• Supply <strong>and</strong> effluent canals should be isolated as far as possible from each o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> fromo<strong>the</strong>r farms.In practice, <strong>the</strong> last of <strong>the</strong>se will be difficult to achieve in <strong>the</strong> absence of a broader planning framework,including water supply/disposal infrastructure.In all cases of new farm construction or existing farm rehabilitation, farms should be designed <strong>and</strong>engineered to allow o<strong>the</strong>r economic activities to surface should <strong>the</strong>re be shrimp crop failures, as hashappened over <strong>the</strong> last decade or more in all of <strong>the</strong> major shrimp-producing countries. This is aparticularly important issue in poor coastal communities, whose residents derive <strong>the</strong>ir livelihoods fromcoastal aquaculture. If an operation fails, a plan <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> infrastructure should exist for <strong>the</strong> culture ofo<strong>the</strong>r species, which often will usually have a much lower market price. If this is not possible, a“fallow” period may be planned to allow recovery of soil quality <strong>and</strong> decline of disease organisms, asis commonly practiced in agriculture. Thus, investment in <strong>the</strong> farm should be based on <strong>the</strong> assumptionthat culture of lower-value species, or a fallow period, would follow failed shrimp culture, <strong>and</strong> thateven with repayment of <strong>the</strong> amortized investment, <strong>the</strong> profitability of <strong>the</strong> farm would remainsufficiently high to justify continued operation. Sustainable seed supply <strong>and</strong> nutritional needs should beconsidered in <strong>the</strong> selection of alternate species so as to reduce <strong>the</strong>ir overall impacts.Technology <strong>and</strong> researchImproved technology should allow for significant reductions in <strong>the</strong> environmental impact of shrimpfarming. In particular:• Increased supply of seed from hatcheries <strong>and</strong> breeding of pond-reared shrimp should reduce<strong>the</strong> potential risk of depleting wild stocks <strong>and</strong> allow for greater control of disease;• Breeding may also produce disease-resistant strains;• Adoption of semiclosed, closed, <strong>and</strong> recycled systems should reduce environmental impacts—if well designed <strong>and</strong> managed;• New technologies for water treatment <strong>and</strong> management should improve pond water <strong>and</strong>effluent quality;• Lining of ponds or dikes may reduce seepage <strong>and</strong>, in some cases, saline contamination;• Techniques for identifying disease in broodstock <strong>and</strong> seed, <strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> early identification ofdisease in ponds, should reduce disease incidence <strong>and</strong> allow for more effective treatments;• Development <strong>and</strong> adoption of low-fishmeal diets should protect shrimp farmers from <strong>the</strong>likely rise in prices of fishmeal in <strong>the</strong> future, as well as reducing pressure from aquaculture on<strong>the</strong>se prices; <strong>and</strong>• Development of higher-quality, low-pollution diets will reduce feed-associated wastes in pondwater <strong>and</strong> thus improve effluent quality.Promoting <strong>the</strong>se developments in technology will require collaboration between government, shrimpfarmers, <strong>and</strong> feed manufacturers. Some changes in technology may be advanced through a set ofincentives <strong>and</strong> constraints, which might include regulation, taxation, grants, <strong>and</strong> marketing schemes.These are discussed fur<strong>the</strong>r in Chapter 6.ManagementPoor management is a major contributing factor to <strong>the</strong> environmental effects of shrimp farming.Relatively simple changes in management practices can lead to significant reductions in environmentalimpact:• Careful management of soil, in particular soil acidity, through appropriate treatment includingregular flushing, liming, or lining with laterite soils, may improve pond water quality <strong>and</strong>reduce shrimp stress <strong>and</strong> disease;• Treatment of influent water supply (for example with chlorine) to eliminate pathogens <strong>and</strong>carriers may reduce disease incidence <strong>and</strong> associated use of chemicals;• Skilled assessment of seed health prior to purchase should reduce disease risks;• Modest stocking rates—combined with knowledge, skills, <strong>and</strong> technology—should reduce <strong>the</strong>risk <strong>and</strong> severity of losses from disease;37
• Reductions in water exchange coupled with increased aeration <strong>and</strong> careful pond watermanagement can reduce <strong>the</strong> quantity of routine effluents, <strong>and</strong> may reduce <strong>the</strong> rate of diseasespread;• Intensive aeration may itself serve as a form of water treatment;• Careful management of water at <strong>the</strong> time of harvest, <strong>and</strong> effective use of settling ponds, cangreatly reduce nutrient <strong>and</strong> organic matter loadings on <strong>the</strong> environment;• Careful disposal of pond sediments (ra<strong>the</strong>r than simple flushing) to allow for oxidation <strong>and</strong>decomposition will greatly reduce <strong>the</strong> nutrient <strong>and</strong> organic matter loading to <strong>the</strong> environment;• Providing <strong>the</strong> right amount of high-quality food at <strong>the</strong> right time throughout <strong>the</strong> productioncycle can greatly reduce feed <strong>and</strong> metabolic wastes;• High-quality husb<strong>and</strong>ry, knowledge <strong>and</strong> skills in identifying <strong>and</strong> treating disease will greatlyreduce <strong>the</strong> incidence of disease <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> associated use of chemicals; <strong>and</strong>• Observance of an adequate withdrawal period when chemicals <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>rapeutants have to beused, to clear <strong>the</strong> shrimp of residues, will improve <strong>the</strong>ir marketability <strong>and</strong> raise <strong>the</strong>ir marketvalue.ImplementationThe implementation of <strong>the</strong>se varied approaches to reducing environmental impact <strong>and</strong> promotingsustainability will depend upon managers <strong>and</strong> staff having adequate skills <strong>and</strong> access to information,<strong>and</strong> in many cases some form of government—or market-initiated incentives or constraints.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, some of <strong>the</strong> mitigation measures (for example, restrictions on siting, provision ofinfrastructure, or development of disease prevention <strong>and</strong> management strategies) will require directgovernment intervention. The key roles for central <strong>and</strong> local government in facilitating, promoting, <strong>and</strong>in some cases directly implementing <strong>the</strong>se mitigation measures is discussed in Chapter 6.Fur<strong>the</strong>r discussion <strong>and</strong> detailed guidelines for measures to reduce <strong>the</strong> environmental impact of shrimpfarming can be found in several recent publications (Barg 1992; SEACAM 1999; Hambrey 1996c;Pillay 1997; Clay 1996; Global Aquaculture Alliance 1998; GESAMP 1999; Institute of Aquaculture1996).38
- Page 7 and 8: sensitivity analysis should include
- Page 9 and 10: ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
- Page 11 and 12: ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
- Page 13 and 14: same time, development is necessary
- Page 15 and 16: Current shrimp farming practice inc
- Page 17 and 18: Current status of the industryToday
- Page 19 and 20: In recent years, several major crop
- Page 21: CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
- Page 24 and 25: FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
- Page 26 and 27: FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SH
- Page 28 and 29: TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
- Page 30 and 31: Shrimp farming systems vary greatly
- Page 32 and 33: creeks, and sea-grass beds, fulfill
- Page 34 and 35: arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
- Page 36 and 37: capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
- Page 38 and 39: shrimp or high-value finfish produc
- Page 40 and 41: In more immediately practical terms
- Page 42 and 43: Disease prevention and managementDi
- Page 44 and 45: (Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
- Page 46 and 47: suitable for human consumption or f
- Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
- Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
- Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
- Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
- Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
- Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
- Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- Page 68 and 69: Planning and resource managementIna
- Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
- Page 72 and 73: Conclusions and recommendationsReco
- Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
- Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASS
- Page 78 and 79: • Appraisal and supervision missi
- Page 80 and 81: The structure of the executive summ
- Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDAT
- Page 84 and 85: • Requirements and guidance for f
- Page 86 and 87: EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
- Page 88 and 89: ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
- Page 90 and 91: • Sensitivity calculations and an
- Page 92 and 93: Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
- Page 94 and 95: ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
- Page 96 and 97: ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
- Page 98 and 99:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 100 and 101:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 102 and 103:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 104 and 105:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
- Page 106 and 107:
Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
- Page 108 and 109:
Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
- Page 110 and 111:
Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
- Page 112:
World Commission on Environment and