12.07.2015 Views

Shrimp Farming and the Environment - Library

Shrimp Farming and the Environment - Library

Shrimp Farming and the Environment - Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Planning <strong>and</strong> resource managementInadequacy of existing proceduresThere are few examples of well-planned shrimp farming to draw on. Although many countries haveplanning systems that have been applied to aquaculture, <strong>the</strong>y have usually been unable to applyprocedures thoroughly <strong>and</strong> consistently while facing <strong>the</strong> sheer pressure for rapid development thatsprings from <strong>the</strong> initial success of aquaculture. Sri Lanka, for example, has relatively well developedlegislation <strong>and</strong> planning procedures applicable to aquaculture development, including coastal planning<strong>and</strong> environmental assessment procedures, but unregulated development has none<strong>the</strong>less taken place,<strong>and</strong> major shrimp disease problems have occurred. One of <strong>the</strong> main problems (in Sri Lanka <strong>and</strong> manyo<strong>the</strong>r shrimp farming countries) has been <strong>the</strong> inadequacy of environmental assessment procedures.These have been undermined through illegal developments on <strong>the</strong> one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> inadequacy ofconventional EIA to cope with large numbers of small- or medium-scale developments on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r.When taken in isolation, such a development is unlikely to have a significant impact on <strong>the</strong>environment, but a large number of such projects (typical in estuarine <strong>and</strong> lagoon systems suitable forshrimp culture) is likely to have a significant cumulative impact.Planning frameworksSector-level environmental assessment (as opposed to project- or individual farm-level) linked to asector plan <strong>and</strong> a set of appropriate incentives <strong>and</strong> constraints appears to be <strong>the</strong> only way to address <strong>the</strong>problems associated with <strong>the</strong>se cumulative impacts (SEACAM 1999; GESAMP 1999). However, if <strong>the</strong>planning <strong>and</strong> regulatory framework is to address social, economic, <strong>and</strong> environmental issues in acomprehensive manner, it will need to include all elements of integrated coastal management (ICM).ICM has been widely promoted as a suitable framework for addressing <strong>the</strong> problems <strong>and</strong> issuespresented in previous chapters (Chua 1992; Chua 1997; Olsen & Coello 1995; Barg 1992; Holl<strong>and</strong>1998) <strong>and</strong> should be pursued as a long-term ideal. Unfortunately, developing comprehensive ICMplans is typically a difficult <strong>and</strong> lengthy process (see, for example, Robadue 1995), <strong>and</strong> shrimp farmingmay require more immediate action. Sector environmental assessment of coastal aquaculture, leadingto <strong>the</strong> development of a provisional sector plan, may be an effective first step toward morecomprehensive ICM.Whe<strong>the</strong>r central or local government bodies should initiate such policies is a question that variouscountries have been grappling with. There is an increasing consensus that <strong>the</strong> main initiative mustcome from local government, facilitated through an appropriate national policy <strong>and</strong> legal framework.Where such a framework is lacking, <strong>the</strong> development of local initiatives may stimulate <strong>and</strong> provide <strong>the</strong>basis for national policy <strong>and</strong> legislation.A detailed discussion <strong>and</strong> guidelines for <strong>the</strong> planning <strong>and</strong> environmental management of <strong>the</strong>aquaculture sector, <strong>and</strong> its integration within broader ICM frameworks, will be published shortly byGESAMP (1999). Comprehensive guidelines for both sector <strong>and</strong> project environmental assessment ofcoastal aquaculture have recently been developed by SEACAM (1999). More general reviews <strong>and</strong>guidance on <strong>the</strong> development of integrated coastal management plans may be found in many recentpublications. (Recent examples include Cicin-Sain, Knecht, & Fisk 1995; UNEP 1995;GEF/UNDP/IMO MPP-EAS & CMC 1996; Post & Lundin 1996; <strong>and</strong> Sorensen 1997).Economic <strong>and</strong> market incentives <strong>and</strong> disincentivesLegislation <strong>and</strong> planning measures for aquaculture development commonly have a significantregulatory component. However, <strong>the</strong> difficulties of applying regulatory approaches in many countriesshould not be underestimated, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is a need to consider alternatives. Economic incentives <strong>and</strong>disincentives offer a potentially simpler <strong>and</strong> cheaper approach to guiding or modifying developmentactivity with minimal intervention <strong>and</strong> conflict; incentive methods should generally be given moreconsideration (van Houtte 1996).Government incentivesEconomic incentives to modify location, design, <strong>and</strong> operation of shrimp farms rely upon <strong>the</strong> reality orperception that higher net profits will be made if <strong>the</strong> farmer behaves in certain ways.57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!