Shrimp Farming and the Environment - Library
Shrimp Farming and the Environment - Library
Shrimp Farming and the Environment - Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Minimizing negative social repercussions <strong>and</strong> maximizing <strong>the</strong> positive ones will require governmentintervention <strong>and</strong> political will. As with environmental impacts, <strong>the</strong> solution to <strong>the</strong>se problems cannot beapplied on a case-by-case basis. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, a planned approach to issues of resource access <strong>and</strong>degradation must be developed, involving some form of l<strong>and</strong>-use planning or zoning. Issues of equity<strong>and</strong> wealth distribution can only be tackled through interventions in <strong>the</strong> form of tax policies, grant aid,credit, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r economic instruments. But any such interventions must take account of <strong>the</strong> inherentrisks associated with aquaculture—risks that are greater for those with fewer financial resources, skills,<strong>and</strong> education.There are two main components to making shrimp aquaculture more socially <strong>and</strong> economicallydesirable:• Reducing <strong>the</strong> negative externalities of resource appropriation or degradation; <strong>and</strong>• Increasing participation of <strong>the</strong> poor in shrimp farming activities, or distributing <strong>the</strong> benefitsmore widely, or both.The first of <strong>the</strong>se will require effective l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> resource use planning. The second will requiregovernment intervention in <strong>the</strong> form of grant aid, credit, tax incentives, or some form of redistributivetaxation (e.g., taxing successful shrimp farmers to generate funding for services or developmentinitiatives for <strong>the</strong> poor). The risks associated with shrimp culture must be taken fully into account whenconsidering promoting shrimp farm development among poorer sectors of society. Ideally, measuresrelating to both of <strong>the</strong>se strategies should form part of a local resource management or integratedcoastal management plan, although provisions regarding taxation <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r economic instruments willdepend critically on compatibility with national policy <strong>and</strong> legislation. Given <strong>the</strong> rate of resourcedegradation in coastal areas of developing countries, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> significant levels of social conflictassociated with shrimp aquaculture in some countries, initiatives along <strong>the</strong>se lines are urgentlyrequired. These approaches are difficult <strong>and</strong> costly but cannot be avoided if shrimp farming is to bemade more sustainable. They are analyzed more fully in Chapter 6.It is notable that nei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong>se issues can be addressed effectively through project-levelenvironmental impact assessment (EIA)—whe<strong>the</strong>r or not social impact assessment is included—exceptin <strong>the</strong> case of large isolated developments. The social problems associated with shrimp culture, as with<strong>the</strong> environmental problems, are generally cumulative <strong>and</strong> incremental in nature, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore requirea broader resource use planning approach.Sector EIA, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, incorporating social impact assessment, may have an important role toplay in developing appropriate sector or natural resource development plans, which may serve as <strong>the</strong>building blocks for broader-based integrated coastal management plans.Summary of measures to reduce social impactsAll those measures discussed in <strong>the</strong> previous chapter, insofar as <strong>the</strong>y reduce environmental impact <strong>and</strong>resource degradation, are likely to help reduce social impacts, as well. In addition, specific measureswill be required to address issues of resource appropriation, income distribution, <strong>and</strong> equity. These arepolitical issues <strong>and</strong> will require political will <strong>and</strong> political solutions at <strong>the</strong> national <strong>and</strong> local levels.However, <strong>the</strong> following specific measures may be appropriate, depending on local circumstances:1. Sector EIA incorporating comprehensive <strong>and</strong> cumulative social impact assessments as well asparticipatory approaches to problem identification <strong>and</strong> solution;2. An aquaculture development plan, preferably developed as part of a wider natural resource orintegrated coastal management plan, drawing on <strong>the</strong> findings of <strong>the</strong> sector EIA. In addition tothose provisions discussed in <strong>the</strong> previous chapter, this plan should include:• Social <strong>and</strong> economic objectives of aquaculture development;• Measures to protect <strong>the</strong> interests <strong>and</strong> rights of existing resource users;• Measures for facilitating access of relatively poor local people to shrimp farming on suitablesites (conditional on <strong>the</strong> measures presented in <strong>the</strong> previous chapters for ensuring moresustainable production). Depending on local circumstances, <strong>the</strong>se might include:• Preferential access to licenses, permits, use-rights, or ownership for local people;• Modest grants <strong>and</strong> limited credit for farm development <strong>and</strong> initial operations;• Tax exemptions or “holidays” during start-up;47