Conclusions <strong>and</strong> recommendationsRecommendations for government- <strong>and</strong> industry-initiated measures to promote <strong>and</strong> manage sustainableshrimp culture have been made in several recent reports <strong>and</strong> papers (Barg 1992; GESAMP 1996b,1997; Chua 1992, 1997; Clay 1996; SEACAM 1999). The main common features of <strong>the</strong>serecommendations are listed below, modified <strong>and</strong> supplemented on <strong>the</strong> basis of this analysis. Whilesome elements may be inappropriate in particular development contexts, governments <strong>and</strong> industryrepresentative bodies should consider all of <strong>the</strong>se issues carefully <strong>and</strong> seek to adopt <strong>and</strong> promote abroad range of measures, with <strong>the</strong> goal of implementing more sustainable shrimp culture, <strong>and</strong> inparticular <strong>the</strong> technical recommendations made in previous chapters.Central government policyIt is now generally recognized that in order to ensure that shrimp aquaculture is sustainable <strong>and</strong> willincreasingly contribute to food security, government policies have to be established <strong>and</strong> implementedthat are responsive to <strong>the</strong> main issues of sustainable development.In general, it is advisable to plan <strong>the</strong> development of shrimp farming as part of an integrated coastalmanagement plan, taking into consideration <strong>the</strong> many different uses of <strong>the</strong> coastal area. Where this isnot possible (from lack of time or resources), a sector (coastal aquaculture) environmental assessment,leading to a sector development <strong>and</strong> management plan, may be adequate.In general, sustainable development of shrimp aquaculture is most likely where <strong>the</strong> following preconditionscan be met:• A legal, regulatory, <strong>and</strong> enforcement framework specifically designed or adapted for coastalaquaculture development;• The existence of, <strong>and</strong> compliance with, an aquaculture development <strong>and</strong> management plan, oran integrated coastal management plan for <strong>the</strong> area;• Sector environmental assessment as a key element in <strong>the</strong> drawing up of such a plan;• In <strong>the</strong> case of large projects, environmental assessment studies, adhering to current bestpractices, undertaken during <strong>the</strong> project planning; <strong>and</strong>• Proper law enforcement instruments, supported by <strong>the</strong> resources necessary for enforcement.An appropriate framework <strong>and</strong> process for establishing <strong>the</strong>se conditions is summarized below,including an indication of appropriate roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities in this process.Legal <strong>and</strong> regulatory frameworksLegal <strong>and</strong> regulatory frameworks must be country-specific <strong>and</strong> will often build on or add to existinglegislation. None<strong>the</strong>less, some common components that serve to promote sustainable shrimp cultureshould be included:• Principles, values, <strong>and</strong> definitions relating to sustainable coastal aquaculture development;• Provisions for <strong>the</strong> development, implementation, monitoring, <strong>and</strong> adaptation of sector plans,natural resources management plans, <strong>and</strong>/or integrated coastal management plans at provincial<strong>and</strong>/or district levels;• Provisions for <strong>the</strong> application <strong>and</strong> use of both sector environmental assessment (EA) <strong>and</strong>project or individual farm environmental assessment;• Responsibilities <strong>and</strong> procedures for <strong>the</strong> development <strong>and</strong> implementation of such plans, <strong>and</strong>for <strong>the</strong> conduct of EA, including in particular <strong>the</strong> need to use a participatory approach;• Requirements for <strong>the</strong> minimum content of such plans, possibly based on <strong>the</strong> content outlinedbelow;• Requirements for setting environmental quality st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>and</strong> provisions for <strong>the</strong> promotion orregulation of activities in order to meet such quality st<strong>and</strong>ards;• Allocation of authority <strong>and</strong> responsibility for implementation <strong>and</strong> enforcement of plans <strong>and</strong>associated incentives <strong>and</strong> regulations;• Clarification of ownership <strong>and</strong> use rights of coastal l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> water (including provision foraccess <strong>and</strong> title to coastal <strong>and</strong> aquatic resources), taking full account of <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>and</strong>61
traditional rights of local users, <strong>and</strong> avoiding where possible one-time cash compensationsettlements;• Assignment of legal liabilities for environmental damage; <strong>and</strong>• Provisions for regular environmental monitoring <strong>and</strong> reporting.Sector EA <strong>and</strong> coastal aquaculture development <strong>and</strong> management plansWhe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are st<strong>and</strong>-alone or part of a wider ICM initiative, sector plans for coastal aquaculturedevelopment <strong>and</strong> management are likely to be a prerequisite for sustainable shrimp farming. Theyshould be based on thorough sector or regional environmental assessment. The following issues mightbe addressed in a thorough sector assessment <strong>and</strong> plan:• Identification of suitable areas for shrimp culture development, taking into account <strong>the</strong> needsof o<strong>the</strong>r resource users, <strong>the</strong> need for biodiversity conservation, <strong>the</strong> technology likely to beused, <strong>and</strong> environmental capacity;• Procedures for resolving any resource use conflicts that may arise (for example, betweenaquaculturists <strong>and</strong> fishermen or rice farmers);• Incentives <strong>and</strong> constraints to promote development in suitable areas in line with <strong>the</strong> carryingcapacity. This might include, for example, zoning schemes with associated infrastructure (e.g.,water supply <strong>and</strong> disposal, processing <strong>and</strong> marketing facilities or services), exclusion zones,registration/licensing requirements <strong>and</strong> associated economic or regulatory incentives <strong>and</strong>constraints, limits on production or new entrants;• Criteria for <strong>the</strong> application of project or farm EA, <strong>and</strong> environmental st<strong>and</strong>ards against whichimpacts can be assessed. Ideally, <strong>the</strong>se st<strong>and</strong>ards should be developed as part of sector EA <strong>and</strong>be based specifically on local ecological <strong>and</strong> hydrological conditions in shrimp-farming areas;• A water supply <strong>and</strong> management strategy, incorporating provision for appropriateinfrastructure (e.g., seawater irrigation <strong>and</strong> pre-treatment systems, wastewater treatment);• Effluent st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong>/or protocols for wastewater management; incentives <strong>and</strong>/or constraintsfor complying with st<strong>and</strong>ards or procedures;• A code of practice for siting, design, technology use, <strong>and</strong> management of individual farms oroperations, <strong>and</strong> a set of incentives <strong>and</strong> constraints (economic, market, or regulatory) to ensurecompliance with such codes;• A training, extension, <strong>and</strong> information dissemination strategy to fur<strong>the</strong>r promote soundpractices;• A disease prevention <strong>and</strong> management strategy (see Chapter 3) incorporating provisions formonitoring, diagnosis, <strong>and</strong> epidemiological analysis; disease testing <strong>and</strong> certification,especially for any seed or stock moved in or out of <strong>the</strong> planning zone; training <strong>and</strong> extensionon health management in shrimp ponds; incentives for diversification (alternate/mixedcropping, polyculture); <strong>and</strong> codes of practice for <strong>the</strong> use of chemicals in disease prevention<strong>and</strong> management;• Provision for farmer representation <strong>and</strong> participation in <strong>the</strong> planning process, whe<strong>the</strong>r this belimited to sector-level or comprehensive ICM;• Methods of ensuring that <strong>the</strong> benefits from aquaculture development are shared as widely aspossible. This might include, for example, provision of credit <strong>and</strong> training, <strong>and</strong> allocation ofsuitable sites to poorer groups or individuals;• A research program to explore issues such as environmental capacity, environmental impactsof specific aquaculture developments, seed supply, environmentally friendly feeds, improveddesign <strong>and</strong> technology; <strong>and</strong>• A monitoring <strong>and</strong> evaluation process to assess <strong>the</strong> success <strong>and</strong> problems of <strong>the</strong> developmentwith provision for plan modification as appropriate.A detailed discussion <strong>and</strong> guidelines for <strong>the</strong> development of coastal aquaculture management plans wasproduced by GESAMP (1999). In addition, guidelines for sector <strong>and</strong> project EA of coastal aquacultureare provided in SEACAM (1999). Reviews <strong>and</strong> guidance on <strong>the</strong> development of integrated coastalmanagement plans may be found in <strong>the</strong>se two publications, as well.Roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities for implementing <strong>the</strong> recommendationsIt is clear from Chapters 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 that shrimp farm development, left to itself, is unlikely to beundertaken sustainably. It is also clear from previous chapters that <strong>the</strong> measures <strong>and</strong> conditions62
- Page 7 and 8:
sensitivity analysis should include
- Page 9 and 10:
ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
- Page 11 and 12:
ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
- Page 13 and 14:
same time, development is necessary
- Page 15 and 16:
Current shrimp farming practice inc
- Page 17 and 18:
Current status of the industryToday
- Page 19 and 20:
In recent years, several major crop
- Page 21: CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
- Page 24 and 25: FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
- Page 26 and 27: FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SH
- Page 28 and 29: TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
- Page 30 and 31: Shrimp farming systems vary greatly
- Page 32 and 33: creeks, and sea-grass beds, fulfill
- Page 34 and 35: arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
- Page 36 and 37: capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
- Page 38 and 39: shrimp or high-value finfish produc
- Page 40 and 41: In more immediately practical terms
- Page 42 and 43: Disease prevention and managementDi
- Page 44 and 45: (Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
- Page 46 and 47: suitable for human consumption or f
- Page 48 and 49: • Supply and effluent canals shou
- Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
- Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
- Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
- Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
- Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
- Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
- Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- Page 68 and 69: Planning and resource managementIna
- Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
- Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
- Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASS
- Page 78 and 79: • Appraisal and supervision missi
- Page 80 and 81: The structure of the executive summ
- Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDAT
- Page 84 and 85: • Requirements and guidance for f
- Page 86 and 87: EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
- Page 88 and 89: ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
- Page 90 and 91: • Sensitivity calculations and an
- Page 92 and 93: Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
- Page 94 and 95: ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
- Page 96 and 97: ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
- Page 98 and 99: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 100 and 101: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 102 and 103: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 104 and 105: BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
- Page 106 and 107: Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
- Page 108 and 109: Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
- Page 110 and 111: Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
- Page 112: World Commission on Environment and