<strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Operation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Condition</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Enterprise</strong>Comparison to <strong>the</strong> industry level enables to establish <strong>the</strong> relation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> indicators<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysed enterprise to <strong>the</strong> indicators <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r enterprise operating in <strong>the</strong> sameindustry. For example, return on equity in o<strong>the</strong>r enterprises <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same industry is 25% onaverage <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> this indicator (in <strong>the</strong> analysed enterprise) <strong>of</strong> 6% isconsiderably lower than in <strong>the</strong> industry on average. The industry level ratios can be used toevaluate <strong>the</strong>ir dynamics.By using comparison with <strong>the</strong> industry level <strong>the</strong> following limitations need to betaken into account: Even if two enterprises are homogenous, <strong>the</strong>y may be incomparable. Let us assumethat we are comparing two information technology enterprises. The main area <strong>of</strong>operations for one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se enterprises could be <strong>the</strong> installation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> check-outsystems for supermarkets <strong>and</strong> hypermarkets, i.e., <strong>the</strong> enterprise installs specialisedpoint-<strong>of</strong>-sale systems. The o<strong>the</strong>r enterprise, on its turn, is <strong>of</strong>fering specialisedsupermarket accounting s<strong>of</strong>tware. And in <strong>the</strong> result <strong>the</strong> business operations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>two at <strong>the</strong> first glance similar enterprises are not comparable. The large enterprises <strong>of</strong>ten operate in several industries, i.e., <strong>the</strong>y formconglomerates. In some separate industries <strong>the</strong> indicators usually differ, i.e., <strong>the</strong>yhave different returns, level <strong>of</strong> risk etc. indicators. In such cases <strong>the</strong> financialstatements <strong>of</strong> enterprises are not mutually comparable. Figures <strong>of</strong> enterprise financial statements may be incomparable also due todifferent accounting, stock evaluation methods, fixed asset depreciation estimates,overhead apportionment etc. methods. However, it is admitted that <strong>the</strong> most securecriterion for assessment <strong>of</strong> business performance is <strong>the</strong> comparison with <strong>the</strong>industry level. Tendency (trend) analysis – establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> change dynamics <strong>of</strong> in indicators.Trend analysis – comparison <strong>of</strong> every position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> statement with <strong>the</strong> previousperiods <strong>and</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir trend. Trend is established as <strong>the</strong> basic tendencyin <strong>the</strong> dynamics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> indicator without occasional impacting factors <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>peculiarities <strong>of</strong> individual periods. With <strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong> trend <strong>the</strong> meaningfulness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>indicators in <strong>the</strong> future is created, respectively, <strong>the</strong> forecast analysis is performed. Factor analysis – shows <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> individual factors on <strong>the</strong> operations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>enterprise. The individual enterprise performance measures are interrelated <strong>and</strong>affect each o<strong>the</strong>r. Economic indicators are most <strong>of</strong>ten expressed as a ma<strong>the</strong>maticalcorrelation <strong>of</strong> certain factors (differences, sums, multiplication, <strong>and</strong> division).Dependent on <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> factors <strong>the</strong>y are subdivided in <strong>the</strong> main <strong>and</strong> lesssignificant factors. The main factors should be given more attention in analysis.Therefore <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> factors is <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> certain factors(causes) on <strong>the</strong> total resulting indicator, when performing this analysis with <strong>the</strong> help<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> preset or statistic technique. Comparative analysis – comparing <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong> two enterprises or <strong>the</strong>performance <strong>of</strong> two structural units <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same enterprise. Comparison can be alsobased on calculation <strong>of</strong> different economic indicators <strong>and</strong> comparative assessmentin dynamics. Comparison allows evaluating <strong>the</strong> performance results <strong>of</strong> anenterprise, to establish <strong>the</strong> actual variances from <strong>the</strong> budgeted figures, figures from46
<strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Operation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Condition</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Enterprise</strong><strong>the</strong> previous periods or <strong>the</strong> industry average results. This method allows foridentification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> causes for such variances <strong>and</strong> to discover any reserves. Balance sheet method allows comparing mutually interrelated indicators in order todetermine <strong>and</strong> to measure how <strong>the</strong>y affect each o<strong>the</strong>r. By using this method onemust take into account that <strong>the</strong> amounts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mutually related indicators must beequal. Graphical method is a good instrument for visual illustration <strong>of</strong> various processes<strong>and</strong> tendencies as well as for <strong>the</strong> processing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> analysis. Withgraphical presentation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>the</strong> indicators can be easilydemonstrated <strong>and</strong> compared. Economic ma<strong>the</strong>matical methods are <strong>of</strong>ten used for identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> best optionby taking business-related decisions in specific circumstances. St<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> predicative simulation. St<strong>and</strong>ard simulation models. These types <strong>of</strong>models allow comparing <strong>the</strong> actual outcome <strong>of</strong> enterprise performance withprospective or expected results that are calculated in line with <strong>the</strong> budget. St<strong>and</strong>ardmodels basically are used in internal financial analysis, in which st<strong>and</strong>ards for eachcost item are assessed as well as <strong>the</strong> actual data variances from <strong>the</strong>se st<strong>and</strong>ards. Tosome extent analysis is based on <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> models with strictly determined factors.Predicative models These models are forecasts by character. These are used inprojection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enterprise revenue <strong>and</strong> financial status.Test your knowledge:1) Name <strong>and</strong> describe <strong>the</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> enterprise performance analysis.2) What sources <strong>of</strong> information are used in <strong>the</strong> enterprise performance analysis?3) What are <strong>the</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> financial analysis?4) Name <strong>the</strong> users <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> enterprise performance analysis results, <strong>the</strong>ir input in <strong>the</strong>operations <strong>of</strong> an enterprise <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir claims from <strong>the</strong> performance results.5) Name what are <strong>the</strong> financial measures that <strong>the</strong> enterprise management, <strong>the</strong> owners,<strong>the</strong> lenders are interested in?6) Name <strong>and</strong> describe at least five quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative measures for attainment<strong>of</strong> shareholders’ goals <strong>of</strong> an enterprise?7) During performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> qualitative analysis <strong>of</strong> your enterprise prepare <strong>the</strong>questionnaires according to example given above.8) What decisions can be taken for improvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> situation?9) Substantiate, why <strong>the</strong> internal analysis <strong>of</strong> enterprise performance containsconfidential information?10) Name <strong>and</strong> describe <strong>the</strong> methods <strong>of</strong> enterprise performance analysis.11) What are <strong>the</strong> horizontal variances <strong>of</strong> financial indicators?12) Into what groups can <strong>the</strong> ratios used in practical financial analysis be subdivided?13) What techniques for comparing <strong>of</strong> financial results that can be used in enterpriseperformance analysis? Which <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m can be most easily used by <strong>the</strong> enterpriseanalysts?47