Planning <strong>and</strong> resource managementInadequacy of existing proceduresThere are few examples of well-planned shrimp farming to draw on. Although many countries haveplanning systems that have been applied to aquaculture, <strong>the</strong>y have usually been unable to applyprocedures thoroughly <strong>and</strong> consistently while facing <strong>the</strong> sheer pressure for rapid development thatsprings from <strong>the</strong> initial success of aquaculture. Sri Lanka, for example, has relatively well developedlegislation <strong>and</strong> planning procedures applicable to aquaculture development, including coastal planning<strong>and</strong> environmental assessment procedures, but unregulated development has none<strong>the</strong>less taken place,<strong>and</strong> major shrimp disease problems have occurred. One of <strong>the</strong> main problems (in Sri Lanka <strong>and</strong> manyo<strong>the</strong>r shrimp farming countries) has been <strong>the</strong> inadequacy of environmental assessment procedures.These have been undermined through illegal developments on <strong>the</strong> one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> inadequacy ofconventional EIA to cope with large numbers of small- or medium-scale developments on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r.When taken in isolation, such a development is unlikely to have a significant impact on <strong>the</strong>environment, but a large number of such projects (typical in estuarine <strong>and</strong> lagoon systems suitable forshrimp culture) is likely to have a significant cumulative impact.Planning frameworksSector-level environmental assessment (as opposed to project- or individual farm-level) linked to asector plan <strong>and</strong> a set of appropriate incentives <strong>and</strong> constraints appears to be <strong>the</strong> only way to address <strong>the</strong>problems associated with <strong>the</strong>se cumulative impacts (SEACAM 1999; GESAMP 1999). However, if <strong>the</strong>planning <strong>and</strong> regulatory framework is to address social, economic, <strong>and</strong> environmental issues in acomprehensive manner, it will need to include all elements of integrated coastal management (ICM).ICM has been widely promoted as a suitable framework for addressing <strong>the</strong> problems <strong>and</strong> issuespresented in previous chapters (Chua 1992; Chua 1997; Olsen & Coello 1995; Barg 1992; Holl<strong>and</strong>1998) <strong>and</strong> should be pursued as a long-term ideal. Unfortunately, developing comprehensive ICMplans is typically a difficult <strong>and</strong> lengthy process (see, for example, Robadue 1995), <strong>and</strong> shrimp farmingmay require more immediate action. Sector environmental assessment of coastal aquaculture, leadingto <strong>the</strong> development of a provisional sector plan, may be an effective first step toward morecomprehensive ICM.Whe<strong>the</strong>r central or local government bodies should initiate such policies is a question that variouscountries have been grappling with. There is an increasing consensus that <strong>the</strong> main initiative mustcome from local government, facilitated through an appropriate national policy <strong>and</strong> legal framework.Where such a framework is lacking, <strong>the</strong> development of local initiatives may stimulate <strong>and</strong> provide <strong>the</strong>basis for national policy <strong>and</strong> legislation.A detailed discussion <strong>and</strong> guidelines for <strong>the</strong> planning <strong>and</strong> environmental management of <strong>the</strong>aquaculture sector, <strong>and</strong> its integration within broader ICM frameworks, will be published shortly byGESAMP (1999). Comprehensive guidelines for both sector <strong>and</strong> project environmental assessment ofcoastal aquaculture have recently been developed by SEACAM (1999). More general reviews <strong>and</strong>guidance on <strong>the</strong> development of integrated coastal management plans may be found in many recentpublications. (Recent examples include Cicin-Sain, Knecht, & Fisk 1995; UNEP 1995;GEF/UNDP/IMO MPP-EAS & CMC 1996; Post & Lundin 1996; <strong>and</strong> Sorensen 1997).Economic <strong>and</strong> market incentives <strong>and</strong> disincentivesLegislation <strong>and</strong> planning measures for aquaculture development commonly have a significantregulatory component. However, <strong>the</strong> difficulties of applying regulatory approaches in many countriesshould not be underestimated, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is a need to consider alternatives. Economic incentives <strong>and</strong>disincentives offer a potentially simpler <strong>and</strong> cheaper approach to guiding or modifying developmentactivity with minimal intervention <strong>and</strong> conflict; incentive methods should generally be given moreconsideration (van Houtte 1996).Government incentivesEconomic incentives to modify location, design, <strong>and</strong> operation of shrimp farms rely upon <strong>the</strong> reality orperception that higher net profits will be made if <strong>the</strong> farmer behaves in certain ways.57
There is little published information about successful tax incentives <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r government-institutedincentives with <strong>the</strong> specific objective of fur<strong>the</strong>ring sustainable shrimp farming. However, a broad rangeof more general measures is now a key feature of, for example, <strong>the</strong> European Common AgriculturalPolicy, where a range of grants, cheap credit, <strong>and</strong> tax incentives are available to farmers in specialareas who farm in traditional ways or in a manner designed to enhance biodiversity or conserve rare orimportant natural habitat.Examples of tax incentives to promote <strong>the</strong> development of shrimp farming, <strong>and</strong> in particular to attractforeign investment in shrimp farming, do exist (Anon. 1988). However, <strong>the</strong>se incentives seem to havebeen directed more towards pushing rapid growth of <strong>the</strong> industry <strong>and</strong> of exports, ra<strong>the</strong>r thansafeguarding against negative impacts on <strong>the</strong> environment.Government can manipulate net profits in a variety of ways, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se may be linked to specificconditions or circumstances. Profit can be increased if farmers receive:• Grant aid;• Cheap credit;• Free or subsidized l<strong>and</strong> purchase or rental;• Free or subsidized inputs;• Tax exemptions or holidays;• Production <strong>and</strong> marketing infrastructure; <strong>and</strong>• Subsidized research, training, <strong>and</strong> extension services.These benefits could be linked to location (e.g., <strong>the</strong> incentives are only available in designated shrimpculture zones), or to design <strong>and</strong> technology (e.g., grant aid or tax exemption is available for wastetreatment equipment). However, any differential benefits or taxes should be used with great caution,especially if <strong>the</strong>y are likely to give new farmers an advantage over existing farmers.One option is to introduce tax incentives for particular applications <strong>and</strong> procedures in order to avoidnegative impacts on <strong>the</strong> environment. For example, tax incentives <strong>and</strong> exemption from import (oro<strong>the</strong>r) duties on equipment needed for proper water treatment may be introduced to ensure that suchtreatment is installed. In some countries, government investment grants are in use to encourageinvestment in environmentally friendly technology or designs.The establishment <strong>and</strong> operation of a government-financed veterinary service would improve shrimphealth conditions <strong>and</strong> help prevent <strong>the</strong> spread of disease. Government-supported training <strong>and</strong> extensionprograms on proper management practices can help alleviate or prevent both disease <strong>and</strong> environmentalproblems. Government support for research in sustainable aquaculture <strong>and</strong> environmental impactstudies would encourage operators to undertake such studies. Financial grants for undertakingappropriate environmental impact assessments would encourage investors to comply with <strong>the</strong>regulations. In such situations, such EIAs must be required to comply with certain specifications.Some examples of <strong>the</strong>se approaches already exist. Cheap credit is a common tool used in aquaculturedevelopment programs, but to date it has only rarely been linked to siting or design conditions. L<strong>and</strong>,infrastructure (research, training, water supply), credit, <strong>and</strong> free seed have been provided for somesmall shrimp farmers in several countries, <strong>and</strong> recently substantial seawater irrigation systems havebeen built in Thail<strong>and</strong>. To date, however, <strong>the</strong>se incentives have rarely been comprehensively linked toplans <strong>and</strong> strategies for sustainable aquaculture development.Market incentives<strong>Shrimp</strong> farming is an international business: trade, namely export, of a high-quality processed product.Processing is relatively centralized since processing <strong>and</strong> freezing must be done rapidly while <strong>the</strong>product is very fresh. This requirement has also led to a centralization of harvesting, done by specialistcontractors in major producing countries. Product inspection <strong>and</strong> certification is already in place, forexample, for antibiotic residues. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> product is high-value, purchased in bulk by largeretailing chains, <strong>and</strong> eaten by increasingly discriminating consumers. These conditions are ideal for <strong>the</strong>establishment of environmental quality labeling initiatives.58
- Page 7 and 8:
sensitivity analysis should include
- Page 9 and 10:
ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
- Page 11 and 12:
ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
- Page 13 and 14:
same time, development is necessary
- Page 15 and 16:
Current shrimp farming practice inc
- Page 17 and 18: Current status of the industryToday
- Page 19 and 20: In recent years, several major crop
- Page 21: CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
- Page 24 and 25: FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
- Page 26 and 27: FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SH
- Page 28 and 29: TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
- Page 30 and 31: Shrimp farming systems vary greatly
- Page 32 and 33: creeks, and sea-grass beds, fulfill
- Page 34 and 35: arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
- Page 36 and 37: capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
- Page 38 and 39: shrimp or high-value finfish produc
- Page 40 and 41: In more immediately practical terms
- Page 42 and 43: Disease prevention and managementDi
- Page 44 and 45: (Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
- Page 46 and 47: suitable for human consumption or f
- Page 48 and 49: • Supply and effluent canals shou
- Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
- Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
- Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
- Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
- Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
- Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
- Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
- Page 72 and 73: Conclusions and recommendationsReco
- Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
- Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASS
- Page 78 and 79: • Appraisal and supervision missi
- Page 80 and 81: The structure of the executive summ
- Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDAT
- Page 84 and 85: • Requirements and guidance for f
- Page 86 and 87: EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
- Page 88 and 89: ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
- Page 90 and 91: • Sensitivity calculations and an
- Page 92 and 93: Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
- Page 94 and 95: ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
- Page 96 and 97: ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
- Page 98 and 99: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 100 and 101: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 102 and 103: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 104 and 105: BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
- Page 106 and 107: Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
- Page 108 and 109: Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
- Page 110 and 111: Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
- Page 112: World Commission on Environment and