CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, ANDFURTHER COURSES OF ACTIONIt is clear from <strong>the</strong> foregoing chapters that shrimp farming has been a tremendous development successin many ways, generating very high returns to relatively poor coastal areas, in addition to generatingmuch-needed foreign revenue. It is one of <strong>the</strong> few feasible activities in <strong>the</strong> coastal zone that offer realpotential for greatly improving <strong>the</strong> living st<strong>and</strong>ards of poor <strong>and</strong> often l<strong>and</strong>less people in developingcountries. But can shrimp be farmed sustainably?Relative sustainabilityThere is no simple answer to this seemingly simple question about sustainability. If asked in relation to<strong>the</strong> use of cars, or <strong>the</strong> production of crops using fertilizer <strong>and</strong> pesticides, or <strong>the</strong> conversion of rawmaterials in industrial processes, <strong>the</strong> answer would be equally difficult <strong>and</strong> controversial. This isbecause <strong>the</strong>re is no such thing as absolute sustainability, <strong>and</strong> because <strong>the</strong> idea of sustainability involvesa wide range of different, <strong>and</strong> in some cases contradictory, elements, which in practice are givengreater or lesser weight according to culture <strong>and</strong> development status. The analysis <strong>and</strong> discussion in <strong>the</strong>preceding chapters shows just how complex this issue is, <strong>and</strong> how unrealistic it is to offer a simpleanswer.Sustainability can be discussed in relative terms, however. Overall, shrimp farming is very similar tomany o<strong>the</strong>r forms of agriculture, insofar as it involves conversion of significant areas of natural habitat,nutrient <strong>and</strong> organic enrichment, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of chemicals of various forms. It may be more or lesssustainable than capture fisheries, depending on how well <strong>the</strong> two industries are managed. It isprobably ra<strong>the</strong>r more sustainable than many industrial activities, measured against a wide range ofcriteria.The efficiency of resource utilization is sometimes used as a practical criterion for measuringsustainability, or maximizing such efficiency may be an objective of sustainable projects. In practice,<strong>and</strong> especially with regard to agriculture <strong>and</strong> aquaculture, resource utilization is usually measured interms of resources used per unit of production by weight. For many developing countries, a morerational <strong>and</strong> practical sustainable development objective may be to maximize <strong>the</strong> value of productionrelative to <strong>the</strong> resources consumed. On this basis, both extensive <strong>and</strong> intensive shrimp farming scorerelatively well. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, most forms of shrimp farming use limited amounts of nonrenewablenatural resources, although energy use is sometimes significant in highly intensive systems.Atmospheric pollution is insignificant, <strong>and</strong> most forms of aquatic pollution can be reduced to lowlevels with appropriate design <strong>and</strong> management practices.Sustainability is often discussed in relation to intensity, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is a common assumption that moreintensive systems are less sustainable—but such an assumption can be misleading. As with agriculture,<strong>the</strong>re is a tradeoff between, on <strong>the</strong> one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> conversion of large areas of natural habitat (oralternative l<strong>and</strong> uses) for extensive aquaculture with lesser use of inputs <strong>and</strong>, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>conversion of smaller areas for more intensive cultivation with higher use of inputs. It is impossible tosay which of <strong>the</strong>se is more or less sustainable without reference to local circumstances <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> relativescarcity of different resources (l<strong>and</strong>, water, inputs, <strong>and</strong> skills).Disease so far appears to pose <strong>the</strong> greatest threat to <strong>the</strong> sustainability of <strong>the</strong> shrimp farming industry.Whe<strong>the</strong>r shrimp are particularly susceptible to viral diseases—or whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> severity <strong>and</strong> incidence ofdisease among cultivated shrimp has resulted more from poor siting, design, <strong>and</strong> management—is notclear. But <strong>the</strong>re is little doubt that improvements in siting, design, <strong>and</strong> management, coupled withcomprehensive measures to minimize disease spread, will significantly reduce disease incidence.In conclusion, shrimp farming—both in general <strong>and</strong> in its various forms—is more or less sustainablethan o<strong>the</strong>r activities depending on <strong>the</strong> criteria used, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> weighting <strong>the</strong>y are given. The policyquestion should not be, “Is shrimp farming sustainable?” but ra<strong>the</strong>r, “Can shrimp farming be mademore sustainable?” <strong>and</strong> in particular, “Can it be made to reach specific st<strong>and</strong>ards of sustainability?”that are set by governments, agencies, NGOs, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs.The answer to <strong>the</strong>se questions, as shown in previous chapters, is a conditional “yes.” The conditionsare complex <strong>and</strong> difficult to implement; thus shrimp farming should be promoted or facilitated by71
governments, banks, <strong>and</strong> international agencies with caution. However, <strong>the</strong> potential benefits to bederived from shrimp farming are so great that every effort should be made to meet <strong>the</strong>se conditions.Reasons for unsustainable shrimp culture<strong>Shrimp</strong> farming has often turned out to be unsustainable in practice. It is important to underst<strong>and</strong> whyif we are to make it more, or “acceptably,” sustainable. The lack of sustainability to date has resultedmainly from <strong>the</strong> following factors:• It is a relatively new activity that can be extremely profitable; it has <strong>the</strong>refore tended todevelop overly rapidly, without adequate planning or regulation;• Since it generates significant foreign currency earnings, many governments are keen topromote ra<strong>the</strong>r than restrain <strong>the</strong> shrimp industry (thus promoting environmental conservation)by offering generous tax incentives <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r inducements;• Disease, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of chemicals associated with disease prevention <strong>and</strong> treatment, are majorproblems in <strong>the</strong> industry, related partly to <strong>the</strong> unplanned <strong>and</strong> unregulated development alreadynoted;• It is possible to farm shrimp in areas where resource use rights or ownership are often unclearor lacking; this situation can contribute to resource appropriation by more powerful sectors ofsociety, which may in some cases lead to corruption, social unrest, <strong>and</strong> violence;• It is possible to farm shrimp in areas (such as salt marshes, s<strong>and</strong>-flats <strong>and</strong> mud-flats, <strong>and</strong>mangroves) that have been little developed because of <strong>the</strong>ir unsuitability for agriculture orurban /industrial development; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se areas often have high environmental value;• It is possible to farm shrimp in inl<strong>and</strong> areas where it may compete with agricultural activitiessuch as rice farming; this may result in accidental or irresponsible practices which result insalinization of l<strong>and</strong> with agricultural potential, <strong>and</strong> lead to social conflict;• <strong>Shrimp</strong> aquaculture generally requires significant investment in ei<strong>the</strong>r l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> water (formore extensive systems) or inputs (for more intensive systems); <strong>the</strong> need for investment fundsmakes <strong>the</strong> activity less accessible to <strong>the</strong> poorer sectors of society, <strong>and</strong> it may <strong>the</strong>reforeincrease inequity; <strong>and</strong>• Intensive shrimp farming still depends heavily on fishmeal in formulated feeds; given <strong>the</strong> stateof capture fisheries <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> increasing dem<strong>and</strong> for fish products, <strong>the</strong> price may increasesignificantly in <strong>the</strong> future, undermining <strong>the</strong> profitability of intensive aquaculture.Conditions for improved sustainabilityIt is clear that more sustainable shrimp farming will be difficult to achieve without a comprehensive<strong>and</strong> integrated set of interventions <strong>and</strong> initiatives by government, development agencies, planners,extension agents, farmers, NGOs, processors/traders, <strong>and</strong> researchers. Toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong>se parties shouldpromote or facilitate:• More rational <strong>and</strong> appropriate l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> water use;• More rational <strong>and</strong> equitable resource access or allocation;• Conflict resolution;• Protection of <strong>the</strong> environment;• Improved monitoring <strong>and</strong> regulation related to disease incidence; <strong>and</strong>• Improved water management, supply, <strong>and</strong> wastewater disposal.The role of national <strong>and</strong> local governments in coordinating <strong>and</strong> promoting appropriate interventionswill be crucial to <strong>the</strong> future sustainability of shrimp culture. Legal <strong>and</strong> planning frameworks may needto be adapted <strong>and</strong> improved to take account of <strong>the</strong> specific requirements for <strong>the</strong> industry’ssustainability. Ideally, <strong>the</strong>se frameworks would specifically address <strong>the</strong> needs of coastal aquaculture(FAO 1998), <strong>and</strong> would include:• Provision for sector environmental assessment, leading to <strong>the</strong> creation of provincial or districtlevelcoastal aquaculture development <strong>and</strong> environmental management plans;• Provisions for <strong>the</strong> development of national guidelines or codes of practice for <strong>the</strong> design <strong>and</strong>operation of coastal aquaculture, <strong>and</strong>/or procedures for developing such guidelines atprovincial or district levels; <strong>and</strong>72
- Page 7 and 8:
sensitivity analysis should include
- Page 9 and 10:
ABBREVIATIONSMTkgmcmhaozPUDFOBCIFC&
- Page 11 and 12:
ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORTIn Chapte
- Page 13 and 14:
same time, development is necessary
- Page 15 and 16:
Current shrimp farming practice inc
- Page 17 and 18:
Current status of the industryToday
- Page 19 and 20:
In recent years, several major crop
- Page 21:
CHAPTER 2: SHRIMP FARMING SYSTEMSSh
- Page 24 and 25:
FeedsHatcheries use a combination o
- Page 26 and 27:
FIGURE 8. CONTINUUM OF DIFFERENT SH
- Page 28 and 29:
TABLE 3. COMPARISON OF INPUTS FOR T
- Page 30 and 31:
Shrimp farming systems vary greatly
- Page 32 and 33: creeks, and sea-grass beds, fulfill
- Page 34 and 35: arrangement in Thailand, for exampl
- Page 36 and 37: capacity is not exceeded, the nutri
- Page 38 and 39: shrimp or high-value finfish produc
- Page 40 and 41: In more immediately practical terms
- Page 42 and 43: Disease prevention and managementDi
- Page 44 and 45: (Raa 1996) indicates that it is pos
- Page 46 and 47: suitable for human consumption or f
- Page 48 and 49: • Supply and effluent canals shou
- Page 50 and 51: CHAPTER 4: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC IMPA
- Page 52 and 53: opportunities would need to be iden
- Page 54 and 55: 26 workdays per hectare, and an ext
- Page 56 and 57: One of the key elements for success
- Page 58 and 59: Minimizing negative social repercus
- Page 60 and 61: CHAPTER 5: FINANCIAL RISKS ASSOCIAT
- Page 62 and 63: Credit riskAccess to credit at fair
- Page 64 and 65: Natural factorsShrimp diseaseThe ou
- Page 66 and 67: CHAPTER 6: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- Page 68 and 69: Planning and resource managementIna
- Page 70 and 71: Such initiatives have been or are b
- Page 72 and 73: Conclusions and recommendationsReco
- Page 74 and 75: equired to promote sustainability a
- Page 76 and 77: CHAPTER 7: PROJECT PLANNING AND ASS
- Page 78 and 79: • Appraisal and supervision missi
- Page 80 and 81: The structure of the executive summ
- Page 84 and 85: • Requirements and guidance for f
- Page 86 and 87: EmploymentAs mentioned in the repor
- Page 88 and 89: ANNEX 1: A BLUEPRINT FOR FEASIBILIT
- Page 90 and 91: • Sensitivity calculations and an
- Page 92 and 93: Table A4: World shrimp farming prod
- Page 94 and 95: ANNEX 4: CASE STUDIES UNDERTAKEN BY
- Page 96 and 97: ColombiaThe Adoption of Good Manage
- Page 98 and 99: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 100 and 101: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 102 and 103: LocationAppendix A--Meetings Held o
- Page 104 and 105: BIBLIOGRAPHYAdger, W.N. 1998. Susta
- Page 106 and 107: Claridge, G. 1996. Legal approaches
- Page 108 and 109: Hambrey, J.B., M. Phillips, K. Chow
- Page 110 and 111: Phillips, M.J., & D.J. Macintosh. 1
- Page 112: World Commission on Environment and