12.07.2015 Views

Joint Doctrine for Amphibious Operations - Historic Naval Ships ...

Joint Doctrine for Amphibious Operations - Historic Naval Ships ...

Joint Doctrine for Amphibious Operations - Historic Naval Ships ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER IVAPPROACH TO PLANNING AND PRIMARY DECISIONS“Gallipoli was a tragedy <strong>for</strong> the Allies in World War I, but it was a failure inexecution — not in concept. The lessons drawn from this campaign providedthe framework <strong>for</strong> modern amphibious doctrine, which later would help theMarines defeat the Japanese in the Pacific. Everything is good <strong>for</strong> something— if only to serve as a horrible example.”From Gallipoli and the Role of Intelligence<strong>Naval</strong> Institute ProceedingsJune 19951. GeneralThis chapter provides general guidance onthe amphibious planning process. The processis designed <strong>for</strong> use by any size amphibious<strong>for</strong>ce, to conduct any operation, and facilitatescommanders making the ten primary decisionsrequired in most amphibious operations,discussed later in this chapter. The process isbased on joint and Service models. It provideslogical procedures to follow from the receiptof an order initiating the amphibious operationthrough the amphibious <strong>for</strong>ce commanders’development of operation plans (OPLANs),OPORDs, operation general matters(OPGENs), or operation tasks (OPTASKs).For more in<strong>for</strong>mation on joint planningmodels, see JP 5-00.2, <strong>Joint</strong> Task ForcePlanning Guidance and Procedures. ChaptersV through X of this publication provideguidance on functional area planningconsiderations.The amphibious planning process is capableof Service component interface with the jointdeliberate planning process during thesupporting plan development phase or Serviceor functional component interface during thecrisis action planning (CAP) process,beginning in the situation development phaseand continuing throughout the CAP process.The focus of the planning process is to linkthe employment of the amphibious <strong>for</strong>ceto the attainment of strategic and/oroperational objectives through the design,organization, integration, and conduct ofthe amphibious operation within the JFC’soverall campaign.2. Tenets of <strong>Amphibious</strong>PlanningPlanning <strong>for</strong> an amphibious operation iscontinuous, from the receipt of the orderinitiating the amphibious operation throughthe termination of the operation. The tenetsof successful amphibious planning are topdownplanning, unity of ef<strong>for</strong>t (within thedesignated operational area), and anintegrated planning ef<strong>for</strong>t.a. Top-Down Planning. Planning is afundamental responsibility of commanders.The complexity of amphibious operationsrequires amphibious <strong>for</strong>ce commanders todrive the planning process. Their guidanceand intent are central to planning and mustbe translated into a design <strong>for</strong> actionby subordinates. Their decisions (e.g.,amphibious <strong>for</strong>ce objectives, amphibious<strong>for</strong>ce CONOPS, landing beaches, commanders’critical in<strong>for</strong>mation requirements, andpromulgated essential elements of friendlyin<strong>for</strong>mation) during the planning process arerequired be<strong>for</strong>e additional steps in the processcan proceed.b. Unity of Ef<strong>for</strong>t. Unity of ef<strong>for</strong>t in theoperational area allows the amphibious <strong>for</strong>ceIV-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!