In more immediately practical terms, <strong>the</strong> safe <strong>and</strong> effective use of chemicals in aquaculture has recentlybeen reviewed by GESAMP (1997) <strong>and</strong> is also presented in relation to specific diseases by AAHRI(Chanratchakool, Turnbull, et al. 1996).DiseaseSome of <strong>the</strong> diseases that trouble <strong>the</strong> shrimp farming industry are directly caused by environmentalproblems, while a number of o<strong>the</strong>r diseases are triggered or spread more effectively by <strong>the</strong> stressinduced by environmental problems. None of <strong>the</strong> shrimp diseases are known to be pathogenic tohumans. In recent years, shrimp farming has been afflicted with outbreaks of viral diseases that havegreatly undermined profitability <strong>and</strong> sustainability of operations. Based on a detailed survey conductedin 1993–94, <strong>the</strong> Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia estimated <strong>the</strong> total losses in 12 countries inSouth <strong>and</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Asia to amount to U.S.$143 billion dollars (ADB/NACA 1995).Disease outbreaks have led to <strong>the</strong> collapse of shrimp farming in some places, including Taiwan,Republic of China; parts of Thail<strong>and</strong>; <strong>the</strong> east coast of India; <strong>and</strong> China. In China, <strong>the</strong> collapse has ledto a shift away from shrimp to o<strong>the</strong>r species such as finfish, mollusks, <strong>and</strong> crab, some of which aregrown in polyculture.Viral diseasesMore than 15 different viruses have been identified for Penaeid shrimp over <strong>the</strong> past 20 years. Many of<strong>the</strong> known viruses infect larvae <strong>and</strong> juveniles, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y can be species-specific. <strong>Shrimp</strong> may becomeless resistant under conditions of stress, such as overcrowding, water temperature fluctuation, lowoxygen levels, or high levels of pollutants (Lundin 1996).Taura SyndromeIn <strong>the</strong> Western Hemisphere, <strong>the</strong> most damaging disease at present is Taura Syndrome Virus, referred toas TSV or just TS (Rosenberry 1996). Attacking shortly after shrimp are stocked, it kills from 40 to90% of <strong>the</strong> juveniles in a pond. It is called “Taura Syndrome” because it first appeared on <strong>the</strong> TauraRiver, about 25 km sou<strong>the</strong>ast of Guayaquil, Ecuador. It has also been called “Little Red Tail” (LaColita Roja) because <strong>the</strong> fan tail <strong>and</strong> body of affected shrimp turn pale pink.Although TSV may have been active for a number of years earlier, it was first noticed in shrimp farmsin Ecuador in 1992. Several farms were affected by it, <strong>the</strong>n it disappeared quickly but reappeared inMarch 1993. At that time, it became a major epidemic, killing farm-raised shrimp throughout <strong>the</strong> Gulfof Guayaquil.Taura spread from Ecuador to Colombia as early as 1993. In 1994, most farms in Honduras <strong>and</strong>Guatemala were affected as well, <strong>and</strong> by 1995 <strong>the</strong>re were reports of <strong>the</strong> disease in Mexico. In May1995, TSV hit Texas shrimp farms <strong>and</strong> killed 90% of <strong>the</strong> crop.In 1993, 1994, <strong>and</strong> 1995, Ecuadorian shrimp farmers continued to produce large amounts of shrimp,although many areas were infected with TSV. Profits were lower, because <strong>the</strong> farmers stocked <strong>the</strong>ponds with twice <strong>the</strong> ordinary number of juveniles.There is now evidence that <strong>the</strong> white-leg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) has become resistant to TSV. Inmid-June 1995, survival of wild-caught seed ranged from 50 to 60%, while survival of hatcheryproducedseed was 20 to 30%. This was still double <strong>the</strong> survival rates experienced in 1993–94.There have been no reports of Taura in Costa Rica, Panama, Venezuela, or Nicaragua.White Spot Virus DiseaseIn <strong>the</strong> Eastern Hemisphere, White Spot Virus Disease is <strong>the</strong> most common <strong>and</strong> serious shrimp diseaseaffecting shrimp farms (Rosenberry 1996). In Thail<strong>and</strong>, attempts to eradicate <strong>the</strong> disease have so farfailed. White spot was also probably responsible for <strong>the</strong> major shrimp farming disasters in Taiwan,Republic of China, in 1987–88 <strong>and</strong> in China in 1993. It has caused problems in Bangladesh, India, <strong>and</strong>Vietnam, <strong>and</strong> is probably established everywhere in Sou<strong>the</strong>ast Asia.29
The virus causing <strong>the</strong> white spot disease has been given different names by various research groups.Among <strong>the</strong>se names are Penaeus monodon Occluded Baculovirus 2 or 3 (PmNOBII <strong>and</strong> PmNOBIII),<strong>and</strong> Systemic Ectodermal <strong>and</strong> Mesodermal baculovirus (SEMBV). Lately, <strong>the</strong> virus is referred to asei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> White Spot Virus (WSV) or White Spot Baculovirus (WSBV).Post-larvae from 20 days of age <strong>and</strong> up are susceptible to White Spot Disease. Mass mortalities of up to100% occur within 3 to 5 days of <strong>the</strong> first clinical signs. Outbreaks are now more sporadic than <strong>the</strong>widespread epidemics that hit <strong>the</strong> industry in 1993, but <strong>the</strong>y are more common in areas with denseconcentrations of shrimp farms. <strong>Environment</strong>al factors like poor water quality <strong>and</strong> deteriorating pondbottoms have been implicated as <strong>the</strong> stresses that trigger outbreaks. Thus far, White Spot Disease hasaffected Penaeus chinensis <strong>and</strong> P. monodon most significantly, but recently has devastated shrimp inponds on <strong>the</strong> Pacific coast of Central <strong>and</strong> South America.Among <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r important viral diseases is Yellow Head Virus (YHV), which has been a problemparticularly in Asia (for a detailed discussion of viral diseases in shrimp farming, see Flegel 1997 <strong>and</strong>Flegel, Boonyaratpalin, & Withyachumnarnkul 1997).Bacterial diseasesMany different forms of bacteria can affect shrimp, frequently as opportunistic follow-ups to viralinfection or environmental stress (Lundin 1996). The short-term strategy for dealing with bacteria hasbeen to use antibiotics as well as improving pond cleaning <strong>and</strong> increasing water exchange.Vibrio species, in particular V. harveyii (luminescent bacteria), have posed significant problems inmany Asian countries, including <strong>the</strong> Philippines, Indonesia, <strong>and</strong> Sri Lanka, affecting hatcheries <strong>and</strong>grow-out ponds.O<strong>the</strong>r diseasesO<strong>the</strong>r diseases affecting shrimp include rickettsia, such as <strong>the</strong> Texas necrotizing hepatopancreatitis(TNHP) in Penaeus vannamei, <strong>and</strong> rickettsia-like infection of P<strong>and</strong>alus. Fungi also occasionally infectshrimp. Protozoa can cause considerable damage to shrimp as well, particularly under poor farmingconditions.Disease <strong>and</strong> environmental problemsOutbreaks <strong>and</strong> spread of shrimp diseases cause serious environmental problems, including:• Increased risk of infections in wild populations of shrimp <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r crustaceans;• Widespread use of antibiotics <strong>and</strong> chemicals that can harm wild populations <strong>and</strong> humanhealth;• Large amounts of dead shrimp; <strong>and</strong>• Large areas ab<strong>and</strong>oned by shrimp farmers.The use of antibiotics <strong>and</strong> chemicals is discussed above, <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> ab<strong>and</strong>oned by shrimp farmers isdiscussed fur<strong>the</strong>r below.The diseases caused by specific agents like viruses, bacteria, <strong>and</strong> fungi originate in wild shrimp <strong>and</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r crustacean populations. Although <strong>the</strong> frequency <strong>and</strong> impact of diseases in wild populations ispoorly understood, concentrated outbreaks of an infectious disease in shrimp farms are likely toincrease <strong>the</strong> risk of infecting wild stocks locally, as well as far<strong>the</strong>r away from <strong>the</strong> farms. This couldcause increased mortality in wild stocks, resulting in alterations to <strong>the</strong> ecosystem <strong>and</strong> reducedproduction of shrimp biomass.Post-larvae <strong>and</strong> broodstock are often transported within countries <strong>and</strong> exported to o<strong>the</strong>r shrimp farmingcountries. These are practices that can increase <strong>the</strong> spread of disease. If dead shrimp are not removedquickly from shrimp ponds <strong>and</strong> properly disposed of, <strong>the</strong>ir presence increases <strong>the</strong> spread of disease in<strong>the</strong> pond.30
- Page 7 and 8: sensitivity analysis should include
- Page 9 and 10: ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
- Page 11 and 12: ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
- Page 13 and 14: same time, development is necessary
- Page 15 and 16: Current shrimp farming practice inc
- Page 17 and 18: Current status of the industryToday
- Page 19 and 20: In recent years, several major crop
- Page 21: CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
- Page 24 and 25: FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
- Page 26 and 27: FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SH
- Page 28 and 29: TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
- Page 30 and 31: Shrimp farming systems vary greatly
- Page 32 and 33: creeks, and sea-grass beds, fulfill
- Page 34 and 35: arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
- Page 36 and 37: capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
- Page 38 and 39: shrimp or high-value finfish produc
- Page 42 and 43: Disease prevention and managementDi
- Page 44 and 45: (Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
- Page 46 and 47: suitable for human consumption or f
- Page 48 and 49: • Supply and effluent canals shou
- Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
- Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
- Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
- Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
- Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
- Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
- Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- Page 68 and 69: Planning and resource managementIna
- Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
- Page 72 and 73: Conclusions and recommendationsReco
- Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
- Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASS
- Page 78 and 79: • Appraisal and supervision missi
- Page 80 and 81: The structure of the executive summ
- Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDAT
- Page 84 and 85: • Requirements and guidance for f
- Page 86 and 87: EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
- Page 88 and 89: ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
- Page 90 and 91:
• Sensitivity calculations and an
- Page 92 and 93:
Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
- Page 94 and 95:
ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
- Page 96 and 97:
ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
- Page 98 and 99:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 100 and 101:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 102 and 103:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 104 and 105:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
- Page 106 and 107:
Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
- Page 108 and 109:
Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
- Page 110 and 111:
Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
- Page 112:
World Commission on Environment and