CNP2-30-1/5 parietal L-R large frag.w/ sagittal suture, larger portion (L), fused sutures, poss.adultCNP2-30-1/6 long bone ? 3 shaft frags, poss.humerus fragsCNP2-30-1/9 long bone ? portion of long bone w/ concretionsCNP2-30-1/11 long bone ? miscellaneous fragsCNP2-30-1/12 cranial ? 5 frags, parietal & frontal frag, stained & polished, worn edgesCNP2-31-1 M1/2 L fossilizedCNP2-31-1 P4 L fossilizedCNP2-31-1 ulna R midshaft fragCNP2-31-1 ulna R dist.shaft, patch of sclerotic bone on anterior surfaceCNP2-32-1 femur L shaft, surface covered w/ stalagtiteCNP2-32-1 femur ? shaft w/ irregular sclerotic periostitisCNP2-32-1 humerus ? shaftCNP2-32-1 I2 L complete, shoveled, filed (A4)CNP2-32-1 tibia L shaft, surface erosionCNP2-33-1/1 femur R complete shaft, no ends, worn, stained & polished, poss.young adultCNP2-33-1/2 cranial ? 4 frags, stained & polishedCNP2-33-1/3 humerus L dist.1/3 shaft, no end, small size, stained & polishedCNP2-33-1/4 long bone ? 20+ frags, stainedCNP2-36-1 M1 L complete, roots eroded, fossilizedCNP2-36-1 M1 R complete, roots eroded, fossilizedCNP2-36-1 M1/2 L nearly complete, root broken, very little wearCNP2-41-1 tibia L shaftNOTE: Skeletal elements in bold type were inventoried by Wright (unpublished notes 1994) and are not included in the sampleanalyzed in this study.151
APPENDIX III<strong>IN</strong>VENTORY FOR CUEVA DE RIO MURCIELAGOSLot Bone Side DescriptionCRM-05-1 femur L prox.1/2 midshaft, no end, linea aspera worn, post.aspect stained, concretionsCRM-05-1 humerus L dist.1/2 shaft minus articular end, polished & wornCRM-05-1 radius R prox.1/3 shaft, no end, pronounced interosseous margin, stained & polishedCRM-06-1 femur L nearly complete shaft, no ends, ptn of less trochanter, poss.gnaw marks on anterior face, S&PCRM1-04-5 phalange ? manual, complete shaft, unfused epiphyses, poss.subadultCRM1-06-3 D27 mandible R alveolus frag w/ Li2 to Rp3, teeth show little wear, highly friable, stained, poss.child (3-5 yrs)CRM1-06-4 D27 i2 L crown complete, root broken, alveolus frag.attached, caries on mesial surfaceCRM3-01-1/1 temp-occip R occipital portion w/ nuchal crest; temporal portion w/ mastoid proc., ext.aud.meatus, petrosal ptnCRM3-01-1/2 occipital nearly complete, pronounced nuchal area, good condition, both tables stainedCRM3-01-1/3 cranial 4 cranial vault frags, possible parietalCRM3-01-1/3 cranial 17 fragile cranial fragsCRM3-01-1/3 long bone 4 fragsCRM3-01-1/4 long bone femur or tibia shaft frag, polishedCRM3-01-1/4 cranial 6 fragile cranial frags, embedded in cave concretionsCRM3-01-1/5 zygomatic L complete process w/ portion of inferior orbitCRM3-01-1/5 nasal complete w/ heavy concretions, portion of nasal apertureCRM3-01-1/5 maxilla portion w/ left P4 & M1 intact, sockets for C, P3, P4, M1, heavy concretions, maxillary molarCRM3-01-1/6 ulna R complete midshaft, no ends, cortex flaking off, stainedCRM3-01-1 cranium complete, tabular oblique deformation, all sutures open, poss.young adult femaleCRM3-01-1 cranium nearly complete, no facial bones, no deformation, poss.adult male152
- Page 1 and 2:
HUMAN SKELETAL REMAINS OF THE ANCIE
- Page 3 and 4:
iiiABSTRACTHuman Skeletal Remains o
- Page 5 and 6:
vACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis research was
- Page 7 and 8:
viiCHAPTERPageIV SITE DESCRIPTIONS
- Page 9 and 10:
ixLIST OF FIGURESFIGUREPage1 Map of
- Page 11 and 12:
xiLIST OF TABLESTABLEPage1 Caves of
- Page 13 and 14:
2Fig. 1. Map of the Petexbatun regi
- Page 15 and 16:
4prove or disprove my hypothesis. T
- Page 19 and 20:
8Caves are also known to share an o
- Page 21 and 22:
10Artifactual materialThe artifacts
- Page 23 and 24:
12activities, which included bloodl
- Page 25 and 26:
14represented. A ceramic analysis r
- Page 27 and 28:
16based on the identification of th
- Page 29 and 30:
18when a structure is placed over o
- Page 31 and 32:
20The Copan Ritual Caves Project la
- Page 33 and 34:
22sacrificial victims. The identifi
- Page 35 and 36:
24CHAPTER IIIMATERIALS AND METHODSS
- Page 37 and 38:
26InventoryMy analysis began with a
- Page 39 and 40:
28responsible. A precise methodolog
- Page 41 and 42:
30After rounding up to the highest
- Page 43 and 44:
32and subadults are differentiated
- Page 45 and 46:
34demonstrate the practice of inter
- Page 47 and 48:
36Implements such stone tools may h
- Page 49 and 50:
38of the young woman involved the r
- Page 51 and 52:
40Fig. 3. Caves of the Petexbatun.
- Page 53 and 54:
42I) consisted of an excavation in
- Page 55 and 56:
44Cueva de Río El DuendeCueva de R
- Page 57 and 58:
46excavation uncovered evidence of
- Page 59 and 60:
48Fig. 6. Complete map of Cueva de
- Page 61 and 62:
50these remains were recovered by m
- Page 63 and 64:
52Dos Pilas as a dominant polity in
- Page 65 and 66:
54Fig. 7. Map of Cueva de Los Quetz
- Page 67 and 68:
56CHAPTER VNISP AND MNI - AN ANALYS
- Page 69 and 70:
58Cueva de El DuendeOne hundred for
- Page 71 and 72:
60feet were the most common skeleta
- Page 73 and 74:
62estimates indicate that Cueva de
- Page 75 and 76:
64skeletal elementpedal phalangemet
- Page 77 and 78:
66TABLE 4. MNI for Cueva de Río El
- Page 79 and 80:
68five rooms in Operation CNP2. Roo
- Page 81 and 82:
70CNP2-24-1CNP2-26-1CNP2-27-1CNP2-2
- Page 83 and 84:
72modification was one of the more
- Page 85 and 86:
74result from a small sample size,
- Page 87 and 88:
76material examined in this study,
- Page 89 and 90:
78TABLE 7. MNI for Cueva de Sangre.
- Page 91 and 92:
80MNI considered material from 41 l
- Page 93 and 94:
82CS9-06-1CS11-03-2CS11-03-3CS11-03
- Page 95 and 96:
84Three hundred and fifty meters of
- Page 97 and 98:
8626 individuals (Table 9). I ident
- Page 99 and 100:
88calculated an MNI at the level of
- Page 101 and 102:
90TABLE 11. MNI for Cueva de Los Qu
- Page 103 and 104:
92the operation and the cave seem m
- Page 105 and 106:
94between these two types of activi
- Page 107 and 108:
96represent the sample with evidenc
- Page 109 and 110:
98The second group consists of eigh
- Page 111 and 112: 100One of the deeper cut marks was
- Page 113 and 114: 102CNP2-07-1/18A complete left femo
- Page 115 and 116: 104occur throughout the bone. The f
- Page 117 and 118: 106The identification of human-made
- Page 119 and 120: 108harsh effects of the active envi
- Page 121 and 122: 110did not affect this particular b
- Page 123 and 124: 112TABLE 12. NISPs, MNIs, and PNIs
- Page 125 and 126: 114processed for secondary burial (
- Page 127 and 128: 116in mind that this and the many o
- Page 129 and 130: 118an adult male recovered from an
- Page 131 and 132: 120Cueva de Los QuetzalesThe skelet
- Page 133 and 134: 122some doubt. These assessments ba
- Page 135 and 136: 124CHAPTER VIIICONCLUSIONSThe infor
- Page 137 and 138: 126LITERATURE CITEDAnderson AH. 196
- Page 139 and 140: 128Brady JE, Rodas I. 1995. Maya Ri
- Page 141 and 142: 130Johnston FE. 1962. Growth of the
- Page 143 and 144: 132Pohl M, Pohl J. 1983. Ancient Ma
- Page 145 and 146: 134Pre-Columbian Archaeology. Oxfor
- Page 147 and 148: APPENDIX IINVENTORY FOR CUEVA DE EL
- Page 149 and 150: CD2-01-8B pelvis R complete ischium
- Page 151 and 152: APPENDIX IIINVENTORY FOR CUEVA DE R
- Page 153 and 154: CNP2-07-1/10 femur L prox.1/2 shaft
- Page 155 and 156: CNP2-12-1/13 humerus R dist.1/2 sha
- Page 157 and 158: CNP2-20-1/11 femur L nearly complet
- Page 159 and 160: CNP2-26-1/1 long bone ? 4+ fragsCNP
- Page 161: CNP2-28-1/35 mandible L no teeth &
- Page 165 and 166: CRM4-03-1/1 tibia R shaft frag, cor
- Page 167 and 168: CS1-77-2/3 sacrum A anterior aspect
- Page 169 and 170: CS2-11-1/2 radius R complete shaft,
- Page 171 and 172: CS5-07-1/11 frags ? 7 fragsCS5-07-1
- Page 173 and 174: CS9-02-1 B7 tibia L prox.2/3 shaft,
- Page 175 and 176: CS9-04-1/3 tibia R prox.1/2 shaft,
- Page 177 and 178: CS9-06-1/14 femur L complete shaft,
- Page 179 and 180: CS11-05-1/3 long bone ? 15 fragsCS1
- Page 181 and 182: CS11-05-1 grp.B/1 vertebra A centru
- Page 183 and 184: CKP2-03-1/10 femur L complete shaft
- Page 185 and 186: CKP2-04-1/3 femur L dist.1/2 shaft,
- Page 187 and 188: CKP9-06-1 tibia R CKP 62-63; prox.1
- Page 189 and 190: CQ1-10-11 upper I2 R root is formin