatun. In: Demarest AA, Houston SD, editors. ProyectoArqueológico Regional Petexbatun. Informe Preliminar #2, Segunda Temporada1990. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press. p 438-490.Brady JE, Prufer KM. 1999. Caves and Crystalmancy: Evidence for the Use ofCrystals in Ancient Maya Religion. Journal of Anthropological Research55(1):129-144.Brady JE, Scott A, Cobb A, Rodas I, Fogarty J, Urquizú Sánchez M. 1997. Glimpses ofthe Dark Side of the Petexbatun Project. Ancient Mesoamerica 8(2):353-364.Brady JE, Hasseman G, Fogarty JH. 1995. Harvest of Skulls and Bones. Archaeology48(3):36-40.
128Brady JE, Rodas I. 1995. Maya Ritual Cave Deposits: Recent Insights from the Cuevade Los Quetzales. Institute of Maya Studies Journal 1(1):17-25.Brady JE, Schwegman AS. 1993. Nuevos Métodos para la Investigación de CuevasMayas en Petexbatun. In: Valdés JA, Foias A, Inomata T, Escobedo H,Demarest AA, editors. Proyecto Arqueológico Regional Petexbatun. InformePreliminar # 5, Quinta Temporada 1993. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt UniversityPress.Brady JE, Rodas I, Wright L, Emery K, López NM, Stiver L, Chatham R. 1991.Proyecto Arqueológico Regional de Cuevas Petexbatun. In: Demarest AA,Inomata T, Escobedo H, Palka J, editors. Proyecto Arqueológico RegionalPetexbatun. Informe Preliminar #3, Tercera Temporada 1991. Nashville, TN:Vanderbilt University Press. p 652-748.Brady JE, Stone AJ. 1986. Naj Tunich: Entrance to the Maya Underworld.Archaeology 39(6):18-25.Carlson J. 1981. A Geomantic Model for the Interpretation of Mesoamerican Sites: AnEssay in Cross-Cultural Comparisons. In: Bensen E, editor. Mesoamerican Sitesand World-Views. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks. p 143-215.Casteel RW. 1977. Characterization of Faunal Assemblages and the Minimum Numberof Individuals Determined from Paired Elements: Continuing Problems inArchaeology. Journal of Archaeological Sciences 4:125-134.Coe MD. 1999. The Maya, 6 th edition. New York, NY: Thames and Hudson.
Page 1 and 2:
HUMAN SKELETAL REMAINS OF THE ANCIE
Page 3 and 4:
iiiABSTRACTHuman Skeletal Remains o
Page 5 and 6:
vACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis research was
Page 7 and 8:
viiCHAPTERPageIV SITE DESCRIPTIONS
Page 9 and 10:
ixLIST OF FIGURESFIGUREPage1 Map of
Page 11 and 12:
xiLIST OF TABLESTABLEPage1 Caves of
Page 13 and 14:
2Fig. 1. Map of the Petexbatun regi
Page 15 and 16:
4prove or disprove my hypothesis. T
Page 19 and 20:
8Caves are also known to share an o
Page 21 and 22:
10Artifactual materialThe artifacts
Page 23 and 24:
12activities, which included bloodl
Page 25 and 26:
14represented. A ceramic analysis r
Page 27 and 28:
16based on the identification of th
Page 29 and 30:
18when a structure is placed over o
Page 31 and 32:
20The Copan Ritual Caves Project la
Page 33 and 34:
22sacrificial victims. The identifi
Page 35 and 36:
24CHAPTER IIIMATERIALS AND METHODSS
Page 37 and 38:
26InventoryMy analysis began with a
Page 39 and 40:
28responsible. A precise methodolog
Page 41 and 42:
30After rounding up to the highest
Page 43 and 44:
32and subadults are differentiated
Page 45 and 46:
34demonstrate the practice of inter
Page 47 and 48:
36Implements such stone tools may h
Page 49 and 50:
38of the young woman involved the r
Page 51 and 52:
40Fig. 3. Caves of the Petexbatun.
Page 53 and 54:
42I) consisted of an excavation in
Page 55 and 56:
44Cueva de Río El DuendeCueva de R
Page 57 and 58:
46excavation uncovered evidence of
Page 59 and 60:
48Fig. 6. Complete map of Cueva de
Page 61 and 62:
50these remains were recovered by m
Page 63 and 64:
52Dos Pilas as a dominant polity in
Page 65 and 66:
54Fig. 7. Map of Cueva de Los Quetz
Page 67 and 68:
56CHAPTER VNISP AND MNI - AN ANALYS
Page 69 and 70:
58Cueva de El DuendeOne hundred for
Page 71 and 72:
60feet were the most common skeleta
Page 73 and 74:
62estimates indicate that Cueva de
Page 75 and 76:
64skeletal elementpedal phalangemet
Page 77 and 78:
66TABLE 4. MNI for Cueva de Río El
Page 79 and 80:
68five rooms in Operation CNP2. Roo
Page 81 and 82:
70CNP2-24-1CNP2-26-1CNP2-27-1CNP2-2
Page 83 and 84:
72modification was one of the more
Page 85 and 86:
74result from a small sample size,
Page 87 and 88: 76material examined in this study,
Page 89 and 90: 78TABLE 7. MNI for Cueva de Sangre.
Page 91 and 92: 80MNI considered material from 41 l
Page 93 and 94: 82CS9-06-1CS11-03-2CS11-03-3CS11-03
Page 95 and 96: 84Three hundred and fifty meters of
Page 97 and 98: 8626 individuals (Table 9). I ident
Page 99 and 100: 88calculated an MNI at the level of
Page 101 and 102: 90TABLE 11. MNI for Cueva de Los Qu
Page 103 and 104: 92the operation and the cave seem m
Page 105 and 106: 94between these two types of activi
Page 107 and 108: 96represent the sample with evidenc
Page 109 and 110: 98The second group consists of eigh
Page 111 and 112: 100One of the deeper cut marks was
Page 113 and 114: 102CNP2-07-1/18A complete left femo
Page 115 and 116: 104occur throughout the bone. The f
Page 117 and 118: 106The identification of human-made
Page 119 and 120: 108harsh effects of the active envi
Page 121 and 122: 110did not affect this particular b
Page 123 and 124: 112TABLE 12. NISPs, MNIs, and PNIs
Page 125 and 126: 114processed for secondary burial (
Page 127 and 128: 116in mind that this and the many o
Page 129 and 130: 118an adult male recovered from an
Page 131 and 132: 120Cueva de Los QuetzalesThe skelet
Page 133 and 134: 122some doubt. These assessments ba
Page 135 and 136: 124CHAPTER VIIICONCLUSIONSThe infor
Page 137: 126LITERATURE CITEDAnderson AH. 196
Page 141 and 142: 130Johnston FE. 1962. Growth of the
Page 143 and 144: 132Pohl M, Pohl J. 1983. Ancient Ma
Page 145 and 146: 134Pre-Columbian Archaeology. Oxfor
Page 147 and 148: APPENDIX IINVENTORY FOR CUEVA DE EL
Page 149 and 150: CD2-01-8B pelvis R complete ischium
Page 151 and 152: APPENDIX IIINVENTORY FOR CUEVA DE R
Page 153 and 154: CNP2-07-1/10 femur L prox.1/2 shaft
Page 155 and 156: CNP2-12-1/13 humerus R dist.1/2 sha
Page 157 and 158: CNP2-20-1/11 femur L nearly complet
Page 159 and 160: CNP2-26-1/1 long bone ? 4+ fragsCNP
Page 161 and 162: CNP2-28-1/35 mandible L no teeth &
Page 163 and 164: APPENDIX IIIINVENTORY FOR CUEVA DE
Page 165 and 166: CRM4-03-1/1 tibia R shaft frag, cor
Page 167 and 168: CS1-77-2/3 sacrum A anterior aspect
Page 169 and 170: CS2-11-1/2 radius R complete shaft,
Page 171 and 172: CS5-07-1/11 frags ? 7 fragsCS5-07-1
Page 173 and 174: CS9-02-1 B7 tibia L prox.2/3 shaft,
Page 175 and 176: CS9-04-1/3 tibia R prox.1/2 shaft,
Page 177 and 178: CS9-06-1/14 femur L complete shaft,
Page 179 and 180: CS11-05-1/3 long bone ? 15 fragsCS1
Page 181 and 182: CS11-05-1 grp.B/1 vertebra A centru
Page 183 and 184: CKP2-03-1/10 femur L complete shaft
Page 185 and 186: CKP2-04-1/3 femur L dist.1/2 shaft,
Page 187 and 188: CKP9-06-1 tibia R CKP 62-63; prox.1
Page 189 and 190:
CQ1-10-11 upper I2 R root is formin
show all

HUMAN SKELETAL REMAINS OF THE ANCIENT MAYA IN THE ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?