Shrimp Farming and the Environment - Library

More documents

Recommendations

Info

LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held or Attended in 1999-2002 tofurther the Work of the Consortium.ParticipantsProducersGovt.officialsMultilateralorgsBi-lateralorgsNGOsResearchers/universitiesCommunitygroupsInvestors/FundersBuyersCertifiersTradeassociationsConsultantsSan Francisco, CA,USAMarine Working Group, Consultative Group on Biodiversity. Talkon the Consortium’s work on BMPs for shrimp aquaculture.February 10, 2000.50 # # # # #Bangkok, Thailand ISANet Annual Meeting. February 19, 2000. 40 # # # # #Bangkok, Thailand Meeting with ISANet to discuss the work of the consortium. 12 # # # #February 20, 2000.Bangkok, Thailand Meeting on Organic Shrimp Certification with Agro-Eco. February 7 # # # # #24, 2000.Bangkok, Thailand Expert consultation on the Proposed Sub-Committee onAquaculture of the Committee of Fisheries to advise the FAO onthe mandate of an aquaculture subcommittee. February 28-29,2000.35 # # # # # # #Washington, DC,USALondon, UKMohonk, NY, USAMonterey, CA, USARecife, BrazilRecife, BrazilRecife, BrazilRecife, BrazilNew London, NH,USA.Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery modeling session. March 4-5, 2000. 20 # # # #Chatham House session on Business and Biodiversity. DiscussedBMPs and shrimp aquaculture. April 3, 2000.Social Venture Network Meeting on sustainability. DiscussedBMPs using shrimp aquaculture as an example. April 13-16, 2000.SeaWeb/Packard Foundation Seafood Consumer InitiativeWorkshop. April 26-27, 2000.Meeting at Instituto Josue de Castro on shrimp aquaculture. May22, 2000.Mangrove 2000 Conference. University of Pernambuco. Talk onthe work of the consortium. May 23, 2000.Mangrove 2000 Conference. University of Pernambuco. Talk onBMPs and shrimp aquaculture development in Brazil. May 24,2000.Mangrove 2000 Conference. University of Pernambuco. Talk onthe Mexican case study of the consortium. May 24, 2000.Second International Industrial Ecology Conference: EngineeringGlobal Systems. Gordon Conference. Talk comparing theenvironmental impacts of aquaculture and fisheries. June 11-16,2000.140 # # # # # # # # # #350 # # # # # # # #55 # # # # # #60 # # # # # #250 # # # # # #200 # # # # # #150 # # # # # #130 # # # #90
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held or Attended in 1999-2002 tofurther the Work of the Consortium.ParticipantsProducersGovt.officialsMultilateralorgsBi-lateralorgsNGOsResearchers/universitiesCommunitygroupsInvestors/FundersBuyersCertifiersTradeassociationsConsultantsWashington DC,USAGeorgetown, GuyanaZurich, SwitzerlandWashington, DC,USAPanama City,PanamaLondon, UKBaja, MexicoWashington DC,USAWashington DC,USAWashington DC,USAWashington DC,USABoston, MA, USAVancouver, BC,CanadaWorld Wildlife Fund staff meeting. Presented the work of theconsortium. July 14, 2000.Addressed the President and Members of Parliament regardingnatural resource management, BMPs and marketing. September11, 2000.Addressed WWF-Switzerland Conference on the identification anduse of BMPs. October 18-19, 2000.Addressed ISANet Board on preliminary findings of theconsortium’s work. October 22-23, 2000.Fourth Latin American Aquaculture Congress and Exhibition.October 25-28, 2000.Addressed Ford Foundation Environmental Staff about the use ofBMPs to improve environmental performance, natural resourcemanagement and marketing. November 2, 2000.Pew Fellows’ Fifth Anniversary Meeting of Marine Fellows.November 5, 2000.Met with Marine Aquarium Council to discuss differences betweencertifying aquaculture and wild caught products. November 20,2000.Addressed the IFC’s agriculture and sustainability divisions onBMPs with reference to shrimp aquaculture and agriculture.November 21, 2000.Met with Inter-American Development Bank’s Multi-LateralInvestment Fund to discuss shrimp aquaculture, the use of BMPscreens for their investments, and the establishment of a tradingcompany to handle third-party certified production. November 20,2000.Met with the International Finance Committee of the World BankGroup to discuss the use of BMPs for investment screens forshrimp aquaculture, January 2001Stakeholder meeting on aquaculture development in New England,USA, January 2001Multi-stakeholder meeting on aquaculture development withparticular emphasis on VC, Colombia, January 200175 # # #150 # # # # #80 # # #12 # # #300 # # # # # # # x #25 # # # #75 # # # #4 #35 # #3 # #50 # #150 # # # # # # # # #120 # # # # # # # # #91
Page 7 and 8:
sensitivity analysis should include
Page 9 and 10:
ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
Page 11 and 12:
ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
Page 13 and 14:
same time, development is necessary
Page 15 and 16:
Current shrimp farming practice inc
Page 17 and 18:
Current status of the industryToday
Page 19 and 20:
In recent years, several major crop
Page 21:
CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
Page 24 and 25:
FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
Page 26 and 27:
FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SH
Page 28 and 29:
TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
Page 30 and 31:
Shrimp farming systems vary greatly
Page 32 and 33:
creeks, and sea-grass beds, fulfill
Page 34 and 35:
arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
Page 36 and 37:
capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
Page 38 and 39:
shrimp or high-value finfish produc
Page 40 and 41:
In more immediately practical terms
Page 42 and 43:
Disease prevention and managementDi
Page 44 and 45:
(Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
Page 46 and 47:
suitable for human consumption or f
Page 48 and 49:
• Supply and effluent canals shou
Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
Page 68 and 69: Planning and resource managementIna
Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
Page 72 and 73: Conclusions and recommendationsReco
Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASS
Page 78 and 79: • Appraisal and supervision missi
Page 80 and 81: The structure of the executive summ
Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDAT
Page 84 and 85: • Requirements and guidance for f
Page 86 and 87: EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
Page 88 and 89: ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
Page 90 and 91: • Sensitivity calculations and an
Page 92 and 93: Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
Page 94 and 95: ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
Page 96 and 97: ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
Page 98 and 99: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
Page 102 and 103: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
Page 104 and 105: BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
Page 106 and 107: Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
Page 108 and 109: Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
Page 110 and 111: Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
Page 112: World Commission on Environment and
show all

Shrimp Farming and the Environment - Library

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?