23.11.2012 Views

JOURNAL OF ARABIC AND ISLAMIC STUDIES

JOURNAL OF ARABIC AND ISLAMIC STUDIES

JOURNAL OF ARABIC AND ISLAMIC STUDIES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JAIS<br />

ONLINE<br />

Andrew Marsham<br />

relevant in Iraq as in Syria or Egypt). First, it is notable that burning had<br />

a good Judaeo-Christian heritage: it was used against the worst offenders<br />

in Judaic law and maintained a similar position in the Christian Roman<br />

Empire. 81 Given the importance of the corpse of the deceased to the<br />

Judaeo-Christians in the late antique Mediterranean, 82 the near-complete<br />

destruction of the body by fire was a terrible penalty, with possible<br />

implications at the Resurrection. As the ḥadīth reserving the punishment<br />

for God indicates, it also recalled the image of Hell itself as a place of<br />

fiery torment. 83<br />

The other late antique context is the veneration of martyrs’ relics. 84<br />

Fire destroys the corpse of the executed person and so makes veneration<br />

123<br />

of their corpse as a relic difficult or even impossible. In this connection,<br />

it is very notable that many of the better-attested instances of immolation<br />

and the burning of corpses were carried out by Umayyads against Alid<br />

and Hashimite rebels in the late 730s and early 740s (39, 41, 44). In two<br />

cases, the ashes were said to have been scattered in the Euphrates (41,<br />

44), leaving no tomb. Here the context appears to be growing Alid and<br />

Hashimite feeling in Iraq, perhaps including veneration for ‘proto-<br />

Shiʿite’ martyrs. The connection between burning and ideas about the<br />

bodily resurrection in late antiquity and early Islam deserves further<br />

investigation.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Examination of the Umayyads’ own claims about capital punishment<br />

allows us to move beyond the contrasting interpretations of the anecdotal<br />

evidence presented by Abou El Fadl and Hawting. The choice is not<br />

between, on the one hand, a somewhat teleological interpretation of the<br />

Umayyads as co-opting early ‘classical’ ideas about the ḥirāba verse<br />

and, on the other, a view of the Umayyads as acting in an ‘arbitrary’<br />

fashion, unfettered by ‘Quranic’ or ‘Islamic’ prescriptions. Rather, we<br />

should consider the Umayyads as part of what has recently been<br />

described as ‘Islamic late antiquity’. 85 Read with accounts of Roman<br />

81 See above, 117–8.<br />

82 On burial practices in the Middle East in late antiquity, see L. Halevi,<br />

Muhammad’s Grave: Death Rites and the Making of Islamic Society (New York,<br />

2007), 76–7, 80–1.<br />

83 See Appendix, no. 4, and note.<br />

84 Halevi, Muhammad’s Tomb, 81.<br />

85 T. Sizgorich, ‘Narrative and Community in Islamic Late Antiquity’, Past and<br />

Present 185 (2004), 9–42.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!