Chapter V4.Bilateral Donors and Livelihood ProjectsDFID hasemerged inrecent years asthe predominantbilateraldonor operatingin India.4.1 Department for International <strong>Development</strong> (DFID) 15DFID has emerged in recent years as the predominant bilateral donor operating in India. DFID’s rurallivelihoods programmes in the country work with the governments of Andhra Pradesh, Orissa, MadhyaPradesh (MP) and West Bengal. These programmes have the primary objective of increasing the sustainabilityof poor people’s livelihoods by promoting (and enabling promotion of):• improved access to high-quality education, information, technologies and training and better nutritionand health;• a more supportive and cohesive social environment;• more secure access to, and better management of, natural resources;• better access to basic and facilitating infrastructure;• more secure access to financial resources; and• a policy and institutional environment that supports multiple livelihood strategies and promotesequitable access to competitive markets for all 16DFID’s current rural livelihoods portfolio comprises rainfed farming projects, watershed-based developmentprogrammes and rural livelihoods programmes based on Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) oradministrative units.`Peoplecenteredness’rather thanfocus onresources reflectsthe thinkingof developmentpractitionersworldwide overthe past twodecadesDuring the period 1998-2002 DFID placed considerable emphasis on the development and rolling outof sustainable livelihoods (SL) approaches. The process of giving meaning and substance to SL wasboth challenging and inclusive. It reinvigorated the rural development cadre within DFID and broughtsignificant influence throughout the wider development community. During the late 1990s, DFID’s mainfocus was on the rainfed farming projects in eastern and western India, the next generation focusedon the watershed based development programmes of the government of India. Adopting a ‘watershedplus’ approach, DFID has helped transform the watershed based development programs of the Governmentof India from natural resource programs, focusing on physical conservation works and primarilybenefiting larger, mostly male, landowners, to people centred programs. The latter are, inclusive of allthe residents of the watersheds and pay particular attention to landless, women and other vulnerablegroups. The ‘plus’ includes components for productivity enhancement and micro-enterprise promotionwithin the overall approach of enhanced participation, capacity building and innovation. Emphasis ondecentralization of government through elected PRIs prompted different variants of the rural livelihoodsmodel in MP and West Bengal.There are several such projects in India but the major ones are:1. Andhra Pradesh Rural Livelihoods Programme (APRLP) (Completed)2. Madhya Pradesh Rural Livelihoods Project (MPRLP)3. Western Orissa Rural Livelihoods Project (WORLP)4. West Bengal Strengthening Rural Decentralisation Program (SRD)5. Orissa Tribal Empowerment and Livelihoods Programme (OTELP)6. Eastern India and Western India Rainfed Farming Projects (EIRFP) - (completed)While APRLP and WORLP are watershed-based development projects, MPRLP, West Bengal SRD andOTELP are rural livelihoods programmes based on PRIs and administrative units.12415Cases developed by Ramesh S Arunachalam16Source: Quoted with adaptation from DFID Official Website and related resources
Public Systems: Major central government anddonor-supported programmes for Livelihood Promotion(i) Andhra Pradesh Rural Livelihoods Programme (APRLP)The primary aim of the Andhra Pradesh Rural Livelihoods Programme (APRLP) had been povertyelimination and reduction in five semi-arid and drought prone districts in rural Andhra Pradesh, namelyAnanthapur, Kurnool, Mahaboobnagar, Nalgonda and Prakasam districts. The project aimed to achievethis goal through building effective and sustainable rural livelihoods in these districts, taking watershedsas an initial entry point. The larger aim was the development of effective and sustainable approachesto be adopted by government agencies and other stakeholders involved in poverty alleviation efforts.The partners to the state government’s rural development department in the project were DFID, theprincipal funding agency, other government departments and agencies, other national and regionalNGOs and research organisations. While the project was originally implemented in 1999 in the fiveproject areas, it has subsequently been extended to watershed projects in other parts of the state as well.DFID had committed financial support to the tune of Rs 364.34 crore for the purpose of this project.`People-centeredness’ rather than focus on resources reflects the thinking of development practitionersworldwide over the past two decades and this shift has changed the way in which watershed developmentis perceived and implemented under this project.The four main focal components of APRLP are watershed and watershed-plus initiatives, capacity buildingof primary and secondary stakeholders, innovation to enhance the impact of watershed work andlearning lessons that will help in the context of policy influence.The DFID-funded APRLP makes an innovative departure from the conventional watershed approach,applying the ‘Watershed Plus’ agenda. This, while remaining committed to the basic principles of watersheddevelopment, it attempts to achieve a more equitable local distribution of the benefits, throughsocial mobilisation, institution-building and improved livelihood opportunities, with the focus on naturalresource based livelihoods. This programme accords high importance to community participation anddecision-making to ensure demand-driven planning and implementation in order to achieve sustaineddevelopment of physical and social structures. It does not confine itself to land-based development issues,positively builds upon, and strengthens existing self-help initiatives such as the women’s self-helpmovement.Perhaps themost seriouschallenge forAPRLP isto keep itselffocused on poorpeople and theirlivelihoods,given thescale of thebudget andits potentialfor ‘stealingcentrestage’.Under APRLP, 500 new watersheds at the rate of 100 per district in the original five districts were takenup. All these new watersheds were implemented through the VOs of women SHGs. Each watershed wasprovided with a budget of Rs 30 lakh to be spent over a period of five years. The action plans are revisedadopting Participatory Net Planning (PNP) methods and implementation is going on briskly in all thefive districts. The project is supporting the enhancement of livelihoods in 2,500 ongoing and completedwatersheds. Under this component, each watershed is provided with additional funds to the tune of Rs4.00 lakh for taking up livelihoods enhancement activities, to be utilised over a four-year period.Perhaps the most serious challenge for APRLP is to keep itself focused on poor people and their livelihoods,given the scale of the budget and its potential for ‘stealing centrestage’. Land-development projectscan often spend large amounts of money quickly on infrastructure (bunds, water tanks, irrigation, andso on). They are attractive to politicians seeking to demonstrate the good they have brought to theirconstituencies, because the constructions are literally something to show for the money spent. In contrast,participatory development projects take longer to get off the ground, spend more slowly and theirimpact is often less visible. So the pressure to focus on the ‘land development’ aspects at the cost of theparticipatory process is great. This distracts from the need for careful people-centred planning.(ii) Madhya Pradesh Rural Livelihoods Project (MPRLP)Poor access to resources, markets, information and services, are constraints to realising the potential ofavailable opportunities and hinder diversification of livelihood strategies in the tribal areas of MadhyaPradesh. MPRLP seeks to enhance poor people’s livelihoods in tribal dominated districts of the state and125
- Page 3 and 4:
State of India’s Livelihoods :The
- Page 5 and 6:
ChapterPage NoForeword 6Preface 8Ab
- Page 8:
ForewordAs a part of its microfinan
- Page 11 and 12:
employment growth, these sectors we
- Page 14:
RIAARMKRRBRSVYSCSC/STsSCPSCSPSERPSE
- Page 20 and 21:
Chapter Iresponse, risks and shocks
- Page 23 and 24:
OverviewTable 1.2 Employment and Un
- Page 25 and 26:
OverviewA recent paper by Arjun Sen
- Page 27:
Overview4. How is the livelihood st
- Page 31 and 32:
Overview5.2 Manmade constraints - i
- Page 33 and 34:
Overviewthe late 1980s, these two m
- Page 35 and 36:
OverviewIn the 1970s, the Chipko mo
- Page 37 and 38:
Overviewsocial responsibility (CSR)
- Page 39 and 40:
OverviewBox 1.3 Bihar - Underdevelo
- Page 42 and 43:
4040
- Page 44 and 45:
Chapter IIAn enumeration of the dep
- Page 46 and 47:
Chapter IIBox 2.1 Macro Level Livel
- Page 48 and 49:
Chapter IIIn addition to the above,
- Page 50 and 51:
Chapter IIFig 2.1: Poverty Ratio am
- Page 52 and 53:
Chapter IIPoormigrantlabouroften su
- Page 54 and 55:
Chapter IIInterestingly, the Govern
- Page 56 and 57:
Chapter IIThe effective cost of nat
- Page 58 and 59:
Chapter IIsector and thereby casual
- Page 60 and 61:
Chapter IIReferences1. Aiyar , Swam
- Page 62 and 63:
Chapter IIIto, the vulnerability co
- Page 64 and 65:
Chapter IIIIt would be useful here
- Page 66 and 67:
Chapter IIIof new employment opport
- Page 68 and 69:
Chapter IIIinterest subvention - wo
- Page 70 and 71:
Chapter III6. The 11th Plan propose
- Page 72 and 73:
Chapter IIIBox 3.5: Rural Business
- Page 74 and 75:
Chapter III9. The achievement of ge
- Page 76 and 77: Chapter IIIaid. The Plan also seeks
- Page 78 and 79: Chapter IIIand health. They point o
- Page 80 and 81: Chapter IIIReferences1. Ambasta, Pr
- Page 82 and 83: 8080
- Page 84 and 85: Chapter IVtransport, storage, commu
- Page 86 and 87: Chapter IVing of ‘English Speakin
- Page 88 and 89: Chapter IVWhile these livelihoods h
- Page 90 and 91: Chapter IVTable 4.6 Employment with
- Page 92 and 93: Chapter IVConstruction requires no
- Page 94 and 95: Chapter IVgains in manufacturing ha
- Page 96 and 97: Chapter IV10. A Spatial Perspective
- Page 98 and 99: Chapter IVA quick glance at some of
- Page 100 and 101: Chapter IV12. Once a watershed is d
- Page 102: Chapter IVThrougha range ofschemes
- Page 105 and 106: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 107 and 108: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 109 and 110: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 111 and 112: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 113 and 114: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 115 and 116: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 117 and 118: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 119 and 120: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 121 and 122: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 123 and 124: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 125: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 129 and 130: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 131 and 132: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 133 and 134: Civil Society InitiativesChapter VI
- Page 135 and 136: Civil Society InitiativesThe human
- Page 137 and 138: Civil Society Initiativesso far has
- Page 139 and 140: Civil Society Initiativesan 8 per c
- Page 141 and 142: Civil Society InitiativesThe cooper
- Page 143 and 144: Civil Society Initiativeslimited ir
- Page 145 and 146: Civil Society Initiativesintelligen
- Page 147 and 148: Civil Society InitiativesOutboard M
- Page 149 and 150: Civil Society InitiativesCase Study
- Page 151 and 152: Civil Society InitiativesReferences
- Page 153 and 154: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 155 and 156: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 157 and 158: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 159 and 160: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 161 and 162: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 163 and 164: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 165 and 166: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 167 and 168: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 169 and 170: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 172 and 173: Chapter VIII170
- Page 174 and 175: Chapter VIIIcountry that make the e
- Page 176 and 177:
Chapter VIIIFig 8.4: All-India area
- Page 178 and 179:
Chapter VIIIWhen commercial crops l
- Page 180 and 181:
Chapter VIIIunit of risk settlement
- Page 182 and 183:
Chapter VIIIPublic capitalformation
- Page 184 and 185:
Chapter VIII8. Integrated Rural Dev
- Page 186 and 187:
Chapter VIIIAn expertpanel ‘sreco
- Page 188 and 189:
Chapter VIIIHowever as final wage s
- Page 190:
188
- Page 193 and 194:
appENDIX TableTable A.1.3: Distribu
- Page 195 and 196:
appENDIX TableEmploymentEmploymentG
- Page 197 and 198:
appENDIX TableTable 2: Employment S
- Page 199 and 200:
appENDIX TableTable 4: State Wise G
- Page 201 and 202:
appENDIX TableTable-7: Distribution
- Page 203 and 204:
appENDIX TableDams and Displacement
- Page 205 and 206:
appENDIX TableFig. A.3.2: High Pote
- Page 207 and 208:
appENDIX TableTable A.3.2Table 2: S
- Page 209 and 210:
appENDIX TableChapter IV - ANNEX TA
- Page 211 and 212:
appENDIX TableAnnex A.5.1Backward R
- Page 213 and 214:
appENDIX TableAnnex A.5.3Some UNDP
- Page 215 and 216:
appENDIX TableGross Value of Output
- Page 217 and 218:
Mona DikshitMona Dikshit has been a