22927,397 prisoners house 10,194 persons, including 485 children. Some 80 percent ofprisoners are awaiting trial, mostly for petty offenses.Prisoners routinely are shackled. The principal of the institute for jail staff trainingin Lahore stated in a July 1999 press interview that fettering is the most convenientway to administer an overcrowded jail. While the Pakistan Prison Act of1894 permits fettering for a variety of offenses, the punishment usually is given foradministrative convenience, or to extract bribes from prisoners. The shackles usedare tight, heavy, and painful, and reportedly have led to gangrene and amputationin several cases. According to a press report, Shaheen Akhtar, a 15-year-old rapevictim charged with adultery under the Hudood Ordinances, was kept fettered ina hospital despite being diagnosed with advanced tuberculosis; Akhtar died in May(see Section 1.c.). Although the Sindh High Court ruled fettering illegal in 1993, thepractice continues, and visitors to Sindhi jails regularly see fettered prisoners. OnApril 21, General Musharraf condemned fettering as a ‘‘tool of indignity.’’ Followinga Lahore High Court ruling in June, prison wardens in Lahore were ordered to removefetters; however police personnel and prison administrators have resisted (seeSection 4).There are three classes (A, B, and C) of prison facilities. Class ‘‘C’’ cells generallyhold common criminals and those in pretrial detention. Such cells often have dirtfloors, no furnishings, and poor food. Prisoners in these cells reportedly suffer themost abuse, including beatings and forced kneeling for long periods of time. In 1998the Senate’s <strong>Committee</strong> on Human Rights reported that at one facility inHyderabad, 60 prisoners were confined to a space 100 feet by 30 feet with only 1latrine. Such unsanitary conditions are common in small, poorly ventilated, and decrepitcolonial-era prisons. Inadequate food, often consisting of only a few pieces ofbread, led to chronic malnutrition for those unable to supplement their diet withhelp from family or friends. Access to medical care is a problem. Mentally ill prisonersnormally lack adequate care and are not segregated from the general prisonpopulation (see Section 5). <strong>Foreign</strong> prisoners, mostly citizens of African countrieswith minimal diplomatic representation, often remain in prison long after their sentencesare completed because there is no one to pay for their deportation to theirhome country. Conditions in ‘‘A’’ and ‘‘B’’ cells are markedly better; prisoners inthese cells are permitted to have servants, special food, and televisions. Authoritiesreserve ‘‘A’’ cells for prominent persons, including political leaders. Especially prominentindividuals—including some political figures—sometimes are held under housearrest and permitted to receive visitors.In September prisoners in Hyderabad prison rioted to protest poor prison conditions.On September 25, police used force to quell a large prison riot; no casualtyfigures were reported. Prisoners also held riots over prison conditions in Peshawarin October and in Dera Islami Khan in December. There were reports that four prisonersdied in the Peshawar jail riot; however, prison authorities denied the reports.The Government permits prison visits by human rights monitors (see Section1.d.). Landlords in Sindh and political factions in Karachi operated private jails (seeSection 1.d.).d. Arbitrary Arrest, Detention, or Exile.—The law regulates arrest and detentionprocedures; however, the authorities do not always comply with the law and policearbitrarily arrested and detained citizens. The law permits the Deputy Commissioner(DC) of a local district to order detention without charge for 30 days of personssuspected of threatening public order and safety. The DC may renew detentionin 30-day increments, up to a total of 90 days. Human rights monitors report instancesin which prisoners jailed under the Maintenance of Public Order Act havebeen imprisoned for up to 6 months without charge. For other criminal offenses, policemay hold a suspect for 24 hours without charge. After the prisoner appears beforea magistrate, the court can grant permission for continued detention for a maximumperiod of 14 days if the police provide material proof that this is necessaryfor an investigation. The Musharraf regime created the National Accountability Bureau(NAB) and special accountability courts to try corruption cases; the NationalAccountability Ordinance allows those suspected of corrupt practices to be detainedfor 90 days without charge (see Section 1.e.).Police may arrest individuals on the basis of a First Incident Report (FIR) filedby a complainant, and have been known to file FIR’s without supporting evidence.FIR’s frequently are used to harass or intimidate individuals. Charges against anindividual also may be based on a ‘‘blind’’ FIR, which lists the perpetrators as ‘‘personor persons unknown.’’ If the case is not solved, the FIR is placed in the inactivefile. When needed, a FIR is reactivated and taken to a magistrate by the police; thepolice then name a suspect and ask that the suspect be remanded for 14 days whilethey investigate further. After 14 days, the case is dropped for lack of evidence, butVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00136 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.036 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
2293then another FIR is activated and brought against the accused. In this manner, rollingcharges can be used to hold a suspect in custody continuously.If the police can provide material proof that detention (physical remand or policecustody for the purpose of interrogation) is necessary for an investigation, a courtmay extend detention for a total of 14 days. However, such proof may be little morethan unsubstantiated assertions by the police. In practice the authorities do notfully observe the limits on detention. Police are not required to notify anyone whenan arrest is made and often hold detainees without charge until a court challengesthem. The police sometimes detain individuals arbitrarily without charge or on falsecharges to extort payment for their release. In Karachi small squads of policestopped taxis and delivery trucks for bribes. Human rights monitors report that anumber of police stations have secret detention cells in which individuals are keptwhile police bargain for their release. There also are reports that the police moveprisoners from one police station to another if they suspect a surprise visit by higherauthorities. Some women continued to be detained arbitrarily and sexually abused(see Sections 1.c. and 5). Police also detained relatives of wanted criminals in orderto compel suspects to surrender (see Section 1.f.). Police personnel also have beenknown to detain persons as a result of personal vendettas. Following an Augusthouse robbery in a Christian neighborhood in Islamabad, police reportedly arrestedresidents of the neighborhood and extorted bribes from them in exchange for theirrelease.The law stipulates that detainees must be brought to trial within 30 days of theirarrest. However, in many cases, trials do not start until 6 months after the filingof charges. In 1998 the HRCP estimated that there were almost as many individualsawaiting trial in jails as there were prisoners. According to the chief justice of theLahore High Court, there were over 500,000 civil and criminal cases backlogged inthe province’s subordinate court system as of April 1999. In 1999 in 62 Lahore citycourts, 7,000 prisoners were awaiting trial in 6,000 cases; in 3,500 of these cases,the police have not even brought a ‘‘challan,’’ or indictment, to the court. Sindh Governmentofficials reported in February that 11,945 of the 14,219 prisoners in Sindhjails are awaiting trial. In 1997 the Government justified the creation of Anti-terroristcourts by citing the large number of murder and other cases that are cloggingthe regular court system (see Section 1.e.). The anti-terrorist courts reportedly sentenced32 persons to death and 15 persons to life imprisonment during the year.Double jeopardy applies to those convicted of possessing narcotics because of a 1990federal Shariat court ruling that customs and narcotics cases be initiated separately.A February ruling by the Lahore High Court forbidding a second trial was ignoredby an April sessions court decision in Lahore, which sent the accused back to prisonfor the second time on the same narcotics conviction.Asif Zardari, husband of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, has waited forover 3 years for the start of his trial on charges of killing his brother-in-law,Murtaza Bhutto. Charges were first filed against Zardari in 1997 and transferredsuccessively to two courts, where several judges refused to preside. By year’s end,only 2 of 223 witnesses have been heard. In April 1999, Zardari was tried and convictedseparately on corruption charges.The Government permits visits by human rights monitors, family members, andlawyers (see Section 1.c.). However, in some cases, authorities refuse family visitsand, in some police stations, persons are expected to pay bribes to see a prisoner.The Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) have a separate legal system, theFrontier Crimes Regulation, which recognizes the doctrine of collective responsibility.Authorities are empowered to detain fellow members of a fugitive’s tribe, orto blockade the fugitive’s village, pending his surrender or punishment by his owntribe in accordance with local tradition. The Government continued to exercise suchauthority during the year. In March two persons from Mullah Said village were arrestedunder the Frontier Crimes Regulation following a shooting incident in whichsome persons from this village fired on residents of the neighboring Badan village(see Section 1.f.).The Government sometimes uses mass arrests to quell protests or civil unrest. In1999 police personnel arrested hundreds of persons, including two prominent membersof the SSP, Maulana Muhammad Azam Tariq and Maulana MohammadAhmad Ludhianvi, following a wave of sectarian violence in Punjab and Sindh.Tariq and Ludhianvi were released during the year; however, Ludhianvi was killedin May by unknown assailants and Azam Tariq has taken refuge in Afghanistan(see Sections 1.a. and 5). Police arrested small businessmen during strikes in Mayand June; however, all of the demonstrators were released shortly after their arrests.On May 11, police arrested about 300 Muslim clerics and students in Lahoreduring protests against Musharraf’s proposed changes to the blasphemy laws (seeSections 2.b. and 2.c.). In September Lahore police arrested more than 500 activistsVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00137 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.036 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
- Page 7 and 8:
2163All factions probably hold poli
- Page 9 and 10:
2165and unexploded ordnance. Nevert
- Page 11 and 12:
2167bade non-Muslims from living in
- Page 13 and 14:
2169tion of most of the country. Go
- Page 15 and 16:
2171Women accused of adultery also
- Page 17 and 18:
2173violations of the rights to edu
- Page 19 and 20:
2175paper and firewood, shining sho
- Page 21 and 22:
2177ister made remarks implying tha
- Page 23 and 24:
2179central unit of its student win
- Page 25 and 26:
2181humiliating, painful punishment
- Page 27 and 28:
2183ment of the split verdict in th
- Page 29 and 30:
2185The court system has two levels
- Page 31 and 32:
2187received death threats a few we
- Page 33 and 34:
2189ference, but on August 15 (the
- Page 35 and 36:
2191about 125 refugees and asylum s
- Page 37 and 38:
2193Section 5. Discrimination Based
- Page 39 and 40:
2195Indigenous People.—Tribal peo
- Page 41 and 42:
2197ers have the right to strike in
- Page 43 and 44:
2199sites, carry fruit, vegetables,
- Page 45 and 46:
2201based in the Department of Wome
- Page 47 and 48:
2203turn to the country, beat them,
- Page 49 and 50:
2205antinational crimes, including
- Page 51 and 52:
2207order to be eligible for nomina
- Page 53 and 54:
2209Children.—The Government has
- Page 55 and 56:
2211resentatives of the Nepalese Go
- Page 57 and 58:
2213east; continued detention throu
- Page 59 and 60:
2215Accountability remains a seriou
- Page 61 and 62:
2217The Disturbed Areas Act has bee
- Page 63 and 64:
2219lice courtyard in Punjab, appar
- Page 65 and 66:
2221the NLFT was retaliating for a
- Page 67 and 68:
2223The Ministry of Home Affairs re
- Page 69 and 70:
2225One of the suspects subsequentl
- Page 71 and 72:
2227human rights organization. The
- Page 73 and 74:
2229sions would seriously affect hu
- Page 75 and 76:
2231ment. There are effective chann
- Page 77 and 78:
2233three Border Security Force mem
- Page 79 and 80:
2235fice owned by an NGO at Konung
- Page 81 and 82:
2237nated, but many of its members
- Page 83 and 84:
2239ever, no further information wa
- Page 85 and 86: 2241The Tamil Nadu government provi
- Page 87 and 88: 2243According to HRW, on April 20,
- Page 89 and 90: 2245and branded her with hot iron r
- Page 91 and 92: 2247also concerned about the lack o
- Page 93 and 94: 2249rights of the mentally ill and
- Page 95 and 96: 2251from women and children, gather
- Page 97 and 98: 2253The burning of churches continu
- Page 99 and 100: 2255suspected of belonging to an up
- Page 101 and 102: 2257Bonded labor, the result of a p
- Page 103 and 104: 2259ment officials more aware of th
- Page 105 and 106: 2261and ‘‘inhuman treatment.’
- Page 107 and 108: 2263illustration of the consequence
- Page 109 and 110: 2265The Government has permitted pr
- Page 111 and 112: 2267lations governing Internet acce
- Page 113 and 114: 2269Women traditionally have played
- Page 115 and 116: 2271In 1997 the Government for the
- Page 117 and 118: 2273pali Congress Party flags. A bo
- Page 119 and 120: 2275The authorities are more likely
- Page 121 and 122: 2277of the monarch who allegedly ki
- Page 123 and 124: 2279the Government generally does n
- Page 125 and 126: 2281areas along the country’s bor
- Page 127 and 128: 2283groups. Nevertheless, converts
- Page 129 and 130: 2285e. Acceptable Conditions of Wor
- Page 131 and 132: 2287Provisional Constitutional Orde
- Page 133 and 134: 2289assailants killed a leader of t
- Page 135: 2291ditions, Sindh Inspector Genera
- Page 139 and 140: 2295Farooq Sattar was arrested by o
- Page 141 and 142: 2297case pending before any other s
- Page 143 and 144: 2299The Hudood ordinances criminali
- Page 145 and 146: 2301The Penal Code mandates the dea
- Page 147 and 148: 2303cast on television; however, so
- Page 149 and 150: 2305which stipulated a sentence of
- Page 151 and 152: 2307ties at times prevent political
- Page 153 and 154: 2309fair. Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
- Page 155 and 156: 2311sioners review blasphemy cases
- Page 157 and 158: 2313of Shari’a (see Section 1.c.)
- Page 159 and 160: 2315late head of the Board of Inter
- Page 161 and 162: 2317Courts also may order that chil
- Page 163 and 164: 2319portedly spared the two Muslim
- Page 165 and 166: 2321these services to a few core ar
- Page 167 and 168: 2323centers and 146 larger centers
- Page 169 and 170: 2325administration in Multan approa
- Page 171 and 172: 2327fore their mandates expired, se
- Page 173 and 174: 2329moved many detainees to another
- Page 175 and 176: 2331during the year and in previous
- Page 177 and 178: 2333The LTTE was responsible for a
- Page 179 and 180: 2335persons tried on criminal charg
- Page 181 and 182: 2337the other by the LTTE. The bord
- Page 183 and 184: 2339thor, remained subject to gover
- Page 185 and 186: 2341bombs exploded in the hall of t
- Page 187 and 188:
2343September 29, the Center for Mo
- Page 189 and 190:
2345a strong commitment to children
- Page 191 and 192:
2347All workers, other than civil s
- Page 193:
23491999, the LTTE began a program