Preamble Narratives and Social Memory - Universidade do Minho

Comissões Unitárias de Mulheres do Porto: Recreating the Memory of a Social MovementCátia Lopes, Joana Correia, João Caramelo & Teresa Medinathe protagonists that brought those documents to life and allowed to recreate its memory.However, during the performed group interviews, the documents and chronology previouslyproduced served as support to help unleash women’s memory on events. In this sense, theinitial process of document analysis was crucial not only for researchers to draft an overviewof the history and memory available but also for the interviewed women to identifywith that past, actions and motivations that mobilized them.Oral History Methodology and the Recreation of a Memory about the UnitaryCommissions of Women from Porto Social MovementThe present research was developed and justified in the context of theoretical andmethodological choices that are underpinned in the methodology of oral history and lifestories. One of the main objectives of our work is the preservation of the memory of theUnitary Commissions of Women From Porto by sharing materials and life stories of theprotagonists. We also tried to construct, using the oral history methodology, a glimpse intoa historical, cultural and social past tinted by the memories of these women who not onlylived, but who also performed it. Moreover, since these memories are part of their life stories,we sought to understand how they integrate it into a continuum, not necessarily straight,between past and future. This would build a broader and more engaged collective memoryof the past, allowing more points of view to be presented in a social reality that should notbe built from a single voice. In the words of Ferrarotti (1983, pp. 50-51), our life story containsthe history of the social system present in our actions, aspirations and behaviors, i.e.we imply the social through a synthetic introjection which deconstructs andrestructures giving at the same time psychological forms. [However] (...) therelationship that binds an act to a social structure is not linear, the strict relationshipbetween social history and life is certainly not a mechanical determinism.(...) The individual is not a social epiphenomenon. Compared to structures andto the history of a society, it arises as an active pole, stands out as syntheticpraxis. Far from reflecting the social, the individual appropriates, mediates, filtersand retranslates it by projecting in another dimension, that, ultimately, is itssubjectivity.Oral history as a methodology can be defined by its purpose: a cooperative, interdisciplinarywork aiming at building history by assigning a central place to the voices of those whomade ​history by living it (Thompson, 1988). Thus, the search for historical, social and culturalknowledge from oral testimonies allows knowledge to be built not only from the study ofofficial documents. Due to their status, official documents tend to be considered more importantin the preservation of the memory than oral testimonies. Being considered personal, oraltestimonies are not recognized as national or social matters. However, the history of placesand societies rises from people’s stories. In other words, we make history. Thus, oral historyallows restoring heterogeneous and subjective condition to the narrated events.We should take example of this from the ardina’s statue, placed in the center of Portoand well known of city visitors. To tourists this object is simply presented as a newsvendorleaning over a mail post. However, this statue holds another symbology shared with usduring this research by one of the interviewees: the ardina is the symbol of a professionNarratives and social memory: theoretical and methodological approaches317