12.07.2015 Views

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: A First Course in Curves and Surfaces

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: A First Course in Curves and Surfaces

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: A First Course in Curves and Surfaces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§3. The Codazzi <strong>and</strong> Gauss Equations <strong>and</strong> the Fundamental Theorem of Surface Theory 590MPFigure 3.2The reader is asked <strong>in</strong> Exercise 16 to f<strong>in</strong>d surfaces of revolution of constant curvature. Thereare, <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gly, many nonobvious examples. However, if we restrict ourselves to smooth surfaces,we have the follow<strong>in</strong>g beautifulTheorem 3.5 (Liebmann). If M is a smooth, compact surface of constant Gaussian curvatureK, then K>0 <strong>and</strong> M must be a sphere of radius 1/ √ K.We will need the follow<strong>in</strong>gLemma 3.6 (Hilbert). Suppose P is not an umbilic po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>and</strong> k 1 (P ) >k 2 (P ). Suppose k 1 hasalocal maximum at P <strong>and</strong> k 2 has a local m<strong>in</strong>imum at P . Then K(P ) ≤ 0.Proof. We work <strong>in</strong> a “pr<strong>in</strong>cipal” coord<strong>in</strong>ate parametrization, 4 so that the u-curves are l<strong>in</strong>esof curvature with pr<strong>in</strong>cipal curvature k 1 <strong>and</strong> the v-curves are l<strong>in</strong>es of curvature with pr<strong>in</strong>cipalcurvature k 2 . Then we have k 1 = l/E, k 2 = n/G, <strong>and</strong> F = m =0.Bythe Codazzi equations <strong>and</strong>the equations (‡) onp.55,we have(⋆)l v = 1 2 E v(k 1 + k 2 ) <strong>and</strong> n u = 1 2 G u(k 1 + k 2 ).S<strong>in</strong>ce l = k 1 E,wehavel v =(k 1 ) v E + k 1 E v ; similarly, n u =(k 2 ) u G + k 2 G u . Us<strong>in</strong>g the equations(⋆), we then obta<strong>in</strong>(k 1 ) v = E v2E (k 2 − k 1 ) <strong>and</strong> (k 2 ) u = G u(⋆⋆)2G (k 1 − k 2 );s<strong>in</strong>ce k 1 ≠ k 2 <strong>and</strong> (k 1 ) v =(k 2 ) u =0atP ,we<strong>in</strong>fer that E v = G u =0atP .Differentiat<strong>in</strong>g the equations (⋆⋆), <strong>and</strong> remember<strong>in</strong>g that (k 1 ) u =(k 2 ) v =0atP as well, wehave at P :(k 1 ) vv = E vv2E (k 2 − k 1 ) ≤ 0 (because k 1 has a local maximum at P )(k 2 ) uu = G uu2G (k 1 − k 2 ) ≥ 0 (because k 2 has a local m<strong>in</strong>imum at P ),4 S<strong>in</strong>ce locally there are no umbilic po<strong>in</strong>ts, the existence of such a parametrization is an immediate consequenceof Theorem 3.3 of the Appendix.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!