12.07.2015 Views

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OP-3-6H 2 PRODUCTION BY STEAM REFORMING OF BIOETHANOLIlenia Rossetti, Cesare Biffi, Gian Franco Tantardini, Lucio ForniDip. Chimica Fisica ed Elettrochimica, Università degli Studi di Milano, v. C.Golgi 19,I-20133 Milano, Italy. Fax: +39-02-50314300, e-mail: ilenia.rossetti@unimi.itNi-based catalysts have been produced by flame pyrolysis (FP) and tested for thesteam reforming (SR) <strong>of</strong> ethanol. The catalysts have been supported on Al 2 O 3 (forcomparison with commercial samples), TiO 2 and La 2 O 3 , with metal loading between5 and 15 wt%. Two sets <strong>of</strong> samples have been prepared: the former by impregnation<strong>of</strong> a Ni precursor on the FP-prepared support, the latter by direct FP synthesis. Thecatalysts were characterised by XRD, N 2 adsorption-desorption, TPD-TPR-TPO,SEM. The activity tests were performed at atmospheric pressure and at threedifferent temperatures (500-750°C) in a continuous tubular reactor on 0.5 g <strong>of</strong>catalyst, pre-activated at 800°C in H 2 flow. Water and ethanol have been fed in 3:1molar ratio, with variable VHSV. Data have been collected for up to 100 h on-streamon each sample, to check for catalyst deactivation.The FP synthesis led to nanosize particles (20-60 nm), characterised by suitablethermal resistance for this high temperature process. Independently <strong>of</strong> thepreparation route, all the samples showed higher reducibility with respect to literaturedata. The activity tests showed full ethanol conversion at 750°C, with carbon balanceclosing to ±6 mol%. H 2 molar fraction in the products was usually higher than 0.70,whereas CO and CO 2 were strongly dependent on the operating conditions andcatalyst formulation. At low temperature a contribution <strong>of</strong> the water gas shift reactionis indeed expected, increasing H 2 yield and lowering CO concentration in the outletgas. This is especially desired for two reasons. On one hand, a low operatingtemperature decreases the thermal input to the process. On the other hand, if H 2 is tobe fed to fuel cells, careful purification from CO is required, particularly if a PEM-FCis used, so that the lowering as much as possible the CO concentration in thereformate gas is welcome.Some undesirable by-products such as acetaldehyde and methane wereobserved occasionally at low temperature only and their concentration was virtuallyabsent when increasing contact time. By increasing again reaction temperature a fullrecovery <strong>of</strong> activity and optimal carbon balance were always obtained.74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!