<strong>Shrimp</strong> farming systems vary greatly according to <strong>the</strong> intensity with which <strong>the</strong>y utilize resources (suchas l<strong>and</strong>, capital, labor, fuel, water, feed, <strong>and</strong> fertilizer). The economic desirability of different systems<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir environmental impact depends to a large degree on <strong>the</strong> local scarcity or abundance of suchresources, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> way in which <strong>the</strong>y are managed under <strong>the</strong> farm operation. O<strong>the</strong>r specificcircumstances such as site conditions <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> socioeconomic status of <strong>the</strong> operator will determine <strong>the</strong>relative desirability of different systems.High technology may produce high yields (measured in both production volumes <strong>and</strong> profitability), but<strong>the</strong>y require close monitoring <strong>and</strong> a great degree of knowledge on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> farmer. Whileintensive <strong>and</strong> superintensive shrimp farming technologies may be beneficial both by using little l<strong>and</strong><strong>and</strong> producing high output, <strong>the</strong>se technologies are in general more difficult to manage, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> risks arehigh. The collapse of intensive shrimp farming in Taiwan, Republic of China, is a case in point.19
CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF SHRIMPAQUACULTUREFor centuries, <strong>the</strong> coastline has been <strong>the</strong> most important human habitat, <strong>and</strong>, as a result, has beensubject to a wide range of development pressures. <strong>Shrimp</strong> farming represents additional pressure on<strong>the</strong>se areas, at least potentially. While shrimp farming per se does not necessarily have a significantadverse impact on <strong>the</strong> coastal environment, inappropriate practices <strong>and</strong> unplanned development haveled to a number of problems.The main environmental impacts associated with shrimp aquaculture, <strong>and</strong> ways in which specificimpacts can be reduced or mitigated, are discussed below. The means by which <strong>the</strong>se mitigatingmeasures can be facilitated, promoted, or enforced at <strong>the</strong> farm level are discussed fur<strong>the</strong>r in Chapter 7,but <strong>the</strong>se vary greatly according to <strong>the</strong> particular kind of shrimp farming, <strong>the</strong> socioeconomic status of<strong>the</strong> farmers, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r local circumstances. More detailed guidance will be developed in Phase II of thisstudy.The actual or potential environmental impacts of shrimp farming fall into <strong>the</strong> following categories:• Destruction of natural habitat (through direct conversion);• Abstraction/contamination <strong>and</strong> salinization of groundwater;• Organic matter <strong>and</strong> nutrient pollution;• Chemicals;• Disease;• Harvest of broodstock <strong>and</strong> wild post-larvae (PL);• Introduction of exotic species;• Ab<strong>and</strong>onment; <strong>and</strong>• Use of fishmeal in feeds.The emphasis of this report is on ways to make shrimp farming more sustainable. As a result, <strong>the</strong>emphasis of this chapter is on mitigation measures to address negative impacts. In some instances, suchmeasures have already been adopted widely by <strong>the</strong> industry; in o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong> suggestions are based moreon <strong>the</strong>ory than on practical application. In ei<strong>the</strong>r case, more research needs to be undertaken todocument <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> proposed mitigation measures in addressing <strong>the</strong> impacts.From <strong>the</strong> outset, however, it should be emphasized that many of <strong>the</strong> impacts from shrimp aquacultureare not unique to that industry. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>y are typical of agricultural practices in general, especiallywhere l<strong>and</strong> is in short supply. It should also be noted that shrimp farms suffer a great deal frompollution caused by o<strong>the</strong>r activities, including agriculture <strong>and</strong> industry. Indeed, while many o<strong>the</strong>ractivities are relatively careless of <strong>the</strong>ir environment, experienced shrimp farmers realize that long-termbenefits result from maintaining environmental quality. When establishing new farms, water quality isone of <strong>the</strong> most important factors to consider; sites where industry, agriculture, or o<strong>the</strong>r activities arepolluting <strong>the</strong> water should be avoided.Destruction of natural habitatExtensive shrimp farming takes place in <strong>the</strong> intertidal zone, commonly in or adjacent to estuarinesystems. Semi-intensive <strong>and</strong> intensive shrimp farming usually takes place in <strong>the</strong> upper intertidal or justbehind/above <strong>the</strong> intertidal zone, often in adjacent wetl<strong>and</strong>s. Some shrimp farming now takes place ininl<strong>and</strong> areas. Most tropical estuarine systems are dominated by mangrove, an intertidal ecosystem oftree <strong>and</strong> shrub species specially adapted to saline habitats, that support a wide range of o<strong>the</strong>rorganisms.In <strong>the</strong> early part of <strong>the</strong> 20th century, many estuarine systems <strong>and</strong> wetl<strong>and</strong>s remained relatively freefrom development because of <strong>the</strong>ir unsuitability for agriculture <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> costs of clearance <strong>and</strong> drainagefor urban development. In <strong>the</strong> 1960s, ’70s, <strong>and</strong> ’80s, <strong>the</strong>y were regarded as wastel<strong>and</strong> by many, <strong>and</strong>governments <strong>and</strong> international agencies actively encouraged private sector development foraquaculture <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r enterprises. It is only relatively recently that <strong>the</strong>ir biodiversity <strong>and</strong> ecologicalvalue has been widely recognized. It should be emphasized that while <strong>the</strong> most attention has been paidto mangrove in recent years, estuarine systems in general, including salt flats, mud flats, lagoons,20
- Page 7 and 8: sensitivity analysis should include
- Page 9 and 10: ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
- Page 11 and 12: ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
- Page 13 and 14: same time, development is necessary
- Page 15 and 16: Current shrimp farming practice inc
- Page 17 and 18: Current status of the industryToday
- Page 19 and 20: In recent years, several major crop
- Page 21: CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
- Page 24 and 25: FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
- Page 26 and 27: FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SH
- Page 28 and 29: TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
- Page 32 and 33: creeks, and sea-grass beds, fulfill
- Page 34 and 35: arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
- Page 36 and 37: capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
- Page 38 and 39: shrimp or high-value finfish produc
- Page 40 and 41: In more immediately practical terms
- Page 42 and 43: Disease prevention and managementDi
- Page 44 and 45: (Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
- Page 46 and 47: suitable for human consumption or f
- Page 48 and 49: • Supply and effluent canals shou
- Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
- Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
- Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
- Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
- Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
- Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
- Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- Page 68 and 69: Planning and resource managementIna
- Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
- Page 72 and 73: Conclusions and recommendationsReco
- Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
- Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASS
- Page 78 and 79: • Appraisal and supervision missi
- Page 80 and 81:
The structure of the executive summ
- Page 82 and 83:
CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDAT
- Page 84 and 85:
• Requirements and guidance for f
- Page 86 and 87:
EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
- Page 88 and 89:
ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
- Page 90 and 91:
• Sensitivity calculations and an
- Page 92 and 93:
Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
- Page 94 and 95:
ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
- Page 96 and 97:
ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
- Page 98 and 99:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 100 and 101:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 102 and 103:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 104 and 105:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
- Page 106 and 107:
Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
- Page 108 and 109:
Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
- Page 110 and 111:
Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
- Page 112:
World Commission on Environment and