2218complying with this directive. However, the NHRC has no authority to investigatedirectly abuses by the security forces, and security forces therefore are not requiredto—and do notreport custodial deaths in Jammu and Kashmir or the northeasternstates. In August the NHRC ordered an investigation into the death in police custodyof Rajan Singh in September 1995 in Agra district jail. Police stated thatSingh, who was being transported to court for trial in a police truck, died of injuriessustained when he jumped from the vehicle in an effort to escape. The autopsy revealedthat Singh had undergone shock and hemorrhaging prior to his death. TheNHRC found that the postmortem results were inconsistent with the police explanationof the death and believed that the claim of Singh’s attempted escape fromcustody was fabricated and that a more likely explanation was that Singh ‘‘couldhave been subjected to severe beating in the police vehicle.’’ The NHRC orderedUttar Pradesh state to pay $10,990 (500,000 rupees) in compensation to Singh’snext of kin and recommended disciplinary action against the police officers involvedin the incident. Also in August, the NHRC directed the Karnataka government topay compensation of $4,395 (200,000 rupees) to the family of Thimmaiah, who diedin the Mulbagal police station, Kolar district, Karnataka. The police maintain thatThimmaiah hanged himself in his cell; however, the postmortem and inquest reportsforwarded by the Karnataka government do not substantiate this claim. The Commissionconcluded that the death ‘‘had been caused by police,’’ and ordered the governmentof Karnataka to bring charges against the police officers involved in theincident.According to the PUCL, on February 17, Nathan died in police custody inChennai. Police assert that they arrested Nathan on February 16 on suspicion oftheft and that he confessed to that crime in court the same day. They further maintainthat Nathan complained of diarrhea and vomiting the following morning; helater was taken to a nearby hospital and declared dead. However, the PUCL allegesthat Nathan actually was arrested on February 10, 6 days before the recorded arrest,and that police tortured him to death in an effort to recover stolen money. TheTamil Nadu government initiated an official inquiry into the death and suspendedsix police personnel, including an inspector, after the incident. Amnesty Internationaland Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported that on April 20, police in Gujaratbeat to death Colonel Pratap Save, an activist with the Kinara Bachao Samiti(Save the Coast <strong>Committee</strong>), which was protesting the construction of a port in Gujarat.Members of the State Reserve Police allegedly arrested 46 demonstrators, includingSave, following the protest, and beat 6 of them at a local police station (seeSection 1.c.). Save suffered a brain hemorrhage and died at a hospital in Mumbai.All of the other protesters were released on bail within 48 hours. The Karnatakabranch of the PUCL alleged that police in Moodabidri town, Mangalore district,Karnataka, were responsible for the custodial death of Sudath Kumar Jain, a40year-old local film projectionist. The human rights group alleges that police tookJain from his home for questioning shortly after midnight on May 30. Two hourslater, his relatives were informed that he had been admitted to a hospital; his relativesfound Jain unconscious and bleeding from his mouth. Jain was transferredto a second hospital late that morning where he died 3 hours later. The PUCL concludedthat police had tortured Jain to death (see Section 1.c.). After the investigationresults, the superintendent of police, South Kanara district, filed a criminalcase against the arresting officer.Human rights groups allege that police in Adilabad district, Andhra Pradesh torturedand then hanged Chandraiah, an unarmed suspected Naxalite, on June 10.Angry villagers forced one of the police officials to confess to the hanging. Based onhis confession, human rights activists filed a formal complaint with the NHRC. TheNHRC has directed the Andhra Pradesh government to investigate. The PUCL reportedthat Krishna Pada Seal, his wife, and his son were imprisoned in Sakchi Jail,Jamshedpur, Bihar on July 25. According to the PUCL, prison officials torturedthem, allegedly because they intended to extort money from the family (see Section1.c.). Seal and his family were granted bail on August 4, following the intercessionof the PUCL. On his release, Seal could not walk, and died as he was being carriedto a waiting car. According to credible reports, on August 3, Lalrinchana, a 25-yearoldChin refugee, died from torture in the Mizoram Aizawl central prison. Reportedly,village defense persons first arrested and tortured Lalrinchana, and thenturned him over to the Mizoram police (see Section 2.d.). In August the KarnatakaHigh Court convicted eight police officers who served in Nanjangud Police Stationin Karnataka in 1996 for fabricating official records following a custodial death. TheKarnataka police oversaw the entire investigation and presentation of evidence.In its 2000 annual report, Amnesty International expressed concern about the torturedeath of 21-year-old Devinder Singh. On September 18, 1999, police beatDevinder Singh, Sapinder Singh, and Karnail Singh (three Sikh brothers), in a po-VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
2219lice courtyard in Punjab, apparently to exact a confession from them that they possessedan assault rifle. Allegedly, police pulled their legs open 180 degrees, appliedgasoline to their genitals, and beat them badly. Devinder Singh died as result ofhis injuries. A police subinspector subsequently was charged with Devinder Singh’smurder.An army major was arrested in 1998 for the 1996 killing of human rights monitorJalil Andrabi. The case still was being heard at year’s end, but human rights workersalleged that the central Government and Jammu and Kashmir state both wereattempting to subvert the judicial process by withholding evidence, and that therewere no court actions during the year. There were no developments in the 1996 killingof human rights monitor Parag Kumar Das, who allegedly was killed by a militantwho previously had surrendered and was supported by the Government (seeSection 4).Killings and abductions of suspected militants and other persons byprogovernment countermilitants continued to be a significant problem in Jammuand Kashmir. Countermilitants are former separatist militants who have surrenderedto government forces, but who have retained their weapons and paramilitaryorganization. Government agencies fund, exchange intelligence with, and direct operationsof countermilitants as part of the counterinsurgency effort.Countermilitants are known to search persons at roadblocks (see Section 2.d.) andguard extensive areas of the Kashmir Valley from attacks by militants. The Government,through its sponsoring and condoning of extrajudicial countermilitant activities,is responsible for killings, abductions, and other abuses committed by thesemilitant groups. Perhaps as many as 3,000 individuals continue to operate inJammu and Kashmir, particularly in the countryside, outside major towns. TheHizbul Mujahideen, a Kashmiri militant group, stated in June 1998 thatprogovernment countermilitants had killed 350 of its members. According to Pakistaninewspaper accounts, Indian security forces had killed 438 Pakistani membersof insurgent groups in Jammu and Kashmir during 1999. Of this number, 200 weremembers of the LashkareTayyaba, 123 were members of the Al-Badr Mujahideen,69 were members of the Harkat-Ul-Mujahideenand, and 46 were members of theHizbul Mujahideen. However, these numbers have not been confirmed, and only includethe four largest militant groups in the state. The Government stated that securityforces had killed 1,520 militants in the state during the year, compared with1,082 in 1999. The Government recruited countermilitants into the Special OperationsGroup of the Jammu and Kashmir police and into the Border Security Force.Militant groups in Jammu and Kashmir increasingly targeted members of the securityforces and civilians during the year. In January militants allegedly killed twosoldiers in Jammu and Kashmir; the soldiers retaliated with arson. On February28, militants killed five Hindu truck drivers on the SrinagarJammu Highway (seeSection 5). According to HRW, in February militants allegedly shot and killed threepolice officers in the busy market area of Lal Chowk, Srinagar; security forces retaliatedby beating nearby civilians with sticks and rifle butts and by burning cars inSrinagar (see Section 1.c.). On March 20, militants massacred 35 Sikh inhabitantsof Chatisinghpura town, Anantnag district, Jammu and Kashmir, in what appearedto be a well-planned attack. The militants, dressed in military uniforms, separatedunarmed male members of the Sikh families from women and children, gathered themen in a school complex a short distance from their homes, and summarily executedthem. It was the first known attack on the Sikh minority in Jammu and Kashmirby militants, and it appeared intended to drive other members of that communityfrom the Muslim-majority state (see Section 5).On March 24, militants invaded a Muslim family’s home and killed five familymembers in Kot Budhan village, Udhampur district. The militants stormed into thehouse in the early morning, beat family members, and then shot them at pointblankrange; three other family members, including a child, were wounded in theattack. According to HRW, on April 17, gunmen entered the homes of several Hindufamilies in Kot Dara village, near Rajouri. They fired on the unarmed civilians, killingsix persons and injuring six others (see Section 5). On August 1 and 2, militantslaunched 8 separate and coordinated attacks in Jammu and Kashmir, killing approximately99 persons. In one of the attacks, at Pahalgam, armed militants descendedon a camp of Hindu religious pilgrims making the annual pilgrimage toAmarnat, in the northern part of the state. The militants fired automatic weaponsat the pilgrims’ tents, the unarmed civilians in the camp, their local porters andguides, and nearby army personnel, killing 32 persons, primarily unarmed civilians.Similar attacks throughout the night of August 1 to 2 appeared to have been intendedto halt the nascent effort of the Hizbul Mujahideen militant group and theGovernment to observe a ceasefire and initiate a dialog. An army-headed commissioninvestigated the August 1 Phalagam massacre and reported on October 31, thatVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
- Page 7 and 8:
2163All factions probably hold poli
- Page 9 and 10:
2165and unexploded ordnance. Nevert
- Page 11 and 12: 2167bade non-Muslims from living in
- Page 13 and 14: 2169tion of most of the country. Go
- Page 15 and 16: 2171Women accused of adultery also
- Page 17 and 18: 2173violations of the rights to edu
- Page 19 and 20: 2175paper and firewood, shining sho
- Page 21 and 22: 2177ister made remarks implying tha
- Page 23 and 24: 2179central unit of its student win
- Page 25 and 26: 2181humiliating, painful punishment
- Page 27 and 28: 2183ment of the split verdict in th
- Page 29 and 30: 2185The court system has two levels
- Page 31 and 32: 2187received death threats a few we
- Page 33 and 34: 2189ference, but on August 15 (the
- Page 35 and 36: 2191about 125 refugees and asylum s
- Page 37 and 38: 2193Section 5. Discrimination Based
- Page 39 and 40: 2195Indigenous People.—Tribal peo
- Page 41 and 42: 2197ers have the right to strike in
- Page 43 and 44: 2199sites, carry fruit, vegetables,
- Page 45 and 46: 2201based in the Department of Wome
- Page 47 and 48: 2203turn to the country, beat them,
- Page 49 and 50: 2205antinational crimes, including
- Page 51 and 52: 2207order to be eligible for nomina
- Page 53 and 54: 2209Children.—The Government has
- Page 55 and 56: 2211resentatives of the Nepalese Go
- Page 57 and 58: 2213east; continued detention throu
- Page 59 and 60: 2215Accountability remains a seriou
- Page 61: 2217The Disturbed Areas Act has bee
- Page 65 and 66: 2221the NLFT was retaliating for a
- Page 67 and 68: 2223The Ministry of Home Affairs re
- Page 69 and 70: 2225One of the suspects subsequentl
- Page 71 and 72: 2227human rights organization. The
- Page 73 and 74: 2229sions would seriously affect hu
- Page 75 and 76: 2231ment. There are effective chann
- Page 77 and 78: 2233three Border Security Force mem
- Page 79 and 80: 2235fice owned by an NGO at Konung
- Page 81 and 82: 2237nated, but many of its members
- Page 83 and 84: 2239ever, no further information wa
- Page 85 and 86: 2241The Tamil Nadu government provi
- Page 87 and 88: 2243According to HRW, on April 20,
- Page 89 and 90: 2245and branded her with hot iron r
- Page 91 and 92: 2247also concerned about the lack o
- Page 93 and 94: 2249rights of the mentally ill and
- Page 95 and 96: 2251from women and children, gather
- Page 97 and 98: 2253The burning of churches continu
- Page 99 and 100: 2255suspected of belonging to an up
- Page 101 and 102: 2257Bonded labor, the result of a p
- Page 103 and 104: 2259ment officials more aware of th
- Page 105 and 106: 2261and ‘‘inhuman treatment.’
- Page 107 and 108: 2263illustration of the consequence
- Page 109 and 110: 2265The Government has permitted pr
- Page 111 and 112: 2267lations governing Internet acce
- Page 113 and 114:
2269Women traditionally have played
- Page 115 and 116:
2271In 1997 the Government for the
- Page 117 and 118:
2273pali Congress Party flags. A bo
- Page 119 and 120:
2275The authorities are more likely
- Page 121 and 122:
2277of the monarch who allegedly ki
- Page 123 and 124:
2279the Government generally does n
- Page 125 and 126:
2281areas along the country’s bor
- Page 127 and 128:
2283groups. Nevertheless, converts
- Page 129 and 130:
2285e. Acceptable Conditions of Wor
- Page 131 and 132:
2287Provisional Constitutional Orde
- Page 133 and 134:
2289assailants killed a leader of t
- Page 135 and 136:
2291ditions, Sindh Inspector Genera
- Page 137 and 138:
2293then another FIR is activated a
- Page 139 and 140:
2295Farooq Sattar was arrested by o
- Page 141 and 142:
2297case pending before any other s
- Page 143 and 144:
2299The Hudood ordinances criminali
- Page 145 and 146:
2301The Penal Code mandates the dea
- Page 147 and 148:
2303cast on television; however, so
- Page 149 and 150:
2305which stipulated a sentence of
- Page 151 and 152:
2307ties at times prevent political
- Page 153 and 154:
2309fair. Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
- Page 155 and 156:
2311sioners review blasphemy cases
- Page 157 and 158:
2313of Shari’a (see Section 1.c.)
- Page 159 and 160:
2315late head of the Board of Inter
- Page 161 and 162:
2317Courts also may order that chil
- Page 163 and 164:
2319portedly spared the two Muslim
- Page 165 and 166:
2321these services to a few core ar
- Page 167 and 168:
2323centers and 146 larger centers
- Page 169 and 170:
2325administration in Multan approa
- Page 171 and 172:
2327fore their mandates expired, se
- Page 173 and 174:
2329moved many detainees to another
- Page 175 and 176:
2331during the year and in previous
- Page 177 and 178:
2333The LTTE was responsible for a
- Page 179 and 180:
2335persons tried on criminal charg
- Page 181 and 182:
2337the other by the LTTE. The bord
- Page 183 and 184:
2339thor, remained subject to gover
- Page 185 and 186:
2341bombs exploded in the hall of t
- Page 187 and 188:
2343September 29, the Center for Mo
- Page 189 and 190:
2345a strong commitment to children
- Page 191 and 192:
2347All workers, other than civil s
- Page 193:
23491999, the LTTE began a program