CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASSESSMENTWhere major aquaculture development projects are proposed, it is essential that project assessment <strong>and</strong>planning is done thoroughly, taking full account of <strong>the</strong> general mitigation measures presented inchapters 3–5, as well as incorporating thorough environmental assessment. It is important that <strong>the</strong>seconsiderations be addressed as early as possible in <strong>the</strong> investment project’s timeline.The investment project cycleInvestment projects, including shrimp farming projects, go through a cycle consisting of three mainphases: preinvestment, investment, <strong>and</strong> operations. Each of <strong>the</strong>se phases includes a number of actions,or steps, that must be taken to finish <strong>the</strong> project. The time schedule or time horizon for each phase mayvary greatly depending on <strong>the</strong> size <strong>and</strong> type of project. Table 8 provides a general illustration of <strong>the</strong>steps in each phase.TABLE 8: THE INVESTMENT PROJECT CYCLEPHASE PLACE IN APPROXIMATELY 3-YEAR CYCLE DURATIONPreinvestment phaseOpportunity study 1-3monthsPrefeasibility study 1-3monthsFeasibility study 2-12monthsAppraisal report 1-3monthsPreparation 3-6monthsEvaluation 1-2monthsInvestment phaseNegotiation/contracting3-24monthsEngineering design 3-12monthsConstruction 6-12monthsPre-production marketing 1-12monthsTraining 2-12monthsImplementation 2-6monthsEvaluation 1-2monthsOperations phaseCommissioning <strong>and</strong>1-4start-upmonthsReplacement <strong>and</strong>3-12rehabilitationmonthsExpansion <strong>and</strong>innovationNote: This table is based on World Bank literature describing large projects. Smaller projects will, of course, haveshorter time spans than represented here.3-12monthsBased on experience with previous World Bank–funded aquaculture projects, Zweig & Braga (1996)have identified a set of guidelines for <strong>the</strong> planning <strong>and</strong> implementation of such projects, particularly65
those in developing countries. The main recommendations from this document are highlighted below,supplemented with conclusions from <strong>the</strong> current study.Project identification <strong>and</strong> preparationProjects should be based on sound concepts, using already implemented technology <strong>and</strong> institutionalframeworks. Aquaculture projects must be designed on <strong>the</strong> basis of well-founded market analysis <strong>and</strong>technical information about fish resources, environmental conditions <strong>and</strong> legislation, suitabletechnology, <strong>and</strong> prevailing market conditions.• Demonstration projects should be modest, simple, closely monitored, <strong>and</strong> involve only proventechnologies;• A pilot phase should be m<strong>and</strong>atory for any projects that seek to introduce new technologies orcredit <strong>and</strong> institutional arrangements;• All communities affected by <strong>the</strong> project should be involved in <strong>the</strong> preparation <strong>and</strong> planningprocess from <strong>the</strong> beginning; <strong>and</strong>• Project preparation <strong>and</strong> appraisal are fundamental stages for successful implementation; <strong>the</strong>yshould not be skipped or shortened, particularly for big projects covering large <strong>and</strong>/or diverseareas.Projects must incorporate some degree of flexibility to be able to adjust to changes in market <strong>and</strong>environmental conditions, development of better technologies, <strong>and</strong> disease outbreaks. Attention shouldbe paid to possible shifts in government policies, particularly during long preparation <strong>and</strong>implementation periods. As a rule, <strong>the</strong> simpler <strong>the</strong> project, <strong>the</strong> less difficult it is to respond to changingconditions.Technical aspectsFull account should be taken of <strong>the</strong> siting, design, <strong>and</strong> technology recommendations to minimizeenvironmental impacts, discussed in Chapter 3:• A primary requirement for a successful aquaculture project is a reliable <strong>and</strong> adequate watersupply;• The choice of site must take into consideration technical, managerial, marketing, <strong>and</strong> socialconstraints;• Aquaculture projects should avoid dependence on wild-caught seed supply;• The bidding process for equipment acquisition should give greater weight to technicalconsiderations <strong>and</strong> quality of equipment, <strong>and</strong> less to price;• When using contractors in a project, <strong>the</strong> selection process should consider both competence<strong>and</strong> experience in <strong>the</strong> type of work to be done; <strong>and</strong>• Adequate time for completion of work in advance of contract awards, as well as forunexpected events, should be factored into planning.Institutional aspects• Project organization could be kept as simple as possible <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities ofpeople <strong>and</strong> agencies involved in <strong>the</strong> project, both existing <strong>and</strong> newly required ones, should beclearly defined. There must be a clear consensus among <strong>the</strong> Bank <strong>and</strong> all parties involvedabout <strong>the</strong> nature (public <strong>and</strong> private), objectives, organization, financing, <strong>and</strong> operatingprinciples of <strong>the</strong> various bodies;• Agencies tend to work more closely toge<strong>the</strong>r at lower levels of government; placingresponsibility for meeting requirements at <strong>the</strong> district or local level ra<strong>the</strong>r than at <strong>the</strong> centrallevel usually improves performance; <strong>and</strong>• The agencies responsible for technical aspects of <strong>the</strong> project should work very closely withthose responsible for providing credit for project implementation.Implementation issues• Thorough project preparation is <strong>the</strong> best insurance against occurrence of technical problemsduring project implementation; preparation should include a good set of initial technicaldesigns, <strong>and</strong> detailed water <strong>and</strong> soil analysis;66
- Page 7 and 8:
sensitivity analysis should include
- Page 9 and 10:
ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
- Page 11 and 12:
ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
- Page 13 and 14:
same time, development is necessary
- Page 15 and 16:
Current shrimp farming practice inc
- Page 17 and 18:
Current status of the industryToday
- Page 19 and 20:
In recent years, several major crop
- Page 21:
CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
- Page 24 and 25:
FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
- Page 26 and 27: FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SH
- Page 28 and 29: TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
- Page 30 and 31: Shrimp farming systems vary greatly
- Page 32 and 33: creeks, and sea-grass beds, fulfill
- Page 34 and 35: arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
- Page 36 and 37: capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
- Page 38 and 39: shrimp or high-value finfish produc
- Page 40 and 41: In more immediately practical terms
- Page 42 and 43: Disease prevention and managementDi
- Page 44 and 45: (Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
- Page 46 and 47: suitable for human consumption or f
- Page 48 and 49: • Supply and effluent canals shou
- Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
- Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
- Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
- Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
- Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
- Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
- Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- Page 68 and 69: Planning and resource managementIna
- Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
- Page 72 and 73: Conclusions and recommendationsReco
- Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
- Page 78 and 79: • Appraisal and supervision missi
- Page 80 and 81: The structure of the executive summ
- Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDAT
- Page 84 and 85: • Requirements and guidance for f
- Page 86 and 87: EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
- Page 88 and 89: ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
- Page 90 and 91: • Sensitivity calculations and an
- Page 92 and 93: Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
- Page 94 and 95: ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
- Page 96 and 97: ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
- Page 98 and 99: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 100 and 101: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 102 and 103: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 104 and 105: BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
- Page 106 and 107: Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
- Page 108 and 109: Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
- Page 110 and 111: Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
- Page 112: World Commission on Environment and