2250Such violations led to numerous tribal movements demanding the protection ofland and property rights. The Jharkhand Movement in Bihar and Orissa, and theBodo Movement in Assam, reflect deep economic and social grievances among indigenouspeople. In the Jharkhand area, tribal people complain that they have beenrelegated to unskilled mining jobs, have lost their forests to industrial construction,and have been displaced by development projects. During the year, the Governmentintroduced and Parliament passed legislation creating new, largely tribal-populatedstates from the Jharkand area of Bihar and the Chhatisgarh region of MadhyaPradesh. The Chhatisgarh State came into existence on November 1 and theJharkhand State came into existence on November 15.There also is some local autonomy in the northeast. In Meghalaya tribal chiefsstill wield influence in certain villages. The Nagaland government controls therights to certain mineral resources, and autonomous district councils in Tripura,Assam, and Meghalaya control matters such as education, rural development, andforestry in cooperation with the state governors.Religious Minorities.—The potential for renewed Hindu-Muslim violence remainsconsiderable and both sides committed human rights abuses during the year. Hindusand Muslims continue to feud over the construction of mosques several centuriesago on three sites where Hindus believe that temples stood previously. In1998 the Sri Krishna Commission, established by the Government to inquire intothe cause of Hindu-Muslim riots in Mumbai in December 1992 and January 1993,released its report (see Section 2.c.). The riots, which followed the destruction of anhistoric mosque in Ayodhya in December 1992, left more than 1,000 persons, mostlyMuslims, dead. Maharashtra’s BJP-Shiv Sena ruling coalition rejected the report,which laid responsibility for much of the violence on leaders from both parties. Thatgovernment fell and was replaced by a Congress Partyled government, which submittedan affidavit to the Supreme Court in August promising to implement theCommission’s recommendations. The same government established a special taskforce to implement the recommendations of the Sri Krishna Commission report. Therecommendations included prosecuting the 31 police officials and several Shiv Sena,BJP, and Congress Party politicians found to have abetted the anti-Muslim riotingin Mumbai in 1993.On January 30, Muslim and Hindu crowds in Bangalore clashed and threw stonesat each other after an idol was desecrated in a Hindu temple. Two persons wereinjured in Hindu-Muslim clashes in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, from August 5 to 7.Human rights groups allege that following the riots, the state reserve police officersforced some Muslim residents of the city to sing the Sanskrit anthem ‘‘VandeMataram’’ to prove that they were not ‘‘anti-national’’ (see Section 2.c.). On August31, several hundred angry Hindus pelted Muslim houses with stones and tried toset fire to several homes after a Muslim eloped with a Hindu in a town in Vadodaradistrict, Gujarat. On September 12, Muslim-Hindu violence in Nanded, a city 300miles southeast of Mumbai, left approximately 60 persons injured. The attacksoccured during the annual Ganesh festival when a procession of Hindus passed bya mosque. According to some reports, Muslims in the mosque threw stones at Hinduworshippers whom they claim offended the mosque by making too much noise. TheMaharasthra government ordered a judicial inquiry. On October 16, a gang enteredTahira village, Siwan district, Bihar, and murdered five members of a Muslim family.Police suspect unknown persons in nearby Mohajirpur village committed thekillings in retaliation for the killings of Hindu villagers a few days earlier. On December3, a group of men in Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, attacked and killed a Muslimpreacher with crude bombs and sickles. No one was convicted in connection with theAugust 26, 1999 mob mutilation and burning to death of a Muslim cattle trader inPadiabeda village, Orissa; about 400 persons witnessed the killing.Attacks by Muslim militants seeking to end Indian rule in Jammu and Kashmir,and contining political violence, has driven almost 95 percent of Hindus in theKashmir valley (Pandits) to seek refuge in camps in Jammu, with relatives in NewDelhi, or elsewhere, during the last few years. Throughout the year, militants carriedout several execution-style mass killings of Hindu villagers and violently targetedPandits, and in one instance the Sikh minority, in Jammu and Kashmir (seeSections 1.a. and 1.g.). On February 28, militants killed five truck drivers on theSrinagar-Jammu highway. The militants systematically halted commercial truckstraveling along the route and questioned the unarmed drivers and cleaners onboard. Those persons identified as Hindus were taken out of the trucks and shot.On March 20, 17 unidentified gunmen in army uniforms killed 35 Sikh men inChati Singhpura (near Anantang in south Kashmir). The incident was the largestsingle massacre of civilians during the past 11 years of militancy, and at year’s end,the only mass killing in Kashmir to have involved the Sikh community. Accordingto various reports, militants separated unarmed male members of the Sikh familiesVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
2251from women and children, gathered the men a short distance from their homes, andkilled them with automatic weapon fire. It was the first known attack on the Sikhminority in Jammu and Kashmir (see Section 1.a.). On March 25, security forcesshot and killed five men, alleging that they had been responsible for the March 20massacre. According to HRW, on April 17, gunmen entered the homes of severalHindu families in Kot Dara village, near Rajouri. They fired on unarmed civilians,killing six persons and injuring six others. On July 13, militants killed three Buddhistmonks in Rangdum, Kargil district. On July 30, militants hurled a grenadeinto a jeep carrying Hindu religious pilgrims near Gulmarg, killing one person andinjuring five others. On August 1 to 2, militants entered a camp of Hindus makingthe annual pilgrimage to Amarnath in the northern part of the state and fired automaticweapons at tents, the unarmed civilians in the camp, the pilgrims’ local portersand guides, and army personnel nearby. A total of 32 persons were killed inthe attack, all of them unarmed civilians. Similar attacks occurred throughout thenight of August 1 to 2, killing some 100 persons in various places in Jammu andKashmir (see Section 1.a.). On August 17, militants reportedly killed six Hindu villagersand seriously wounded seven others in Jammu (see Section 1.a.). On August18, militants entered a Hindu village in the Koteswara area near Rajauri and indiscriminatelyfired at villagers, killing four persons and injuring six others. On August18, militants killed three elderly men and a teenage boy, and wounded twoother persons when they fired automatic guns at civilians in Ind village, Udhampur.On August 20, a person shot and injured a Hindu telephone kiosk operator in QaziGund, near Anantnag. Also on August 20, militants entered the Hindu village ofIndeh, Udampur district and killed four members of a Hindu family (see Sections1.a. and 2.c.).According to the Ministry of Home <strong>Affairs</strong>, about 51,000 Pandit families fled theirhomes in Jammu and Kashmir due to the violence. Of these, 4,674 families are livingin refugee camps in Jammu, 235 families are in camps in Delhi, and 18 familiesare in Chandigarh. The rest still are displaced, but are living on the economy inJammu and Delhi. The Pandit community criticizes bleak physical, educational, andeconomic conditions in the camps and fears that a negotiated solution giving greaterautonomy to the Muslim majority might threaten its own survival in Jammu andKashmir as a culturally and historically distinctive group. On August 18, theJammu and Kashmir government adopted a proposal designed to facilitate the returnof Pandits to the Kashmir valley and rehabilitation of the Pandits. However,various Pandit groups criticized the proposal for failing to address the political aspirationsof Pandits, failing to provide economic guarantees, failing to provide adequatesecurity for returning Pandits, and creating special economic zones that wouldaggravate communal tensions. The proposal abandoned during the year. The NHRCreleased a 39-page report in June 1999, in response to a petition from HinduPandits alleging that genocide had been committed against them. The NHRC foundthat the crimes against the Pandits ‘‘fall short of the ultimate crime: Genocide,’’ butstated that compensation to the community had been inadequate. As a result, theGovernment’s monthly subsistence payment to Pandit families was increased.There were numerous attacks against Christian communities and Christian missionariesduring the year. In August the SAHRDC stated that there had been 57such attacks during the first 7 months of the year. The SAHRDC stated the attackshad taken three forms: Attacks on priests and nuns; attacks on evangelists and disruptionof prayer meetings; and attacks on churches, hospitals, and other charitableinstitutions. Attacks occurred in Tamil Nadu, Goa, Punjab, Karnataka, AndhraPradesh, Gujarat, Haryana, Orissa, West Bengal, Bihar, Maharashtra, MadhyaPradesh, and Uttar Pradesh. There were a series of incidents in Uttar Pradesh inApril. On April 6, an angry mob, demanding a decrease in school fees and an increasein the number of passing students, harassed the principal of Sacred Heartschool in Mathura. The principal disputed an allegation that the harassment wasbecause of school fees, saying that she was harassed and chased by a group of youngmen (not parents of students) who also asked her questions about the religious textsread at the school. On April 10, Father Joseph Dabre, principal of St. Dominic’sschool in Mathura, was beaten by six young men who went to the school on the pretextof inquiring about admissions. On April 11, in Kosi Kalan near Mathura, 8 to10 assailants attacked Father K.K. Thomas at St. Theresa’s school when he rushedto the assistance of a servant girl and 3 nuns whom the assailants were attacking.Thomas was injured seriously; his attackers had not been found by year’s end.Prime Minister A.B. Vajpayee asked Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Ram PrakashGupta for a detailed report on the incidents in the Mathura area. State officials alsoordered police to monitor closely churches, missionary centers, and other places ofworship after the attacks near Mathura. On April 26, the NCM visited the sites ofthe attacks at Sacred Heart school, St. Dominic’s school, and St. Theresa’s school,VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
- Page 7 and 8:
2163All factions probably hold poli
- Page 9 and 10:
2165and unexploded ordnance. Nevert
- Page 11 and 12:
2167bade non-Muslims from living in
- Page 13 and 14:
2169tion of most of the country. Go
- Page 15 and 16:
2171Women accused of adultery also
- Page 17 and 18:
2173violations of the rights to edu
- Page 19 and 20:
2175paper and firewood, shining sho
- Page 21 and 22:
2177ister made remarks implying tha
- Page 23 and 24:
2179central unit of its student win
- Page 25 and 26:
2181humiliating, painful punishment
- Page 27 and 28:
2183ment of the split verdict in th
- Page 29 and 30:
2185The court system has two levels
- Page 31 and 32:
2187received death threats a few we
- Page 33 and 34:
2189ference, but on August 15 (the
- Page 35 and 36:
2191about 125 refugees and asylum s
- Page 37 and 38:
2193Section 5. Discrimination Based
- Page 39 and 40:
2195Indigenous People.—Tribal peo
- Page 41 and 42:
2197ers have the right to strike in
- Page 43 and 44: 2199sites, carry fruit, vegetables,
- Page 45 and 46: 2201based in the Department of Wome
- Page 47 and 48: 2203turn to the country, beat them,
- Page 49 and 50: 2205antinational crimes, including
- Page 51 and 52: 2207order to be eligible for nomina
- Page 53 and 54: 2209Children.—The Government has
- Page 55 and 56: 2211resentatives of the Nepalese Go
- Page 57 and 58: 2213east; continued detention throu
- Page 59 and 60: 2215Accountability remains a seriou
- Page 61 and 62: 2217The Disturbed Areas Act has bee
- Page 63 and 64: 2219lice courtyard in Punjab, appar
- Page 65 and 66: 2221the NLFT was retaliating for a
- Page 67 and 68: 2223The Ministry of Home Affairs re
- Page 69 and 70: 2225One of the suspects subsequentl
- Page 71 and 72: 2227human rights organization. The
- Page 73 and 74: 2229sions would seriously affect hu
- Page 75 and 76: 2231ment. There are effective chann
- Page 77 and 78: 2233three Border Security Force mem
- Page 79 and 80: 2235fice owned by an NGO at Konung
- Page 81 and 82: 2237nated, but many of its members
- Page 83 and 84: 2239ever, no further information wa
- Page 85 and 86: 2241The Tamil Nadu government provi
- Page 87 and 88: 2243According to HRW, on April 20,
- Page 89 and 90: 2245and branded her with hot iron r
- Page 91 and 92: 2247also concerned about the lack o
- Page 93: 2249rights of the mentally ill and
- Page 97 and 98: 2253The burning of churches continu
- Page 99 and 100: 2255suspected of belonging to an up
- Page 101 and 102: 2257Bonded labor, the result of a p
- Page 103 and 104: 2259ment officials more aware of th
- Page 105 and 106: 2261and ‘‘inhuman treatment.’
- Page 107 and 108: 2263illustration of the consequence
- Page 109 and 110: 2265The Government has permitted pr
- Page 111 and 112: 2267lations governing Internet acce
- Page 113 and 114: 2269Women traditionally have played
- Page 115 and 116: 2271In 1997 the Government for the
- Page 117 and 118: 2273pali Congress Party flags. A bo
- Page 119 and 120: 2275The authorities are more likely
- Page 121 and 122: 2277of the monarch who allegedly ki
- Page 123 and 124: 2279the Government generally does n
- Page 125 and 126: 2281areas along the country’s bor
- Page 127 and 128: 2283groups. Nevertheless, converts
- Page 129 and 130: 2285e. Acceptable Conditions of Wor
- Page 131 and 132: 2287Provisional Constitutional Orde
- Page 133 and 134: 2289assailants killed a leader of t
- Page 135 and 136: 2291ditions, Sindh Inspector Genera
- Page 137 and 138: 2293then another FIR is activated a
- Page 139 and 140: 2295Farooq Sattar was arrested by o
- Page 141 and 142: 2297case pending before any other s
- Page 143 and 144: 2299The Hudood ordinances criminali
- Page 145 and 146:
2301The Penal Code mandates the dea
- Page 147 and 148:
2303cast on television; however, so
- Page 149 and 150:
2305which stipulated a sentence of
- Page 151 and 152:
2307ties at times prevent political
- Page 153 and 154:
2309fair. Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
- Page 155 and 156:
2311sioners review blasphemy cases
- Page 157 and 158:
2313of Shari’a (see Section 1.c.)
- Page 159 and 160:
2315late head of the Board of Inter
- Page 161 and 162:
2317Courts also may order that chil
- Page 163 and 164:
2319portedly spared the two Muslim
- Page 165 and 166:
2321these services to a few core ar
- Page 167 and 168:
2323centers and 146 larger centers
- Page 169 and 170:
2325administration in Multan approa
- Page 171 and 172:
2327fore their mandates expired, se
- Page 173 and 174:
2329moved many detainees to another
- Page 175 and 176:
2331during the year and in previous
- Page 177 and 178:
2333The LTTE was responsible for a
- Page 179 and 180:
2335persons tried on criminal charg
- Page 181 and 182:
2337the other by the LTTE. The bord
- Page 183 and 184:
2339thor, remained subject to gover
- Page 185 and 186:
2341bombs exploded in the hall of t
- Page 187 and 188:
2343September 29, the Center for Mo
- Page 189 and 190:
2345a strong commitment to children
- Page 191 and 192:
2347All workers, other than civil s
- Page 193:
23491999, the LTTE began a program