LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held or Attended in 1999-2002 tofur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Work of <strong>the</strong> Consortium.ParticipantsProducersGovt.officialsMultilateralorgsBi-lateralorgsNGOsResearchers/universitiesCommunitygroupsInvestors/FundersBuyersCertifiersTradeassociationsConsultantsSan Francisco, CA,USAOrl<strong>and</strong>o, FL, USATana, MadagascarCartejena, ColombiaPhiladelphia, PA,USARome, ItalyShepardstown, WV,USAMadison, WI, USASevilla, SpainKota Kintabala,Sabah, MalaysiaBrussels, BelgiumBangkok, Thail<strong>and</strong>Bangkok, Thail<strong>and</strong>Bangkok, Thail<strong>and</strong>Washington, DC,USASession on Aquaculture at <strong>the</strong> AAAS annual meeting. February2001Session on <strong>the</strong> work of <strong>the</strong> consortium at <strong>the</strong> World AquacultureSociety annual meeting. January 2001Preliminary meeting with shrimp producers, consultants, NGOs<strong>and</strong> government officials regarding <strong>the</strong> potential of creating BMPbasedregulations, permits <strong>and</strong> licenses for <strong>the</strong> shrimp industry.April 2001.Meeting on certification potential of shrimp aquaculture with <strong>the</strong>Colombian <strong>Shrimp</strong> association. May 2001WWF sponsored meeting on <strong>the</strong> development of a certificationprogram for shrimp aquaculture. July 2001FAO meeting to develop indicators for sustainable shrimpaquaculture. September 2001Keynote address on shrimp aquaculture BMPs to <strong>the</strong> annualmeeting of <strong>the</strong> Aquacultural Engineering Society. October 2001Meeting of Protected Harvest (third party certifier) to discusscertification principles, criteria, <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards with relevance toshrimp aquacultureMeeting with WWF’s Mediterranean Program Office to discussaquaculture <strong>and</strong> marketing strategies. November 2001Meeting with WWF staff in Malaysia <strong>and</strong> Indonesia to discussBMPs for shrimp aquaculture. November 2001Meeting with WWF’s agriculture <strong>and</strong> aquaculture staff to discussstrategies for identifying <strong>and</strong> adopting BMPs to reduce <strong>the</strong> impactsof production. December 2001Meeting in NACA to discuss potential follow-up work of <strong>the</strong>consortium on certification of shrimp aquaculture. December 2001Meeting with GEF to discuss possible follow-up work on shrimpaquaculture <strong>and</strong> mangroves in SE Asia. December 2001Meeting with private company possible roll-out of BMP work onshrimp aquaculture. December 2001Meeting of <strong>the</strong> Seafood Choices Alliance to discuss possiblestrategies to influence seafood consumption in <strong>the</strong> US. January2002125 # # # #75 # # # # # # # # #8 # # # # #30 # # # # # #20 # # # # # # # #20 # # # # # #125 # # # # #12 # #17 #10 #25 #4 # #4 # #3 # #50 # # #92
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held or Attended in 1999-2002 tofur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> Work of <strong>the</strong> Consortium.ParticipantsProducersGovt.officialsMultilateralorgsBi-lateralorgsNGOsResearchers/universitiesCommunitygroupsInvestors/FundersBuyersCertifiersTradeassociationsConsultantsWashington, DC,USAWashington, DC,USAWashington, DC,USAMonterey, CA, USAMeeting with a certifier <strong>and</strong> industry analyst to discuss problems<strong>and</strong> opportunities for BMP-based shrimp aquaculture certification.January 20023 # # #Meeting with <strong>the</strong> IFC to discuss <strong>the</strong> development of a BMP-based 12 # #investment screen <strong>and</strong> also a larger investor round table. January2002Meeting with Isl<strong>and</strong> Press to discuss putting <strong>the</strong> consortium’s 3shrimp aquaculture work into <strong>the</strong> Knowledge <strong>Environment</strong>.January 2002Meeting with donors <strong>and</strong> researchers regarding trends in15 # # # # #aquaculture <strong>and</strong> shrimp aquaculture in particular. January 2002World Aquaculture Session on <strong>the</strong> Potential Uses of BMPs to 75 # # # # # # # # #improve aquaculture performance. January 2002Meeting with <strong>the</strong> Global Aquaculture Alliance. January 2002 2 # #San Diego, CA,USASan Diego, CA,USASan Diego, CA, Meeting with seafood industry analyst to target those companies 2 # #USAmost likely to purchase certified shrimp. January 2002San Diego, CA, Meeting with Monterey Bay Aquarium <strong>and</strong> COMPASS to discuss 5 #USAseafood rankings, aquaculture experts, <strong>and</strong> strategic interventionsneeded to improve <strong>the</strong> performance of aquaculture. January 2002Beijing, China Committee on Fisheries, Sub-committee on aquaculture. First 100 # # # #session. Beijing, China, 18 th -22 nd April 2002.Totals Total of All Consortium Meetings 7925 35 36 18 14 58 54 20 13 10 11 12 4993
- Page 7 and 8:
sensitivity analysis should include
- Page 9 and 10:
ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
- Page 11 and 12:
ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
- Page 13 and 14:
same time, development is necessary
- Page 15 and 16:
Current shrimp farming practice inc
- Page 17 and 18:
Current status of the industryToday
- Page 19 and 20:
In recent years, several major crop
- Page 21:
CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
- Page 24 and 25:
FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
- Page 26 and 27:
FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SH
- Page 28 and 29:
TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
- Page 30 and 31:
Shrimp farming systems vary greatly
- Page 32 and 33:
creeks, and sea-grass beds, fulfill
- Page 34 and 35:
arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
- Page 36 and 37:
capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
- Page 38 and 39:
shrimp or high-value finfish produc
- Page 40 and 41:
In more immediately practical terms
- Page 42 and 43:
Disease prevention and managementDi
- Page 44 and 45:
(Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
- Page 46 and 47:
suitable for human consumption or f
- Page 48 and 49:
• Supply and effluent canals shou
- Page 50 and 51:
CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
- Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
- Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
- Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
- Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
- Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
- Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- Page 68 and 69: Planning and resource managementIna
- Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
- Page 72 and 73: Conclusions and recommendationsReco
- Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
- Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASS
- Page 78 and 79: • Appraisal and supervision missi
- Page 80 and 81: The structure of the executive summ
- Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDAT
- Page 84 and 85: • Requirements and guidance for f
- Page 86 and 87: EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
- Page 88 and 89: ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
- Page 90 and 91: • Sensitivity calculations and an
- Page 92 and 93: Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
- Page 94 and 95: ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
- Page 96 and 97: ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
- Page 98 and 99: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 100 and 101: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 104 and 105: BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
- Page 106 and 107: Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
- Page 108 and 109: Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
- Page 110 and 111: Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
- Page 112: World Commission on Environment and