12.07.2015 Views

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: A First Course in Curves and Surfaces

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: A First Course in Curves and Surfaces

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY: A First Course in Curves and Surfaces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

§4. Covariant Differentiation, Parallel Translation, <strong>and</strong> Geodesics 71≥∫ u00√E(u)du,which is the length of the geodesic arc γ from P to Q.□(Cf. Exercise 1.3.1.)Example 7. Why is Theorem 4.5 a local statement? Well, consider a great circle on a sphere,as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.5. If we go more than halfway around, we obviously have not taken theshortest path. ▽shortestPQlongerFigure 4.5Remark. It turns out that any surface can be endowed with a metric (or distance measure)by def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the distance between any two po<strong>in</strong>ts to be the <strong>in</strong>fimum (usually, the m<strong>in</strong>imum) of thelengths of all piecewise-C 1 paths jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g them. (Although the distance measure is different fromthe Euclidean distance as the surface sits <strong>in</strong> R 3 , the topology—notion of “neighborhood”—<strong>in</strong>ducedby this metric structure is the <strong>in</strong>duced topology that the surface <strong>in</strong>herits as a subspace of R 3 .) It isa consequence of the Hopf-R<strong>in</strong>ow Theorem (see M. doCarmo, Differential Geometry of <strong>Curves</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Surfaces</strong>, Prentice Hall, 1976, p. 333, or M. Spivak, A Comprehensive Introduction to DifferentialGeometry, third edition, volume 1, Publish or Perish, Inc., 1999, p. 342) that <strong>in</strong> a surface <strong>in</strong> whichevery parametrized geodesic is def<strong>in</strong>ed for all time (a “complete” surface), every two po<strong>in</strong>ts are <strong>in</strong>fact jo<strong>in</strong>ed by a geodesic of least length. The proof of this result is quite tantaliz<strong>in</strong>g: To f<strong>in</strong>d theshortest path from P to Q, one walks around the “geodesic circle” of po<strong>in</strong>ts a small distance fromP <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ds the po<strong>in</strong>t R on it closest to Q; one then proves that the unique geodesic emanat<strong>in</strong>gfrom P that passes through R must eventually pass through Q, <strong>and</strong> there can be no shorter path.We referred earlier to two surfaces M <strong>and</strong> M ∗ as be<strong>in</strong>g globally isometric (e.g., <strong>in</strong> Example 6<strong>in</strong> Section 1). We can now give the official def<strong>in</strong>ition: There should be a function f : M → M ∗ thatestablishes a one-to-one correspondence <strong>and</strong> preserves distance—for any P, Q ∈ M, the distancebetween P <strong>and</strong> Q <strong>in</strong> M should be equal to the distance between f(P ) <strong>and</strong> f(Q) <strong>in</strong>M ∗ .EXERCISES 2.41. Determ<strong>in</strong>e the result of parallel translat<strong>in</strong>g the vector (0, 0, 1) once around the circle x 2 + y 2 =a 2 , z =0,onthe right circular cyl<strong>in</strong>der x 2 + y 2 = a 2 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!