Chapter I34MFIs andNGOs havehelped animpressivenumber ofover 10 millionhouseholds withcumulativeloans of overRs 10,000crore. Some,like BASIX,recognise thelimitation ofminimalistmicrocreditand have builta significantmulti-facetedlivelihoodpromotionprogramme.6.4 Livelihood efforts by NGOsNon-governmental organisations (NGOs) have played a large role in livelihood promotion. The time rightbefore and well after India’s Independence saw several Gandhian organisations promoting livelihoodsin agriculture, khadi and village industries. One example of this was the Association for Sarva SevaFarms (ASSEFA), promoted by S. Loganathan in Tamil Nadu in 1969. ASSEFA originally meant to helpformerly landless families who had received land through the Bhoodan movement, make their land morecultivable. Today, it works with marginal farmers and the landless, in about 8,000 villages in eight statesthrough promoting land-based economic development – dairying, agriculture and micro-enterprises.It also works in education, community health and housing. With the help of BASIX, ASSEFA also setup Sarvodaya Nano Finance Ltd, a non-bank finance company (NBFC) which is owned by over 25,000women’s self-help groups (SHGs), and has provided micro-credit worth over Rs 400 crore since 2001.MYRADA, whose original name was Mysore Resettlement and <strong>Development</strong> Agency, was established in1968, by Capt Bill Davinson. It initially worked in resettling Tibetan refugees in Karnataka. A decadelater it shifted focus to promoting livelihoods of the rural poor through microcredit, building appropriatepeoples’ institutions, and training in relevant activities. It works in partnership with other NGOs in sixother states with about 75,000 families. Through a separate affiliate, Sanghamitra Rural Financial <strong>Services</strong>,it works with 6 lakh poor women, offering bulk loans to their SHGsStarting with a nature cure centre on the outskirts of Pune, Maharashtra, the Bhartiya Agro IndustriesFoundation (BAIF) later renamed BAIF <strong>Development</strong> Research Foundation was promoted by Gandhiansocial worker Manibhai Desai. Using local affiliates, BAIF works on a variety of rural developmentinitiatives, particularly livestock development and watershed and land resource development, agriculture,agro-forestry, Wadi (homestead orchard), renewable energy, and empowerment though SHGs. BAIFworks in 45,000 villages in 12 states across the country.Professional Assistance for <strong>Development</strong> Action (PRADAN), began in Bihar in the early 1980s inorder to help NGOs and government agencies make their development efforts more effective. It alsobegan to assist corporate rural development efforts (ITC Ltd) and the largest government livelihoodpromotion programme, IRDP. In the mid 1980s it also began working directly with poor communitiesin livelihood promotion. Today PRADAN works in 30 projects in seven states, with over 120,000 ruralpoor households, supporting agriculture, livestock, and non-farm rural enterprises, providing access tocredit by linking SHGs with banks, which PRADAN pioneered like MYRADA.After liberalisation, since 1991, banks became more averse to lending to the poor. As a result, manylivelihood promotion NGOs began to focus on microcredit, some forming SHGs and linking themwith banks and others started lending directly to the poor. In 1996, BASIX was promoted as India’s firstcommercial microfinance institution (MFI), as the founder believed that NGOs could not have significantaccess to capital markets. Yet, over 1000 NGOs got into microcredit with funds from FWWB, RMKand SIDBI. High unmet demand and supportive donors/lenders enabled rapid growth of these MFIs,and many of them including SHARE, Spandana and SKS, transformed from NGOs to NBFCs. Manyothers chose the intermediate form – a Section 25 company – like Sanghamitra of MYRADA, IASC ofPWDS+HDFC, and CMC of Cashpor. Still others, like PRADAN decided to stay as SHG promotionagencies and link their SHGs with banks. Through these diverse forms, MFIs and NGOs have helpedan impressive number of over 10 million households with cumulative loans of over Rs 10,000 crore.Some, like BASIX, however, recognise the limitation of minimalist microcredit and have over the yearsbuilt a significant multi-faceted livelihood promotion programme.6.5 Corporate efforts for livelihood promotionIndia’s large companies have made several efforts at livelihood promotion. These can be broadlyclassified into three categories (i) as philanthropic efforts, through charitable Trusts (ii) as corporate34
Overviewsocial responsibility (CSR) cells or societies and (iii) as part of their mainstream business activities byinvolving the poor in the value chain. As Fig 1.8 below indicates, most private sector activity generatesboth business and developmental benefits. However, most regular business activity generates little ofdevelopmental benefit and much more of business benefit. In contrast, corporate philanthropy generatesmore developmental benefit than regular business activity but yields relatively little business benefit. Thisin turn constrains the amount of resources that businesses can put into corporate philanthropy.Fig 1.8: Types of Relationships based on <strong>Development</strong> OrientationCorporate social responsibility is an intermediate paradigm that tries to restore the balance between regularbusiness activity and corporate philanthropy and succeeds in increasing the developmental benefit ofbusinesses, without reducing, and sometimes increasing the business benefit. However, an even betterstrategy is involving the poor in business value chain.The outstanding examples of the corporate philanthropy are the Tata Trusts, which together gave outgrants of over Rs 400 crore in 2007-08, about half of it directly funding livelihood programmes ofvarious kinds – land, water, forests, livestock, handicrafts, renewable energy, training, microfinance andthe rest mainly for health and education. Virtually all major NGOs have received funding from the TataTrusts over the years. Another example of this kind of philanthropic work is Lupin’s Human WelfareTrust in Bharatpur, Rajasthan and Bhoruka Charitable Trust in Churu, Rajasthan, supported by the TCIGroup.In the second category also, one of the top examples is the Tata Steel Rural <strong>Development</strong> Society (TSRDS),a CSR initiative around the Tata Steel plant in Jamshedpur, Jharkhand. TSRDS runs livelihood programsrelated to agriculture, irrigation, watershed and livestock development, and various income-generationprogrammes. Other examples of CSR livelihood efforts are in the Aditya Birla Group, around theircement factory in Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh and ITC Ltd around their factories in Munger, Bihar andSaharanpur, UP.Corporatesocialresponsibility isan intermediateparadigm thattries to restorethe balancebetween regularbusiness activityand corporatephilanthropyand succeeds inincreasing thedevelopmentalbenefit ofbusinesses,withoutreducing, andsometimesincreasing thebusiness benefit.One the best examples of doing livelihood promotion through involving the poor in the value chain isITC Ltd’s ‘e-Choupal’ which is a village-level agricultural commodity procurement platform, predicatedon giving the farmer a fair price, comparable to the mandi, but at his doorstep. This direct purchase givesthe farmer an option to sell when he thinks the price is good, rather than be forced to do so, once he hastaken his produce to the mandi. ITC saves dual transportation cost by carting the produce direct to itsprocessing factories, apart from being assured a loyal supply base of farmers. In a different effort, ITC hasalso farmed out the production of its Mangaldeep brand of agarbattis to SHGs formed by NGOs.Another example is FabIndia, a handloom and handicraft product marketing chain, which sources itsproducts from thousands of rural weavers and craftsperson all over India, many formed with NGOsupport. In Madhya Pradesh’s Khandwa region, BioRe Ltd works with over 10,000 cotton farmers to35
- Page 3 and 4: State of India’s Livelihoods :The
- Page 5 and 6: ChapterPage NoForeword 6Preface 8Ab
- Page 8: ForewordAs a part of its microfinan
- Page 11 and 12: employment growth, these sectors we
- Page 14: RIAARMKRRBRSVYSCSC/STsSCPSCSPSERPSE
- Page 20 and 21: Chapter Iresponse, risks and shocks
- Page 23 and 24: OverviewTable 1.2 Employment and Un
- Page 25 and 26: OverviewA recent paper by Arjun Sen
- Page 27: Overview4. How is the livelihood st
- Page 31 and 32: Overview5.2 Manmade constraints - i
- Page 33 and 34: Overviewthe late 1980s, these two m
- Page 35: OverviewIn the 1970s, the Chipko mo
- Page 39 and 40: OverviewBox 1.3 Bihar - Underdevelo
- Page 42 and 43: 4040
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter IIAn enumeration of the dep
- Page 46 and 47: Chapter IIBox 2.1 Macro Level Livel
- Page 48 and 49: Chapter IIIn addition to the above,
- Page 50 and 51: Chapter IIFig 2.1: Poverty Ratio am
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter IIPoormigrantlabouroften su
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter IIInterestingly, the Govern
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter IIThe effective cost of nat
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter IIsector and thereby casual
- Page 60 and 61: Chapter IIReferences1. Aiyar , Swam
- Page 62 and 63: Chapter IIIto, the vulnerability co
- Page 64 and 65: Chapter IIIIt would be useful here
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter IIIof new employment opport
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter IIIinterest subvention - wo
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter III6. The 11th Plan propose
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter IIIBox 3.5: Rural Business
- Page 74 and 75: Chapter III9. The achievement of ge
- Page 76 and 77: Chapter IIIaid. The Plan also seeks
- Page 78 and 79: Chapter IIIand health. They point o
- Page 80 and 81: Chapter IIIReferences1. Ambasta, Pr
- Page 82 and 83: 8080
- Page 84 and 85: Chapter IVtransport, storage, commu
- Page 86 and 87:
Chapter IVing of ‘English Speakin
- Page 88 and 89:
Chapter IVWhile these livelihoods h
- Page 90 and 91:
Chapter IVTable 4.6 Employment with
- Page 92 and 93:
Chapter IVConstruction requires no
- Page 94 and 95:
Chapter IVgains in manufacturing ha
- Page 96 and 97:
Chapter IV10. A Spatial Perspective
- Page 98 and 99:
Chapter IVA quick glance at some of
- Page 100 and 101:
Chapter IV12. Once a watershed is d
- Page 102:
Chapter IVThrougha range ofschemes
- Page 105 and 106:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 107 and 108:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 109 and 110:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 111 and 112:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 113 and 114:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 115 and 116:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 117 and 118:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 119 and 120:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 121 and 122:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 123 and 124:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 125 and 126:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 127 and 128:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 129 and 130:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 131 and 132:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 133 and 134:
Civil Society InitiativesChapter VI
- Page 135 and 136:
Civil Society InitiativesThe human
- Page 137 and 138:
Civil Society Initiativesso far has
- Page 139 and 140:
Civil Society Initiativesan 8 per c
- Page 141 and 142:
Civil Society InitiativesThe cooper
- Page 143 and 144:
Civil Society Initiativeslimited ir
- Page 145 and 146:
Civil Society Initiativesintelligen
- Page 147 and 148:
Civil Society InitiativesOutboard M
- Page 149 and 150:
Civil Society InitiativesCase Study
- Page 151 and 152:
Civil Society InitiativesReferences
- Page 153 and 154:
The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 155 and 156:
The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 157 and 158:
The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 159 and 160:
The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 161 and 162:
The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 163 and 164:
The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 165 and 166:
The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 167 and 168:
The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 169 and 170:
The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 172 and 173:
Chapter VIII170
- Page 174 and 175:
Chapter VIIIcountry that make the e
- Page 176 and 177:
Chapter VIIIFig 8.4: All-India area
- Page 178 and 179:
Chapter VIIIWhen commercial crops l
- Page 180 and 181:
Chapter VIIIunit of risk settlement
- Page 182 and 183:
Chapter VIIIPublic capitalformation
- Page 184 and 185:
Chapter VIII8. Integrated Rural Dev
- Page 186 and 187:
Chapter VIIIAn expertpanel ‘sreco
- Page 188 and 189:
Chapter VIIIHowever as final wage s
- Page 190:
188
- Page 193 and 194:
appENDIX TableTable A.1.3: Distribu
- Page 195 and 196:
appENDIX TableEmploymentEmploymentG
- Page 197 and 198:
appENDIX TableTable 2: Employment S
- Page 199 and 200:
appENDIX TableTable 4: State Wise G
- Page 201 and 202:
appENDIX TableTable-7: Distribution
- Page 203 and 204:
appENDIX TableDams and Displacement
- Page 205 and 206:
appENDIX TableFig. A.3.2: High Pote
- Page 207 and 208:
appENDIX TableTable A.3.2Table 2: S
- Page 209 and 210:
appENDIX TableChapter IV - ANNEX TA
- Page 211 and 212:
appENDIX TableAnnex A.5.1Backward R
- Page 213 and 214:
appENDIX TableAnnex A.5.3Some UNDP
- Page 215 and 216:
appENDIX TableGross Value of Output
- Page 217 and 218:
Mona DikshitMona Dikshit has been a