creeks, <strong>and</strong> sea-grass beds, fulfill a wide variety of functions. It is important not to ignore <strong>the</strong> nonmangrovecomponents of <strong>the</strong>se ecosystems, which in some cases may be at least as valuable as <strong>the</strong>mangrove.Estuarine <strong>and</strong> lagoon systems fulfill <strong>the</strong> following major functions:• Provide nurseries for inl<strong>and</strong>, coastal, <strong>and</strong> offshore fisheries, including shrimp, fishes, <strong>and</strong>crabs; <strong>and</strong>• Assimilate nutrients <strong>and</strong> use organic matter, turning some of it into sediment.Mangrove probably enhances <strong>the</strong>se functions, <strong>and</strong> in addition:• Produces a range of wood <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r forest products (firewood, poles, wood chips, charcoal,bark for tanning <strong>and</strong> dyes, honey, etc.);• Protects shoreline against flooding <strong>and</strong> inundation in storms; <strong>and</strong>• Increases sedimentation <strong>and</strong> accretion, <strong>and</strong> reduces erosion.It is also commonly claimed that mangrove has high biodiversity value. In fact, most mangrove forestitself is ra<strong>the</strong>r impoverished, consisting of few species due to its varying water level, salinity, anaerobicconditions, <strong>and</strong> low light. However, mangrove forests are important to <strong>the</strong> overall biodiversity of itswider estuarine systems, as a source of nutrients <strong>and</strong> detritus <strong>and</strong> as shelter for a variety of species.Mature mangrove also harbors many rare or unique species. These <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r values <strong>and</strong> functions havebeen widely reported <strong>and</strong> described in <strong>the</strong> literature, <strong>and</strong> it is now widely accepted that mangroveconservation should be a high priority.Reduction of mangrove forestsMangroves constitute an important part of <strong>the</strong> tropical coastline. At one time, as much as 75% oftropical coastlines were likely covered with mangroves. The United Nations <strong>Environment</strong>al Program(UNEP) now estimates that about half of <strong>the</strong> world’s mangrove areas have been destroyed. Somemangroves have become established due to poor upl<strong>and</strong> management practices, especially fromextractive industries such as forestry, agriculture, <strong>and</strong> mining, over <strong>the</strong> past few centuries (Clay 1998,personal communication).Mangroves are under intense pressure from a suite of development activities, including overexploitationfor firewood, poles, <strong>and</strong> charcoal production; conversion to agriculture, salt farming, <strong>and</strong>coastal aquaculture; <strong>and</strong> urban development. The relative contribution of <strong>the</strong>se different activities tomangrove destruction varies widely from country to country <strong>and</strong> region to region. Although <strong>the</strong> dataare incomplete <strong>and</strong> often contested, <strong>the</strong>re is no doubt that shrimp farming has been a significant causeof destruction in some areas (Asian Development Bank/Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia[ADB/NACA] 1995; Primavera 1991; Clay 1998; Boyd 1997.) In <strong>the</strong> countries that are <strong>the</strong> largestproducers of farmed shrimp, NACA reports that 20–50% of all current mangrove deforestation is dueto shrimp farming. In areas of Ecuador <strong>and</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>, for example, large areas of mangrove may havebeen destroyed for shrimp ponds. In many instances, however, shrimp farms were constructed inmangrove areas that had previously been deforested for wood products, making it difficult to attribute<strong>the</strong> original cause of mangrove loss.Although mangroves are now widely recognized as being unsuitable for market-oriented shrimpaquaculture development for a variety of reasons (discussed below), primary or secondary mangroveforests are still converted to shrimp ponds in many countries. In Thail<strong>and</strong>, for example, governmentagencies have had little success in preventing <strong>the</strong> clearing of protected mangrove forests (MIDAS1995). Even in wetl<strong>and</strong>s under consideration as RAMSAR sites, illegal shrimp farmers seeking newl<strong>and</strong> have established <strong>the</strong>ir ponds (Anon. 1997a). Major shrimp producers from Thail<strong>and</strong> are reportedto have exp<strong>and</strong>ed into Koh Kong Province of Cambodia, where <strong>the</strong> environment minister has expressedconcern for <strong>the</strong> mangrove forests of <strong>the</strong> province.It should be remembered, however, that coastal resources, <strong>and</strong> in particular mangrove <strong>and</strong> estuarinesystems, have been under intense pressure from increased population <strong>and</strong> development dem<strong>and</strong>s formany years. Displaced <strong>and</strong> migrant people have often been forced into coastal areas, where <strong>the</strong>y findopportunities to collect wood for fuel, charcoal, <strong>and</strong> poles, to make salt, <strong>and</strong> to fish. Significant area21
has also been converted to agricultural l<strong>and</strong>. It is precisely because <strong>the</strong>se resources are often on publicaccessproperty that settlers have been able to do this. However, much of <strong>the</strong> wood extraction <strong>and</strong>fishery activity has been unsustainable—<strong>and</strong>, coupled with <strong>the</strong> conversion activities, this has led tosignificant degradation of mangrove <strong>and</strong> estuarine resources in some countries. In o<strong>the</strong>r words,controlling shrimp farm development alone will not save mangrove, <strong>and</strong> may not even slow <strong>the</strong> rate ofdestruction in some areas. A much broader policy, planning, <strong>and</strong> regulatory framework will be requiredto stem <strong>the</strong> degradation of coastal resources.Suitability of mangrove areas for shrimp farmingMangrove forests are not considered to be <strong>the</strong> best sites for semi-intensive or intensive shrimp farms.Boyd (1997) lists <strong>the</strong> following problems associated with shrimp farming in <strong>the</strong> intertidal zone:• Soils are often highly acidic <strong>and</strong> contain large amounts of organic matter;• Water exchange is incomplete, so pond effluents may not be washed completely away; <strong>and</strong>• Crabs <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r possible carriers of shrimp diseases are abundant.In addition to <strong>the</strong>se reasons for not establishing shrimp farms in primary or secondary mangrove areas,Boyd notes that it is in <strong>the</strong> farmers’ interest to preserve <strong>the</strong> mangroves, since <strong>the</strong>se forests are capableof efficiently removing solids <strong>and</strong> nutrients from shrimp farm effluents (Robertson & Phillips 1993). Inaddition to cleaning discharges from shrimp ponds, mangrove can stimulate <strong>the</strong> productivity of coastalareas, <strong>the</strong>reby improving coastal fisheries, minimizing pollution of <strong>the</strong> coastal environment, <strong>and</strong>providing higher water quality for shrimp farming. However, <strong>the</strong>se positive effects can be overriddenby discharging amounts of nutrients greater than <strong>the</strong> carrying capacity of <strong>the</strong> local ecosystem, bydischarging concentrated pulses of nutrients <strong>and</strong> organic matter, <strong>and</strong> by introducing chemicals <strong>and</strong>antibiotics (used to treat diseases <strong>and</strong> improve pond quality), all of which can be locally harmful.Despite this general warning about avoiding shrimp culture farms in mangrove forests, <strong>the</strong> severity of<strong>the</strong> constraint should not be overemphasized. A NACA/ADB survey (ADB/NACA 1995) of shrimpfarms in 12 countries in Asia showed that while an average 31% (range 0–88%) of intensive farmswere sited in what was previously mangrove, soil acidity was reported as a significant problem in only5% of <strong>the</strong>m overall (range 0–6%). While <strong>the</strong>se low figures may in part reflect ignorance on <strong>the</strong> part of<strong>the</strong> farmers as to <strong>the</strong> causes of water quality problems, <strong>the</strong>y do suggest that some mangrove soils areindeed suitable—or at least acceptable—for shrimp production. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, most mangrove soils arepotential acid sulphate soils that may not become acidic if disturbance is limited <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> soil is notdried out, as is often <strong>the</strong> case with more extensive systems.Mitigation of threats to habitatThere are three possibilities for minimizing <strong>the</strong> conversion of natural habitat to shrimp farms. First,shrimp farms can be constructed away from mangrove areas altoge<strong>the</strong>r. The (large-scale) shrimpfarming industry organizations, several NGOs, o<strong>the</strong>r international organizations, <strong>and</strong> most governmentsin <strong>the</strong> largest producer countries of farmed shrimp now agree that shrimp farms should not beestablished in mangrove forests. Unfortunately, such avoidance may result in destruction of o<strong>the</strong>rnatural habitats (such as o<strong>the</strong>r wetl<strong>and</strong>s, forests, salt marshes, mud flats, salt flats) with <strong>the</strong>ir ownnatural functions <strong>and</strong> biodiversity value, or conversion from o<strong>the</strong>r uses, such as rice farming, coconutplantation, or o<strong>the</strong>r forestry/agriculture. Whe<strong>the</strong>r such changes are desirable will depend on localcircumstances <strong>and</strong> priorities. It should be noted, however, that in some countries (for example,Vietnam), <strong>the</strong> only l<strong>and</strong> available to poor, displaced migrant <strong>and</strong> minority groups is in fact mangrove.Given <strong>the</strong> high population density of such areas <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> limited sustainable productivity of naturalmangrove (Hambrey 1993), such settlements are inevitably resulting in overexploitation or conversionto agriculture <strong>and</strong>/or aquaculture. In <strong>the</strong>se circumstances, carefully planned <strong>and</strong> limited conversion toaquaculture may be <strong>the</strong> best option, perhaps reducing <strong>the</strong> overall development pressure on mangrove<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r valuable natural habitat.Second, shrimp farms can be constructed on <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>ward fringe of mangrove. In some circumstances,this may be an attractive option, since such l<strong>and</strong> is often partially saline <strong>and</strong> of low value for alternativeuses. If mangrove is present, it may be highly degraded as a result of human pressure or in naturaldecline as part of <strong>the</strong> mangrove cycle of colonization, accretion, <strong>and</strong> stabilization. Ponds may beconstructed so that a belt of mangrove forest is maintained along <strong>the</strong> coast, with <strong>the</strong> ponds locatedimmediately behind <strong>the</strong> mangrove belt (Barg 199b). There are operating examples of such an22
- Page 7 and 8: sensitivity analysis should include
- Page 9 and 10: ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
- Page 11 and 12: ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
- Page 13 and 14: same time, development is necessary
- Page 15 and 16: Current shrimp farming practice inc
- Page 17 and 18: Current status of the industryToday
- Page 19 and 20: In recent years, several major crop
- Page 21: CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
- Page 24 and 25: FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
- Page 26 and 27: FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SH
- Page 28 and 29: TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
- Page 30 and 31: Shrimp farming systems vary greatly
- Page 34 and 35: arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
- Page 36 and 37: capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
- Page 38 and 39: shrimp or high-value finfish produc
- Page 40 and 41: In more immediately practical terms
- Page 42 and 43: Disease prevention and managementDi
- Page 44 and 45: (Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
- Page 46 and 47: suitable for human consumption or f
- Page 48 and 49: • Supply and effluent canals shou
- Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
- Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
- Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
- Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
- Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
- Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
- Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- Page 68 and 69: Planning and resource managementIna
- Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
- Page 72 and 73: Conclusions and recommendationsReco
- Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
- Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASS
- Page 78 and 79: • Appraisal and supervision missi
- Page 80 and 81: The structure of the executive summ
- Page 82 and 83:
CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDAT
- Page 84 and 85:
• Requirements and guidance for f
- Page 86 and 87:
EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
- Page 88 and 89:
ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
- Page 90 and 91:
• Sensitivity calculations and an
- Page 92 and 93:
Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
- Page 94 and 95:
ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
- Page 96 and 97:
ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
- Page 98 and 99:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 100 and 101:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 102 and 103:
LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 104 and 105:
BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
- Page 106 and 107:
Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
- Page 108 and 109:
Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
- Page 110 and 111:
Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
- Page 112:
World Commission on Environment and