12.07.2015 Views

Joint Doctrine for Amphibious Operations - Historic Naval Ships ...

Joint Doctrine for Amphibious Operations - Historic Naval Ships ...

Joint Doctrine for Amphibious Operations - Historic Naval Ships ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter IIdesignated in the order initiating planning <strong>for</strong>the amphibious operation are coequal. Alldecisions made by these commanders arereached based on a common understandingof the mission, objectives, and procedures andon a free exchange of in<strong>for</strong>mation. Unlesspublished in the order initiating theamphibious operation, the CATF and CLFwill identify the events and conditions <strong>for</strong> anyshifts of the support relationship throughoutthe operation during the planning phase and<strong>for</strong>ward them to the establishing authority <strong>for</strong>approval. The establishing authority willresolve any differences among thecommanders.c. Supported Commander. A supportedcommander may be designated <strong>for</strong> the entireoperation, a particular phase or stage of theoperation, a particular function, or acombination of phases, stages, events, andfunctions. Unless limited by the establishingdirective or the order initiating the amphibiousoperation, the supported commander hasthe authority to exercise general directionof the supporting ef<strong>for</strong>t. General directionincludes the designation and prioritization oftargets or objectives, timing and duration ofthe supporting action, and other instructionsnecessary <strong>for</strong> coordination and efficiency. Theestablishing authority is responsible <strong>for</strong>ensuring that the supported and supportingcommanders understand the degree ofauthority that the supported commander isgranted.• If not specified in the order initiating theamphibious operation, the CATF andCLF will determine who has primaryresponsibility <strong>for</strong> the essential tasksduring the mission analysis in theplanning process.See Chapter IV, “Approach to Planningand Primary Decisions,” <strong>for</strong> missionanalysis and the planning process.• In an operation of relatively shortduration, normally the establishingauthority will choose one commander <strong>for</strong>the entire operation. When there is nolittoral threat to the amphibious <strong>for</strong>ce (<strong>for</strong>example, in a particular NEO) theestablishing authority may designate theCLF as the supported commander <strong>for</strong> theentire operation. During the movementor transit phase, the CATF may bedesignated the supported commanderbased on having responsibility <strong>for</strong> themajor action or activity during that phase.The CATF may be designated thesupported commander based oncapabilities <strong>for</strong> airspace control and airdefense <strong>for</strong> the entire operation if, <strong>for</strong>example, the landing <strong>for</strong>ce does notintend to establish a tactical air commandcenter ashore (see Figure II-1).• The establishing authority shouldconsider several factors whendesignating the supported commander atvarious phases and events during theamphibious operation, including butlimited to the following.•• Responsibility <strong>for</strong> the preponderanceof the mission.•• Force capabilities.•• Threat.•• Type, phase, and duration ofoperation.•• C2 capabilities.•• Battlespace assigned.•• Recommendations from subordinatecommanders.II-6JP 3-02

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!