12.07.2015 Views

Shrimp Farming and the Environment - Library

Shrimp Farming and the Environment - Library

Shrimp Farming and the Environment - Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong> cropping cycle. In recent years shrimp farming has become a significant industry in predominantlyfreshwater rice-growing areas in Thail<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> has resulted in some social conflict which has recentlyled to a ban on shrimp farming in some areas (Flaherty & V<strong>and</strong>ergeest 1998).Seepage through pond bottoms, discharge of pond water into freshwater areas, <strong>and</strong> seepage of salt fromsediment disposal sites can salinize freshwater reservoirs (Boyd 1997), canals, <strong>and</strong> adjacent ricepaddies (Funge-Smith & Stewart 1996). The severity <strong>and</strong> significance of salt’s impact is littleresearched <strong>and</strong> is highly variable, depending on local hydrology <strong>and</strong> salinity regimes, as well as pondsoils <strong>and</strong> management practices. Clearly, this topic warrants fur<strong>the</strong>r research, but generalizationsshould be avoided. In some slightly brackish <strong>and</strong> even freshwater areas, shrimp farming may represent<strong>the</strong> best long-term economic option, but potential social, environmental, <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>-capability impactsmust be thoroughly researched <strong>and</strong> assessed, <strong>and</strong> adequately planned for, if implementation is to besustainable.Mitigation of water contaminationBoyd (1997) claims that if ponds are built on sites with soils of adequate clay content, seepage will notbe a factor, <strong>and</strong> he suggests that <strong>the</strong> practice of discharging pond water into freshwater bodies shouldbe prohibited.Research on <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> local aquifer, hydrology, <strong>and</strong> soils, along with knowledge of watermanagement practices, is required if this issue is to be adequately addressed. In addition, <strong>the</strong> relativebenefits <strong>and</strong> costs to <strong>the</strong> various stakeholders resulting from <strong>the</strong> introduction of shrimp farming needsto be assessed. Results from such research might <strong>the</strong>n contribute to a l<strong>and</strong>-use planning or zoningscheme to minimize conflict between users as well as long-term impact on <strong>the</strong> environment, <strong>and</strong> tomaximize social benefits.In effect, a precondition for mitigation of this kind of impact is effective research capacity linked to anatural resource planning system. In <strong>the</strong> absence of such a system, a precautionary approach should betaken. <strong>Shrimp</strong> farming should not be allowed to operate in ways or in locations where it may disrupt<strong>the</strong> aquifer <strong>and</strong> salinity regime.Organic matter <strong>and</strong> nutrient pollutionThe water in shrimp ponds is high in nutrients <strong>and</strong> organic matter, especially towards <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong>production cycle. These nutrients are derived mainly from waste food <strong>and</strong> metabolic products, as wellas from <strong>the</strong> small quantities of fertilizer added at <strong>the</strong> start of <strong>the</strong> cycle to stimulate plankton blooms(Institute of Aquaculture 1996). Poor feeding practices, particularly over-use of feed, allows feed tosink to <strong>the</strong> bottom of <strong>the</strong> pond. This pollutes <strong>the</strong> pond <strong>and</strong> significantly increases <strong>the</strong> cost of operation,since feed comprises approximately 40 to 60% of operational costs (Lin 1995). A survey in Thail<strong>and</strong>showed that larger operations achieved higher feed conversion ratios than smaller operations, onaverage, suggesting greater commitment <strong>and</strong> more effective monitoring of feed consumption in familyrun<strong>and</strong> -operated farms (Asian <strong>Shrimp</strong> Culture Council 1994; Lin 1995).When pond water containing high concentrations of nutrients <strong>and</strong> organic matter from a large numberof shrimp farms is discharged into coastal waters, <strong>the</strong> effects can be negative, depending on <strong>the</strong>ecosystem’s capacity to receive <strong>the</strong> discharges. Potential negative effects include (Clay 1996; Dierberg& Kiattisimkul 1996; Lin 1995):• Unusual rates of sedimentation;• Eutrophication, with increased risk of harmful algal blooms;• Change in <strong>the</strong> nutrient cycle;• Oxygen depletion;• Toxicity from sulfide compounds <strong>and</strong> ammonia following degradation of organic matter; <strong>and</strong>• Increased incidence of disease, stemming from poor water quality <strong>and</strong> stress on marine life.These impacts may be detrimental to <strong>the</strong> farm itself, to neighboring farms, <strong>and</strong> to <strong>the</strong> widerenvironment. It should be noted, however, that increased levels of nutrients <strong>and</strong> organic matter may bedesirable for some coastal ecosystems. Indeed one valuable function of mangroves is <strong>the</strong>ir capacity toabsorb <strong>and</strong> use <strong>the</strong> detritus <strong>and</strong> nutrients that arrive in estuaries <strong>and</strong> coastal waters. So long as carrying24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!