76 Chapter 3. <strong>Surfaces</strong>: Further TopicsS<strong>in</strong>ce (much as <strong>in</strong> the case of curves) e 1 <strong>and</strong> e 2 give an orthonormal basis for the tangent space ofour surface at each po<strong>in</strong>t, all the <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic curvature <strong>in</strong>formation (such as given by the Christoffelsymbols) is encapsulated <strong>in</strong> know<strong>in</strong>g how e 1 twists towards e 2 as we move around the surface. Inparticular, if α(t) =x(u(t),v(t)), a ≤ t ≤ b, isaparametrized curve, we can setφ 12 (t) = d dt(e1 (u(t),v(t)) ) · e 2 (u(t),v(t)),which we may write more casually as e ′ 1 (t) · e 2(t), with the underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that everyth<strong>in</strong>g must bedone <strong>in</strong> terms of the parametrization. We emphasize that φ 12 depends <strong>in</strong> an essential way on theparametrized curve α. Perhaps it’s better, then, to writeφ 12 = ∇ α ′e 1 · e 2 .Note, moreover, that the proof of Proposition 4.2 of Chapter 2 shows that ∇ α ′e 2 · e 1 = −φ 12 <strong>and</strong>∇ α ′e 1 · e 1 = ∇ α ′e 2 · e 2 =0. (Why?)Remark. Although the notation seems cumbersome, it rem<strong>in</strong>ds us that φ 12 is measur<strong>in</strong>g howe 1 twists towards e 2 as we move along the curve α. This notation will fit <strong>in</strong> a more general context<strong>in</strong> Section 3.Suppose now that α is a closed curve <strong>and</strong> we are <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> the holonomy around α. Ife 1 happens to be parallel along α, then the holonomy will, of course, be 0. If not, let’s considerX(t) tobethe parallel translation of e 1 along α(t) <strong>and</strong> write X(t) =cos ψ(t)e 1 + s<strong>in</strong> ψ(t)e 2 , tak<strong>in</strong>gψ(0) = 0. Then X is parallel along α if <strong>and</strong> only if0 = ∇ α ′X = ∇ α ′(cos ψe 1 + s<strong>in</strong> ψe 2 )= cos ψ∇ α ′e 1 + s<strong>in</strong> ψ∇ α ′e 2 +(− s<strong>in</strong> ψe 1 + cos ψe 2 )ψ ′= cos ψφ 12 e 2 − s<strong>in</strong> ψφ 12 e 1 +(− s<strong>in</strong> ψe 1 + cos ψe 2 )ψ ′=(φ 12 + ψ ′ )(− s<strong>in</strong> ψe 1 + cos ψe 2 ).Thus, X is parallel along α if <strong>and</strong> only if ψ ′ (t) =−φ 12 (t). We therefore conclude:Proposition 1.1. The holonomy around the closed curve C equals ∆ψ = −∫ baφ 12 (t)dt.Example 1. Back to our example of the latitude circle u = u 0 on the unit sphere. Thene 1 = x u <strong>and</strong> e 2 =(1/ s<strong>in</strong> u)x v . Ifweparametrize the curve by tak<strong>in</strong>g t = v, 0≤ t ≤ 2π, then wehave (see Example 1 of Chapter 2, Section 3)∇ α ′e 1 = ∇ α ′x u = x uv = cot u 0 x v = cos u 0 e 2 ,<strong>and</strong> so φ 12 = cos u 0 . Therefore, the holonomy around the latitude circle (oriented counterclockwise)is ∆ψ = −∫ 2π0cos u 0 dt = −2π cos u 0 , confirm<strong>in</strong>g our previous results.Note that if we wish to parametrize the curve by arclength (as will be important shortly),we take s =(s<strong>in</strong> u 0 )v, 0≤ s ≤ 2π s<strong>in</strong> u 0 . Then, with respect to this parametrization, we haveφ 12 (s) =cot u 0 . (Why?) ▽
§1. Holonomy <strong>and</strong> the Gauss-Bonnet Theorem 77e 2α ′θe 1αFigure 1.2Suppose now that α is an arclength-parametrized curve <strong>and</strong> let’s write α(s) =x(u(s),v(s)) <strong>and</strong>T(s) =α ′ (s) =cos θ(s)e 1 + s<strong>in</strong> θ(s)e 2 , s ∈ [0,L], for a C 1 function θ(s) (cf. Lemma 3.6 of Chapter1), as <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Figure 1.2. A formula fundamental for the rest of our work is the follow<strong>in</strong>g:Proposition 1.2. When α is an arclength-parametrized curve, the geodesic curvature of α isgiven byκ g (s) =φ 12 (s)+θ ′ 1(s) =2 √ (−Ev u ′ (s)+G u v ′ (s) ) + θ ′ (s).EGProof. Recall that κ g = κN · (n × T) =T ′ · (n × T). Now, s<strong>in</strong>ce T = cos θe 1 + s<strong>in</strong> θe 2 ,n × T = − s<strong>in</strong> θe 1 + cos θe 2 (why?), <strong>and</strong> soκ g = ∇ T T · (− s<strong>in</strong> θe 1 + cos θe 2 )= ∇ T (cos θe 1 + s<strong>in</strong> θe 2 ) · (− s<strong>in</strong> θe 1 + cos θe 2 )= ( cos θ∇ T e 1 + s<strong>in</strong> θ∇ T e 2)· (− s<strong>in</strong> θe1 + cos θe 2 )+ ( (− s<strong>in</strong> θ)θ ′ (− s<strong>in</strong> θ)+(cos θ)θ ′ (cos θ) )= (cos 2 θ + s<strong>in</strong> 2 θ)(φ 12 + θ ′ )=φ 12 + θ ′ ,as required.Next, we have (tak<strong>in</strong>g full advantage of the orthogonality of x u <strong>and</strong> x v )φ 12 = d ( )xu x√ · √ vds E Gby the formulas (‡) onp.55.= 1 √EG(xuu u ′ + x uv v ′) · x v= 1 √EG((Γuuu x u +Γ v uux v )u ′ +(Γ u uvx u +Γ v uvx v )v ′) · x v= G √EG(Γvuu u ′ +Γ v uvv ′) =□12 √ EG(−Ev u ′ + G u v ′) ,Remark. The first equality <strong>in</strong> Proposition 1.2 should not be surpris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the least. Curvatureof a plane curve measures the rate at which its unit tangent vector turns relative to a fixed referencedirection. Similarly, the geodesic curvature of a curve <strong>in</strong> a surface measures the rate at which itsunit tangent vector turns relative to a parallel vector field along the curve; θ ′ measures its turn<strong>in</strong>grelative to e 1 , which is itself turn<strong>in</strong>g at a rate given by φ 12 ,sothe geodesic curvature is the sum ofthose two rates.