131Massey VK, DG Steele. 1997. A Maya Skull Pit From the Terminal Classic Period,Colha, Belize. In: Whittington SL, DM Reed, editors. Bones of the Maya.Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. p 62-77.Mercer HC. 1896. Hill-Caves of Yucatán. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott.Nelson BA, Darling JA, Kice DA. 1992. Mortuary Practices and the Social Order at LaQuemada, Zacatecas, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 3(4):298-315.O’Connor T. 2000. The Archaeology of Animal Bones. College Station, TX: TexasA&M University Press.Owen V. 2002. An Investigation of Classic Maya Cave Mortuary Practices at BartonCreek Cave, Belize. Master’s Thesis, Colorado State University.Pagden AR. 1975. The Maya: Diego de Landa’s Account of the Affairs of Yucatan.Chicago, IL: J.Philip O’Hara.Pendergast DM. 1974. Excavations at Actun Polbilche, Belize. Toronto, Canada: TheHunter Rose Company.Pendergast DM. 1971. Excavations at Eduardo Quiroz Cave, British Honduras (Belize).Toronto, Canada: McCorquodale & Blades Printers Ltd.Pendergast DM. 1970. A.H. Anderson’s Excavations at Rio Frio Cave E, BritishHonduras (Belize). Toronto, Canada: Cape & Company Ltd.Pendergast DM. 1969. The Prehistory of Actun Balam, British Honduras. Toronto,Canada: The University of Toronto Press.Plug C, Plug I. 1990. MNI counts as estimates of species abundance. South AfricanArchaeological Bulletin 45:53-57.
132Pohl M, Pohl J. 1983. Ancient Maya Cave Rituals. Archaeology 36(3):28-51.Raemsch CA. 1993. Mechanical Procedures Involved in Bone Dismemberment andDefleshing in Prehistoric Michigan. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology18:217-244.Rue DJ, Freter A, Ballinger DA. 1989. The Caverns of Copán Revisited: PreclassicSites in the Sesesmil River Valley, Copán, Honduras. Journal of FieldArchaeology 16:395-404.Scott A. 1994a. 1993 Investigations in the Cueva de Sangre. In: Demarest AA, ValdésJA, Escobedo H, editors. Proyecto Arqueológico Regional Petexbatun. InformePreliminar # 6, Sexta Temporada 1994, volúmen 2. Nashville, TN: VanderbiltUniversity Press. p 537-541.Scott A. 1994b. Investigations of Cueva de Kaxon Pec. In: Demarest AA, Valdés JA,Escobedo H, editors. Proyecto Arqueológico Regional Petexbatun. InformePreliminar # 6, Sexta Temporada 1994, volúmen 2. Nashville, TN: VanderbiltUniversity Press. p 542-553.Smith AL. 1972. Excavations at Altar de Sacrificios: Architecture, Settlement, Burials,and Caches. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology andEthnology, v. 62(2). Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum.Steele DG, Bramblett CA. 1988. The Anatomy and Biology of the Human Skeleton.College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.Stone AJ. 1995. Images from the Underworld: Naj Tunich and the Tradition of MayaCave Painting. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
- Page 1 and 2:
HUMAN SKELETAL REMAINS OF THE ANCIE
- Page 3 and 4:
iiiABSTRACTHuman Skeletal Remains o
- Page 5 and 6:
vACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis research was
- Page 7 and 8:
viiCHAPTERPageIV SITE DESCRIPTIONS
- Page 9 and 10:
ixLIST OF FIGURESFIGUREPage1 Map of
- Page 11 and 12:
xiLIST OF TABLESTABLEPage1 Caves of
- Page 13 and 14:
2Fig. 1. Map of the Petexbatun regi
- Page 15 and 16:
4prove or disprove my hypothesis. T
- Page 19 and 20:
8Caves are also known to share an o
- Page 21 and 22:
10Artifactual materialThe artifacts
- Page 23 and 24:
12activities, which included bloodl
- Page 25 and 26:
14represented. A ceramic analysis r
- Page 27 and 28:
16based on the identification of th
- Page 29 and 30:
18when a structure is placed over o
- Page 31 and 32:
20The Copan Ritual Caves Project la
- Page 33 and 34:
22sacrificial victims. The identifi
- Page 35 and 36:
24CHAPTER IIIMATERIALS AND METHODSS
- Page 37 and 38:
26InventoryMy analysis began with a
- Page 39 and 40:
28responsible. A precise methodolog
- Page 41 and 42:
30After rounding up to the highest
- Page 43 and 44:
32and subadults are differentiated
- Page 45 and 46:
34demonstrate the practice of inter
- Page 47 and 48:
36Implements such stone tools may h
- Page 49 and 50:
38of the young woman involved the r
- Page 51 and 52:
40Fig. 3. Caves of the Petexbatun.
- Page 53 and 54:
42I) consisted of an excavation in
- Page 55 and 56:
44Cueva de Río El DuendeCueva de R
- Page 57 and 58:
46excavation uncovered evidence of
- Page 59 and 60:
48Fig. 6. Complete map of Cueva de
- Page 61 and 62:
50these remains were recovered by m
- Page 63 and 64:
52Dos Pilas as a dominant polity in
- Page 65 and 66:
54Fig. 7. Map of Cueva de Los Quetz
- Page 67 and 68:
56CHAPTER VNISP AND MNI - AN ANALYS
- Page 69 and 70:
58Cueva de El DuendeOne hundred for
- Page 71 and 72:
60feet were the most common skeleta
- Page 73 and 74:
62estimates indicate that Cueva de
- Page 75 and 76:
64skeletal elementpedal phalangemet
- Page 77 and 78:
66TABLE 4. MNI for Cueva de Río El
- Page 79 and 80:
68five rooms in Operation CNP2. Roo
- Page 81 and 82:
70CNP2-24-1CNP2-26-1CNP2-27-1CNP2-2
- Page 83 and 84:
72modification was one of the more
- Page 85 and 86:
74result from a small sample size,
- Page 87 and 88:
76material examined in this study,
- Page 89 and 90:
78TABLE 7. MNI for Cueva de Sangre.
- Page 91 and 92: 80MNI considered material from 41 l
- Page 93 and 94: 82CS9-06-1CS11-03-2CS11-03-3CS11-03
- Page 95 and 96: 84Three hundred and fifty meters of
- Page 97 and 98: 8626 individuals (Table 9). I ident
- Page 99 and 100: 88calculated an MNI at the level of
- Page 101 and 102: 90TABLE 11. MNI for Cueva de Los Qu
- Page 103 and 104: 92the operation and the cave seem m
- Page 105 and 106: 94between these two types of activi
- Page 107 and 108: 96represent the sample with evidenc
- Page 109 and 110: 98The second group consists of eigh
- Page 111 and 112: 100One of the deeper cut marks was
- Page 113 and 114: 102CNP2-07-1/18A complete left femo
- Page 115 and 116: 104occur throughout the bone. The f
- Page 117 and 118: 106The identification of human-made
- Page 119 and 120: 108harsh effects of the active envi
- Page 121 and 122: 110did not affect this particular b
- Page 123 and 124: 112TABLE 12. NISPs, MNIs, and PNIs
- Page 125 and 126: 114processed for secondary burial (
- Page 127 and 128: 116in mind that this and the many o
- Page 129 and 130: 118an adult male recovered from an
- Page 131 and 132: 120Cueva de Los QuetzalesThe skelet
- Page 133 and 134: 122some doubt. These assessments ba
- Page 135 and 136: 124CHAPTER VIIICONCLUSIONSThe infor
- Page 137 and 138: 126LITERATURE CITEDAnderson AH. 196
- Page 139 and 140: 128Brady JE, Rodas I. 1995. Maya Ri
- Page 141: 130Johnston FE. 1962. Growth of the
- Page 145 and 146: 134Pre-Columbian Archaeology. Oxfor
- Page 147 and 148: APPENDIX IINVENTORY FOR CUEVA DE EL
- Page 149 and 150: CD2-01-8B pelvis R complete ischium
- Page 151 and 152: APPENDIX IIINVENTORY FOR CUEVA DE R
- Page 153 and 154: CNP2-07-1/10 femur L prox.1/2 shaft
- Page 155 and 156: CNP2-12-1/13 humerus R dist.1/2 sha
- Page 157 and 158: CNP2-20-1/11 femur L nearly complet
- Page 159 and 160: CNP2-26-1/1 long bone ? 4+ fragsCNP
- Page 161 and 162: CNP2-28-1/35 mandible L no teeth &
- Page 163 and 164: APPENDIX IIIINVENTORY FOR CUEVA DE
- Page 165 and 166: CRM4-03-1/1 tibia R shaft frag, cor
- Page 167 and 168: CS1-77-2/3 sacrum A anterior aspect
- Page 169 and 170: CS2-11-1/2 radius R complete shaft,
- Page 171 and 172: CS5-07-1/11 frags ? 7 fragsCS5-07-1
- Page 173 and 174: CS9-02-1 B7 tibia L prox.2/3 shaft,
- Page 175 and 176: CS9-04-1/3 tibia R prox.1/2 shaft,
- Page 177 and 178: CS9-06-1/14 femur L complete shaft,
- Page 179 and 180: CS11-05-1/3 long bone ? 15 fragsCS1
- Page 181 and 182: CS11-05-1 grp.B/1 vertebra A centru
- Page 183 and 184: CKP2-03-1/10 femur L complete shaft
- Page 185 and 186: CKP2-04-1/3 femur L dist.1/2 shaft,
- Page 187 and 188: CKP9-06-1 tibia R CKP 62-63; prox.1
- Page 189 and 190: CQ1-10-11 upper I2 R root is formin