The structure of <strong>the</strong> executive summary should follow <strong>the</strong> structure of <strong>the</strong> main body of <strong>the</strong> study. Anoutline or blueprint for a feasibility study is presented in Annex 5.Impact assessment <strong>and</strong> monitoringIt is important when planning a shrimp farming venture that an environmental impact assessment beundertaken. The discussion of impacts <strong>and</strong> mitigation measures in Chapters 3–5 of this report provide abroad outline of <strong>the</strong> kinds of impacts that should be addressed, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mitigation measures that mightbe proposed in such assessments. Detailed guidelines for <strong>the</strong> environmental assessment of aquacultureprojects <strong>and</strong> related development programs have been produced recently by SEACAM (1999).These assessments must be undertaken with maximum public <strong>and</strong> stakeholder participation <strong>and</strong>, inaddition to <strong>the</strong> more usual technical issues, should address, at a minimum:• Siting;• The potential for cumulative or additive impacts;• <strong>Environment</strong>al capacity of <strong>the</strong> surrounding area;• Social impact (including loss of access to communal property <strong>and</strong> water);• Alternative technologies; <strong>and</strong>• Employment opportunities.Once <strong>the</strong> project is initiated, ongoing monitoring <strong>and</strong> reporting should be assured, ei<strong>the</strong>r by agovernment mechanism or by <strong>the</strong> project proponent, with government oversight. In ei<strong>the</strong>r case, shrimpfarmers should be required to provide regular reports to confirm that <strong>the</strong>y are operating within acceptedst<strong>and</strong>ards. Deviations from <strong>the</strong> norm by one operator can have disastrous effects on a number of o<strong>the</strong>rshrimp farmers.<strong>Environment</strong>al assessment should be integrated fully with project planning <strong>and</strong> investment appraisal, sothat it can make a positive contribution to project planning, design, <strong>and</strong> operation. This means that <strong>the</strong>EIA team should work closely with economists <strong>and</strong> engineers from <strong>the</strong> outset. In this way, EIAbecomes a positive tool to promote sustainable development, ra<strong>the</strong>r than a restrictive (<strong>and</strong> in somecases destructive) set of administrative procedures.Summary of minimal requirementsIn summary, any proposal for <strong>the</strong> development of a major shrimp farm or shrimp farm developmentproject must include provision for a comprehensive feasibility study (based on earlier opportunity <strong>and</strong>prefeasibility studies). A more complete outline for a typical feasibility study for a shrimp aquacultureproject is included in Annex 1. However, at a minimum, an assessment should address:• The natural resources <strong>and</strong> conditions available to support <strong>the</strong> project;• The risk of disease <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> existence of industry or government strategies to prevent ormanage it;• Commercial <strong>and</strong> market conditions, such as availability <strong>and</strong> cost of production factors,domestic production <strong>and</strong> imports, <strong>and</strong> trends in total dem<strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> most promising markets(including foreign markets);• Similar projects in o<strong>the</strong>r regions or countries <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir success, <strong>and</strong> possible linkages to o<strong>the</strong>rindustries;• The general investment climate;• The likely environmental <strong>and</strong> social impacts;• Industrial policies <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r relevant legal/regulatory aspects; <strong>and</strong>• The extent to which <strong>the</strong> project fits with existing development, natural resource developmentplans, <strong>and</strong> integrated coastal management plans.In addition, <strong>the</strong> proposal should include a comprehensive environmental impact assessment thataddresses <strong>and</strong> evaluates, at a minimum, <strong>the</strong> following areas:• Alternative siting opportunities, designs, <strong>and</strong> technologies;• Alternative management practices <strong>and</strong> levels of intensity;69
• Conversion of natural habitat <strong>and</strong> of l<strong>and</strong> with alternative productive uses;• Pollution issues such as organic matter production <strong>and</strong> disposal; nutrient production <strong>and</strong>disposal; chemical use <strong>and</strong> disposal;• Upstream impacts on capture fisheries (shrimp broodstock <strong>and</strong> seed supply, fishmeal <strong>and</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r feed sources);• Genetic pollution (species, races, <strong>and</strong> associated organisms);• Disease spread <strong>and</strong> disease management;• Social impacts related directly or indirectly to any of <strong>the</strong> above;• Mitigation measures;• An environmental management plan; <strong>and</strong>• Provisions for monitoring, reporting, <strong>and</strong> executing a planned response to any social orenvironmental problems.Details of existing relevant plans (aquaculture development plans, natural resource management plans;integrated coastal management plans) should be provided, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> ways in which <strong>the</strong> project complieswith, or fur<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong>se plans should be described.At all stages of <strong>the</strong> project, <strong>the</strong> proponents should collaborate with governments <strong>and</strong> NGOs asguardians of <strong>the</strong> public interest.70
- Page 7 and 8:
sensitivity analysis should include
- Page 9 and 10:
ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
- Page 11 and 12:
ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
- Page 13 and 14:
same time, development is necessary
- Page 15 and 16:
Current shrimp farming practice inc
- Page 17 and 18:
Current status of the industryToday
- Page 19 and 20:
In recent years, several major crop
- Page 21:
CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
- Page 24 and 25:
FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
- Page 26 and 27:
FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SH
- Page 28 and 29:
TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
- Page 30 and 31: Shrimp farming systems vary greatly
- Page 32 and 33: creeks, and sea-grass beds, fulfill
- Page 34 and 35: arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
- Page 36 and 37: capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
- Page 38 and 39: shrimp or high-value finfish produc
- Page 40 and 41: In more immediately practical terms
- Page 42 and 43: Disease prevention and managementDi
- Page 44 and 45: (Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
- Page 46 and 47: suitable for human consumption or f
- Page 48 and 49: • Supply and effluent canals shou
- Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
- Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
- Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
- Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
- Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
- Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
- Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- Page 68 and 69: Planning and resource managementIna
- Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
- Page 72 and 73: Conclusions and recommendationsReco
- Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
- Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASS
- Page 78 and 79: • Appraisal and supervision missi
- Page 82 and 83: CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDAT
- Page 84 and 85: • Requirements and guidance for f
- Page 86 and 87: EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
- Page 88 and 89: ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
- Page 90 and 91: • Sensitivity calculations and an
- Page 92 and 93: Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
- Page 94 and 95: ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
- Page 96 and 97: ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
- Page 98 and 99: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 100 and 101: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 102 and 103: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 104 and 105: BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
- Page 106 and 107: Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
- Page 108 and 109: Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
- Page 110 and 111: Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
- Page 112: World Commission on Environment and