12.07.2015 Views

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: A First Course in Curves and Surfaces

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: A First Course in Curves and Surfaces

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: A First Course in Curves and Surfaces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104 Chapter 3. <strong>Surfaces</strong>: Further TopicsTheorem <strong>and</strong> is the three-dimensional analogue of the result of Exercise A.2.5: The volume enclosedby the parametrized surface x is given byvol(V )= 1 ∫∫x · ndA.3 DThus, the method of ∫∫Lagrange multipliers suggests that for a surface of least area there must be aconstant λ so that (2H − λ)ξ · ndA =0for all variations ξ with ξ = 0 on ∂D. Once aga<strong>in</strong>,Dus<strong>in</strong>g a two-dimensional analogue of Exercise 2, we see that 2H − λ =0<strong>and</strong> hence H must beconstant. (Also see Exercise 6.) We conclude:Theorem 4.3. Among all (parametrized) surfaces conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a fixed volume, the one of leastarea has constant mean curvature.In particular, a soap bubble should have constant mean curvature. A nontrivial theorem ofAlex<strong>and</strong>rov, analogous to Theorem 3.5 of Chapter 2, states that a smooth, compact surface ofconstant mean curvature must be a sphere. So soap bubbles should be spheres. How do youexpla<strong>in</strong> “double bubbles”?Example 2. If we ask which surfaces of revolution have constant mean curvature H 0 , thestatement of Exercise 2.2.19a. leads us to the differential equationh ′′(1 + h ′2 ) 3/2 − 1h(1 + h ′2 ) 1/2 =2H 0.(Here the surface is obta<strong>in</strong>ed by rotat<strong>in</strong>g the graph of h about the coord<strong>in</strong>ate axis.) We can rewritethis equation as follows:<strong>and</strong>, multiply<strong>in</strong>g through by h ′ ,−hh ′′ +(1+h ′2 )(1 + h ′2 ) 3/2 +2H 0 h =0(†)h ′ −hh′′ +(1+h ′2 )(1 + h ′2 ) 3/2 +2H 0 hh ′ =0( )h ′(1√ +2H 01+h ′2 2 h2) ′ =0h√ + H 0h 2 = const.1+h ′2We now show that such functions have a wonderful geometric characterization, as suggested<strong>in</strong> Figure 4.2. Start<strong>in</strong>g with an ellipse with semimajor axis a <strong>and</strong> semim<strong>in</strong>or axis b, weconsiderFigure 4.2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!