Chapter VIIIunit of risk settlement. The problem pertains to the costs involved in assessing the risks. The existinginsurance products do not address the individual risks.There are various elements that affect the yield starting with the quality of the seed used and the germination.The growth parameters can be hampered by temperature, rainfall, pest attack and the amount offertilisers used. Except rainfall and pest attack all other parameters pertain to the individual enterpriseof the farmer, while what is compensated is only the collective output. It is necessary to break up therisk elements into measurable and identifiable units. Even then, assessment at an individual farm levelis difficult.Temperature and rainfall risks were experimented with, but this requires investments in weather stations.In order to effectively cover the risk, given the nature of land holding and fragmentation, the solutionlies in adopting a self-help group like approach to assess losses. However, this is very complex and hencedifficult to implement. Nevertheless, assessing losses at least at the gram panchayat level might improvethe confidence of the farmers.It is clear thatthe Indianfarmer is at thereceiving end.He is in anenterprise wherethe entrepreneuris not insulatedfrom the enterprise.From the above discussion it is clear that the Indian farmer is at the receiving end. He is in an enterprisewhere the entrepreneur is not insulated from the enterprise. While in the formal industrial sector,due to the limited liability clause, the entrepreneur is generally insulated from failure, this is not so inagriculture. The inappropriate risk mitigation products also indicate that there are no effective externalmeans of covering this element.The other risk pertains to the price risk, which also hurts the farmer and makes him vulnerable. Pricevolatility could somewhat be addressed if commodity trading is opened up for small lots where thefarmers could take cover. However, there is a need to build safety nets so that they do not end up usingthe commodity exchanges for speculative purposes.Increased inputs do not necessarily translate into better prices. Even if the returns increase, they may notbe in proportion to the increase in costs. While farmers do not get adequate price, the risks have gonebeyond weather and natural calamities to input induced crop failure. In Indian agriculture the relationshipbetween risk and return is stacked against the farmer. If the yield is good, there is no assurance thatthe price would be good. Therefore while there is a limit to the upside returns, the downside risks canbe as high as 100 per cent of the investments, and thus cumulate in a misery as experienced by farmerhouseholds that have seen distress and suicide.6. There is an overwhelming feeling in policy circles that agrarian distresscan be addressed by unclogging the supply of formal creditWhile agriculture is grappling with several complex issues, one area that is receiving due policy attentionis agricultural credit. A study by the Planning Commission quoted in the Economic Survey (2007-’08)indicates that except for enhanced credit, other variables have not grown proportionately. There seems tobe an overwhelming feeling in the policy circles that the fundamental issues in agriculture and problemsthat lead to distress could be addressed by unclogging the supply of formal credit. While this is indeed awelcome step, we have to realise that indebtedness is only a manifestation of other underlying problems.If we do not address the basic problem, we will continue to do work on the periphery and this will notmake any significant impact on the livelihoods of the poor. Before discussing the details of agriculturalcredit, let’s put the issues a bit more in perspective. It is clear that distress is a manifestation of multiplecauses. In fact, studies indicate that distress is not necessarily related to extreme poverty (Gill and Singh2006 5 , Satish, 2006 6 ). Studies by Krishna (2003) 7 indicate that the reasons (such as crop failure, health,178
Agrarian Distress and Rural Credit: Peeling the Onionlitigation, etc.) for distress or for slipping back into poverty could be different from the reasons (suchas livelihood diversification) for escaping poverty. Therefore the solutions to the problem cannot befocused only on the supply of credit.It is difficult to establish a causal relationship to show that the increased supply and administered pricingof credit will help in increasing agricultural productivity and the well-being of farmer households. Whysuch a relationship is difficult to establish is detailed below:1. Credit is a sub-component of the total investments made in agriculture. The investments come froma basket of sources ranging from non-monetised investments such as the farmer’s labour, saved seeds,use of local resources for pest control and fertilisers; and monetised investments that include boththe savings of the agriculturist and borrowings. Borrowings could in fact be from multiple sourcesin the formal and informal space. We shall consider only a part of this sub-component -- borrowingfrom formal sources, in order to establish the causality. With data available largely from the formalsources of credit and indications that formal credit as a proportion of total indebtedness is goingdown, it becomes that much more difficult to establish causality.2. The diversity in cropping patterns, holding sizes, productivity, regional variations also make it difficultto establish such causality for agriculture or rural sector as a whole, even if the data was available.It is difficultto establisha causalrelationshipto show thatthe increasedsupply andadministeredpricing ofcredit will helpin increasingagriculturalproductivityand the wellbeingof farmerhouseholds.While looking at the productivity of agricultural and rural credit, it might be pertinent to review threeimportant papers that touch on this theme.An important paper that examines the possible relationship is by Burgess and Pandey [2003]. 8 Theauthors, using panel data on rural poverty and spread of bank branches, argue that increase in accessto credit has helped reduce rural poverty. They conclude that the fact that banks open branches makesformal credit accessible and that in the long run has a positive impact on poverty. To illustrate theirargument, they contrast the poverty rates with the pre- and post-liberalisation periods (when the conditionto open more branches in unbanked areas was dispensed with). While establishing their argumentthey also cite others [Eastwood and Kohli, 1999] who argue that the expansion of branches actuallyenhanced the lending to the rural small-scale sector where the growth was faster. Thus it is possible totake these independent conclusions together to indicate that the positive impact on poverty might havecome from the non-farm sector. In fact the authors argue that market forces possibly may not take careof the poor and backward areas by providing a counter example from microfinance, which has grownlargely without large geographic target setting from the State. They cite evidence that microfinance is notsuccessful in reaching backward areas. So the thrust of Burgess and Pandey is that in order to addresspoverty, it is necessary to have formal banking outlets. However the impacts on poverty seem to comefrom non-primary sectors like enterprise and the resultant wage employment that these enterprises generate.They also argue that since banks provide a complete suite of financial products, including savings,they are more effective than pure credit institutions. However the paper does not provide evidence ofa link between credit and agriculture.Vaidyanathan (2006) 9 examines both capital formation in agriculture and also the type of investmentscurrently being made in agriculture in the context of farmer suicides. His paper also does not indicateany direct relationship between investments and productivity. In fact he argues that some of the recenttrends in investment in agriculture are ill conceived and thus may lead to a negative spiral. He cites thecase of increased indebtedness of farmers towards both formal and informal sources in cash crops5Gill, Anita and Singh, Lakhwinder (2006): Farmers’ Suicides and Response of Public Policy: Evidence, Diagnosis and Alternatives from Punjab.Economic and Political Weekly, June 30, 2006.6Satish P (2006): Institutional Credit, Indebtedness and Suicides in Punjab. Economic and Political Weekly. June 30, 2006.7Krishna, A. (2003): Falling into Poverty: Other Side of Poverty Reduction. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 6, pp. 533-542.8Burgess, Robin and Rohini Pandey [2003]: Do Banks Matter: Evidence from Indian Social Banking Experiment. BREAD Working Paper.No37.9Vaidyanathan A (2006): Farmer Suicides and Agrarian Crisis Economic and Political Weekly. Vol 41 No.38, September 23rd. pp.4009-4013179
- Page 3 and 4:
State of India’s Livelihoods :The
- Page 5 and 6:
ChapterPage NoForeword 6Preface 8Ab
- Page 8:
ForewordAs a part of its microfinan
- Page 11 and 12:
employment growth, these sectors we
- Page 14:
RIAARMKRRBRSVYSCSC/STsSCPSCSPSERPSE
- Page 20 and 21:
Chapter Iresponse, risks and shocks
- Page 23 and 24:
OverviewTable 1.2 Employment and Un
- Page 25 and 26:
OverviewA recent paper by Arjun Sen
- Page 27:
Overview4. How is the livelihood st
- Page 31 and 32:
Overview5.2 Manmade constraints - i
- Page 33 and 34:
Overviewthe late 1980s, these two m
- Page 35 and 36:
OverviewIn the 1970s, the Chipko mo
- Page 37 and 38:
Overviewsocial responsibility (CSR)
- Page 39 and 40:
OverviewBox 1.3 Bihar - Underdevelo
- Page 42 and 43:
4040
- Page 44 and 45:
Chapter IIAn enumeration of the dep
- Page 46 and 47:
Chapter IIBox 2.1 Macro Level Livel
- Page 48 and 49:
Chapter IIIn addition to the above,
- Page 50 and 51:
Chapter IIFig 2.1: Poverty Ratio am
- Page 52 and 53:
Chapter IIPoormigrantlabouroften su
- Page 54 and 55:
Chapter IIInterestingly, the Govern
- Page 56 and 57:
Chapter IIThe effective cost of nat
- Page 58 and 59:
Chapter IIsector and thereby casual
- Page 60 and 61:
Chapter IIReferences1. Aiyar , Swam
- Page 62 and 63:
Chapter IIIto, the vulnerability co
- Page 64 and 65:
Chapter IIIIt would be useful here
- Page 66 and 67:
Chapter IIIof new employment opport
- Page 68 and 69:
Chapter IIIinterest subvention - wo
- Page 70 and 71:
Chapter III6. The 11th Plan propose
- Page 72 and 73:
Chapter IIIBox 3.5: Rural Business
- Page 74 and 75:
Chapter III9. The achievement of ge
- Page 76 and 77:
Chapter IIIaid. The Plan also seeks
- Page 78 and 79:
Chapter IIIand health. They point o
- Page 80 and 81:
Chapter IIIReferences1. Ambasta, Pr
- Page 82 and 83:
8080
- Page 84 and 85:
Chapter IVtransport, storage, commu
- Page 86 and 87:
Chapter IVing of ‘English Speakin
- Page 88 and 89:
Chapter IVWhile these livelihoods h
- Page 90 and 91:
Chapter IVTable 4.6 Employment with
- Page 92 and 93:
Chapter IVConstruction requires no
- Page 94 and 95:
Chapter IVgains in manufacturing ha
- Page 96 and 97:
Chapter IV10. A Spatial Perspective
- Page 98 and 99:
Chapter IVA quick glance at some of
- Page 100 and 101:
Chapter IV12. Once a watershed is d
- Page 102:
Chapter IVThrougha range ofschemes
- Page 105 and 106:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 107 and 108:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 109 and 110:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 111 and 112:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 113 and 114:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 115 and 116:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 117 and 118:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 119 and 120:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 121 and 122:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 123 and 124:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 125 and 126:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 127 and 128:
Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 129 and 130: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 131 and 132: Public Systems: Major central gover
- Page 133 and 134: Civil Society InitiativesChapter VI
- Page 135 and 136: Civil Society InitiativesThe human
- Page 137 and 138: Civil Society Initiativesso far has
- Page 139 and 140: Civil Society Initiativesan 8 per c
- Page 141 and 142: Civil Society InitiativesThe cooper
- Page 143 and 144: Civil Society Initiativeslimited ir
- Page 145 and 146: Civil Society Initiativesintelligen
- Page 147 and 148: Civil Society InitiativesOutboard M
- Page 149 and 150: Civil Society InitiativesCase Study
- Page 151 and 152: Civil Society InitiativesReferences
- Page 153 and 154: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 155 and 156: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 157 and 158: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 159 and 160: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 161 and 162: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 163 and 164: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 165 and 166: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 167 and 168: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 169 and 170: The Contribution of Corporate Suppl
- Page 172 and 173: Chapter VIII170
- Page 174 and 175: Chapter VIIIcountry that make the e
- Page 176 and 177: Chapter VIIIFig 8.4: All-India area
- Page 178 and 179: Chapter VIIIWhen commercial crops l
- Page 182 and 183: Chapter VIIIPublic capitalformation
- Page 184 and 185: Chapter VIII8. Integrated Rural Dev
- Page 186 and 187: Chapter VIIIAn expertpanel ‘sreco
- Page 188 and 189: Chapter VIIIHowever as final wage s
- Page 190: 188
- Page 193 and 194: appENDIX TableTable A.1.3: Distribu
- Page 195 and 196: appENDIX TableEmploymentEmploymentG
- Page 197 and 198: appENDIX TableTable 2: Employment S
- Page 199 and 200: appENDIX TableTable 4: State Wise G
- Page 201 and 202: appENDIX TableTable-7: Distribution
- Page 203 and 204: appENDIX TableDams and Displacement
- Page 205 and 206: appENDIX TableFig. A.3.2: High Pote
- Page 207 and 208: appENDIX TableTable A.3.2Table 2: S
- Page 209 and 210: appENDIX TableChapter IV - ANNEX TA
- Page 211 and 212: appENDIX TableAnnex A.5.1Backward R
- Page 213 and 214: appENDIX TableAnnex A.5.3Some UNDP
- Page 215 and 216: appENDIX TableGross Value of Output
- Page 217 and 218: Mona DikshitMona Dikshit has been a