View - ResearchGate

Experiences with Sparky, a Social Robot 177as covering the eyes, trapping it, pushing it backwards and engaging in verbalabuse. Switching the robot to a sad, nervous or fearful emotional state actuallyincreased the abuse. Moving to an angry and aggressive emotional stateseemed to create a newfound respect.Older girls were generally gentle with the robot. Girls often touched therobot, said soothing things to it, and were, on occasion, protective of the robot.If an older girl did provoke Sparky a little and it switched into a sad emotion,empathy was the result. It should be noted that although the responses for olderboys and girls were stereotypical, exceptions were rare.Most adult interaction was collected in our lab. Adults tended to treat therobot like an animal or a small child and generally gave the impression thatthey were dealing with a living creature. Compared to children, they were lessengaged. Gender wasn’t a significant factor in determining adult responses.Response to Sparky’s emotional palette was similar to the results with youngchildren and older girls.In the lab, most adults quickly began to play with the robot. Some however,were clearly unsure what to do. Many of these people eventually began toexperiment with the robot (see below).As we reviewed our data, we found that certain behaviors showed up quiteoften. These are catalogued below.Many subjects touched the robot. This behavior was more prevalent inyoung people, but was still common in adults as well. Once again, olderchildren had responses that varied with gender. Boys were rougher, morelikely to push it or cover its face. Girls tended to stroke and pet the robot.Adult touching was more muted and not dependent on gender.Subjects talked to the robot quite a bit. They sometimes interpreted therobot for other people and “answered” the robot when it made vocalizations.They often heard the robot saying things that it hadn’t andassumed that its speech was just poor, rather than by design. Users oftenasked several questions of the robot, even if the robot ignored them. Themost common question was “what’s your name?”It was very common for subjects to mimic some portion of the robot’smotion. For instance, if the robot moved its head up and down in ayes motion, subjects often copied the gesture in time with it. They alsocopied the extension and withdrawal of the head and its motion patterns.When a subject first engaged with the robot, s/he usually did so in one oftwo ways. The active subject stood in front of the robot and did somethingthat might attract attention (made a face, waved, said something).The passive subject stood still until the robot acknowledged the subject’s