FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SHRIMP FARM PRODUCTION SYSTEMSTRADITIONAL/EXTENSIVE SEMI-INTENSIVE INTENSIVE100kg/ha 2,000 kg/ha 6,000 kg/haAVERAGE PRODUCTION PER CROPUnfertilized pondFertilized pondFertilized <strong>and</strong> fed pondFertilized, fed pond with supplementalwater flow <strong>and</strong> aerationContinuous skilled management, uniformponds, formulated feeds, high capitalinvestmentClosed recirculation systemsLow200,000/haIn practice, different people use intensity classifications in different ways, <strong>and</strong> generalizations—such as“intensive shrimp culture is not sustainable”—are often misleading. “Intensity” relates to resourceutilization (l<strong>and</strong>, water, capital, labor, seed, feed, fertilizer, <strong>and</strong> fuel), <strong>and</strong> different systems may bemore or less intensive depending upon which resource is considered. It is important to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>use of all of <strong>the</strong>se resources if a thorough assessment of <strong>the</strong> sustainability of different kinds of shrimpculture is to be made. For example, so-called traditional or extensive systems are generally low oncapital, labor, seed, <strong>and</strong> feed intensity, but use a great deal of l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> water. “Intensive” systems, on<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, are generally low on l<strong>and</strong> intensity, but high on labor, seed, <strong>and</strong> feed intensity.Traditional intensive systems were also high on <strong>the</strong> intensity of water use, but many producers (inThail<strong>and</strong>, for example) now use closed or low water-exchange systems. The desirability <strong>and</strong>sustainability of different systems depends to a great degree on <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>and</strong> availability of <strong>the</strong>sedifferent resources, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se vary tremendously between countries.Traditional/extensive systems“Traditional” shrimp farming is still conducted in some parts of <strong>the</strong> tropics (e.g., West Bengal <strong>and</strong>Kerala in India; see Clay 1996) <strong>and</strong> in low-lying impoundments along bays <strong>and</strong> tidal rivers, often inconjunction with crab <strong>and</strong> finfish. Impoundments range in size from a few hectares to over 100hectares. When local waters are known to have high densities of young shrimp, <strong>the</strong> farmer opens <strong>the</strong>gates, impounds <strong>the</strong> wild shrimp, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n grows <strong>the</strong>m to maturity or whenever <strong>the</strong>y are marketable.The shrimp (along with assorted crabs <strong>and</strong> finfish) feed mainly on natural food in <strong>the</strong> pond. Stockingdensity depends on <strong>the</strong> abundance of wild seed but rarely exceeds 10,000 per hectare. Production iscommonly from continuous or semicontinuous harvesting, <strong>and</strong> ranges from about 50 to several hundredkg/ha/yr (head-on weight).Some farmers stock wild juveniles that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>the</strong>mselves have caught or purchased from fishermen.There may also be some limited fertilization <strong>and</strong> supplementary feeding. The tides provide waterexchange, dependent on <strong>the</strong> height of <strong>the</strong> intertidal zone <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> local tidal regime. Construction <strong>and</strong>operating costs are low. Cast-nets <strong>and</strong> bamboo traps are used to produce <strong>the</strong> harvests.Various forms of polyculture <strong>and</strong> mixed cropping are practiced. <strong>Shrimp</strong> can be grown in <strong>the</strong> same pondas o<strong>the</strong>r species such as milkfish. Ponds may be used for rice production during <strong>the</strong> wet season, <strong>and</strong> forshrimp production during <strong>the</strong> dry season. Examples of salt production (dry) <strong>and</strong> shrimp farming (wet)also occur. Such alternating use of <strong>the</strong> ponds has certain advantages, increasing <strong>the</strong> farmer’s selfsufficiency<strong>and</strong> overall production. In addition, polyculture reduces <strong>the</strong> financial risk involved inshrimp farming. However, it is only feasible in very specific climatic <strong>and</strong> hydrological regimes.15
Semi-intensive systemsTypically conducted at <strong>the</strong> upper end of <strong>the</strong> tidal range, or above <strong>the</strong> high tide line, semi-intensivefarming usually involves carefully laid-out ponds (0.1 to 25 ha), feeding, <strong>and</strong> diesel- or electricalpoweredpumping. Pumps typically exchange 5 to 15% of <strong>the</strong> water each day. With stocking ratesranging from 25,000 to 200,000 juveniles per hectare, <strong>the</strong>re is more competition for <strong>the</strong> natural feed in<strong>the</strong> pond, so <strong>the</strong> farmers augment production with shrimp feed (commercial formulated compoundfeed, “trash” fish, or locally collected mollusks). Construction costs vary from $10,000 to $25,000 perhectare. Wild or hatchery-produced juveniles are sometimes stocked at high densities in nursery pondsuntil <strong>the</strong>y are large enough to be stocked at lower densities in grow-out ponds. The farmer harvests bydraining <strong>the</strong> pond through a net, or by using a harvest pump. Farmers usually renovate <strong>the</strong>ir ponds oncea year. Yields range from around 500 to 10,000 kg (head-on) per hectare per year.Intensive systemsIntensive shrimp farming usually involves small ponds (0.1 to 5 hectares), high stocking densities(more than 200,000 juveniles per hectare), around-<strong>the</strong>-clock management, intensive feeding, wasteremoval, <strong>and</strong> mechanical aeration. Mechanical aeration—<strong>the</strong> addition of oxygen to <strong>the</strong> water—permitsmuch higher stocking densities <strong>and</strong> feeding levels. Water exchange rates for such systems used to bevery high—up to 30% a day, but in recent years (stimulated mainly by a fear of introducing diseasethrough <strong>the</strong> water supply) many farmers in Thail<strong>and</strong> have begun to use low water-exchange systems.These involve zero or minimal water exchange in <strong>the</strong> early part of <strong>the</strong> grow-out cycle, with waterexchanged only as required for water-quality management toward <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> cycle. In some cases,water may be recycled through a storage reservoir, allowing for <strong>the</strong> development of completely closedwater systems, so that <strong>the</strong> only water required is to make up water lost to seepage <strong>and</strong> evaporation.Intensive shrimp culture is also practiced in raceways <strong>and</strong> tanks, which may be covered or indoors,although this method remains relatively unimportant commercially.Construction costs range from $10,000-$25,000 for simple pond systems in developing countries to asmuch as $250,000 per hectare for sophisticated concrete pond, tank, or raceways systems.Sophisticated harvesting techniques <strong>and</strong> easy pond cleaning after harvest permit year-round productionin tropical climates. Yields of 5,000 to 20,000 kg (head-on) per hectare per year are possible, although<strong>the</strong> sustainability of higher rates is questionable. Production costs range from $4 to $8 per kg of liveshrimp. Experience from Taiwan, Republic of China; Thail<strong>and</strong>; <strong>and</strong> Vietnam has shown that intensiveshrimp farms can be converted relatively rapidly <strong>and</strong> without major additional investments to o<strong>the</strong>rspecies such as grouper, seabass, <strong>and</strong> milkfish, although <strong>the</strong>se are generally less profitable.Super-intensive systemsSuperintensive shrimp farming takes even greater control of <strong>the</strong> environment <strong>and</strong> can produce yields of20,000 to 100,000 kg/ha/year. A superintensive shrimp farm in <strong>the</strong> U.S. once produced at <strong>the</strong> rate of100,000 kg/ha/year, but it was wiped out by a viral disease. Thus far, superintensive shrimp farms haveachieved only marginal success. Generally, <strong>the</strong>y require highly skilled managers <strong>and</strong> run <strong>the</strong> risk ofdisease, which leads to crop failures. They can also harm <strong>the</strong> quality of surrounding water by releasingpollutants in effluent, <strong>and</strong> must take steps to prevent o<strong>the</strong>r environmental damage. It seems that annualproduction levels above 10,000 kg per hectare are risky.Owing to <strong>the</strong> high density of stocking, superintensive operations require far less l<strong>and</strong> area to producelarge amounts of shrimp. This fact may act in favor of superintensive operations in <strong>the</strong> future, if <strong>and</strong>when some of <strong>the</strong>se o<strong>the</strong>r problems are solved.16
- Page 7 and 8: sensitivity analysis should include
- Page 9 and 10: ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
- Page 11 and 12: ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
- Page 13 and 14: same time, development is necessary
- Page 15 and 16: Current shrimp farming practice inc
- Page 17 and 18: Current status of the industryToday
- Page 19 and 20: In recent years, several major crop
- Page 21: CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
- Page 24 and 25: FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
- Page 28 and 29: TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
- Page 30 and 31: Shrimp farming systems vary greatly
- Page 32 and 33: creeks, and sea-grass beds, fulfill
- Page 34 and 35: arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
- Page 36 and 37: capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
- Page 38 and 39: shrimp or high-value finfish produc
- Page 40 and 41: In more immediately practical terms
- Page 42 and 43: Disease prevention and managementDi
- Page 44 and 45: (Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
- Page 46 and 47: suitable for human consumption or f
- Page 48 and 49: • Supply and effluent canals shou
- Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
- Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
- Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
- Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
- Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
- Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
- Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- Page 68 and 69: Planning and resource managementIna
- Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
- Page 72 and 73: Conclusions and recommendationsReco
- Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
- Page 76 and 77:
CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASS
- Page 78 and 79:
• Appraisal and supervision missi
- Page 80 and 81:
The structure of the executive summ
- Page 82 and 83:
CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDAT
- Page 84 and 85:
• Requirements and guidance for f
- Page 86 and 87:
EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
- Page 88 and 89:
ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
- Page 90 and 91:
• Sensitivity calculations and an
- Page 92 and 93:
Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
- Page 94 and 95:
ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
- Page 96 and 97:
ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
- Page 98 and 99:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 100 and 101:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 102 and 103:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 104 and 105:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
- Page 106 and 107:
Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
- Page 108 and 109:
Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
- Page 110 and 111:
Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
- Page 112:
World Commission on Environment and