2226confess to militant activity, to reveal information about suspected militants, or toinflict punishment for suspected support or sympathy with militants. Informationis not made public regarding instances of action taken against security force personnelin Jammu and Kashmir for acts of torture.In May the NHRC ordered the government of Jammu and Kashmir to pay $4,395(200,000 rupees) to the family of Ghulam Rasool, following its investigation intoRasool’s 1996 death while in police custody in Kathua, Jammu and Kashmir. Policearrested Rasool in Kathua on October 31, 1996. He was found dead in his cell thefollowing day. The autopsy showed that the cause of death was cardiorespiratory arrestarising from the dislocation of the spine. It also showed that Rasool had sufferedinjuries to his scalp, face, back, left eye, and both arms and legs. The NHRCconcluded that police had tortured Rasool to death. It further directed the Jammuand Kashmir government to initiate legal proceedings against the police officials responsible.Human rights monitors maintain that there is a similar pattern of securityforce abuses in the northeastern states. On July 28, members of the Assam Riflesarrested Khuraijam Pranam of Bishenpur, Manipur and allegedly tortured himfor 2 days before turning him over to local police. Pranam survived and underwenttreatment in Imphal Hospital. On August 18, the Guwahati High Court directed theManipur government to ensure that Pranam was not harmed in the hospital, andto allow family members to visit him. Police abuses against indigenous people includetorture (see Section 5).The U.N. Special Rapporteur on Torture noted in 1997 that methods of tortureincluded beating, rape, crushing the leg muscles with a wooden roller, burning withheated objects, and electric shocks. Because many alleged torture victims die in custody,and others are afraid to speak out, there are few firsthand accounts, althoughmarks of torture often have been found on the bodies of deceased detainees. TheU.N. Special Rapporteurs on Torture and on Extrajudicial Killings renewed their requeststo visit the country during the year, but the Government did not permit themto do so (see Section 4).The prevalence of torture by police in detention facilities throughout the countryis supported by the number of cases of deaths in police custody (see Section 1.a.).Delhi’s Tihar jail is notorious for the mistreatment of prisoners, with 1 of every 11custodial deaths occurring there. Police and jailers typically assault new prisonersfor money and personal articles. In addition police commonly torture detainees duringcustodial interrogation. Although police officers are subject to prosecution forsuch offenses under Section 302 of the Penal Code, the Government often fails tohold them accountable. On April 20, police in Gujarat allegedly beat to death ColonelPratap Save in a local police station (see Section 1.a.). The PUCL reported thatpolice tortured to death Sudath Kumar in Moodabidri police station, Karnataka, onMay 30 to 31 (see Section 1.a.). Human rights groups allege that police in AndhraPradesh tortured and then hanged an unarmed suspected Naxalite, Chandraiah, onJune 10 (see Section 1.a.). On August 4, Krishna Pada Seal died, just after he andhis family were released from prison; according to the PUCL, prison officials torturedthem during detention (see Section 1.a.). The PUCL alleged that police inMangalore district, Karnataka, were responsible for the August 29 custodial deathof Sudath Kumar Jain, a 40yearold local film projectionist who died in a hospitalafter sustaining injuries (see Section 1.a.). During the year, Amnesty Internationalexpressed concern about the September 1999 torture death of 21-year-old DevinderSingh (see Section 1.a.).The U.N. Special Rapporteur on Torture stated in 1997 that, in Jammu and Kashmir,torture victims or their relatives reportedly have had difficulty in filing complaintsbecause local police were issued instructions not to open a case without permissionfrom higher authorities. In addition the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir)Special Powers Act provides that unless approval is obtained from the centralGovernment, no ‘‘prosecution, suit, or other legal proceeding shall be instituted . . .against any person in respect of anything done or purported to be done in exerciseof the powers of the act.’’ This provision allows the security forces to act with virtualimpunity.There also were incidents in which police beat journalists (see Section 2.a.), demonstrators(see Section 2.b.), and Muslim students (see Section 2.c.). Police also committedabuses against tribal people (see Section 5).The rape of persons in custody is part of the broader pattern of custodial abuse.Limits placed on the arrest, search, and police custody of women appear effectivelyto limit the frequency of rape in custody, although it does occur on occasion. Accordingto HRW, in February in Tamil Nadu, 12 women were detained illegally, tortured,and repeatedly sexually assaulted in custody, because of their ties to a suspectedrobber who had himself died in police custody. In addition to the 12 women,police detained and beat the young sons of suspected robbers, according to a localVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
2227human rights organization. The same organization reported that the victims declinedto press charges against the police. On September 3, Captain Ravinder SinghTwatir of the 12th Battalion, Rashtriya Rifles, was sentenced to 7 years of rigorousimprisonment and dismissed from the army for raping a girl in Naugam village,Doda district, Jammu and Kashmir on February 14. As of September no action hadbeen taken against an alleged accomplice in the rape, special police officer BharatBhusan. The NHRC received a report of only one case of custodial rape betweenApril 1997 and March 1998. The 24-hour reporting requirement applies to custodialrape as well as custodial death. However, the requirement does not apply to rapeby policemen outside police stations. NGO’s claim that rape by police, including custodialrape, is more common than NHRC figures indicate. Although evidence is lacking,a higher incidence of abuse appears credible, given other evidence of abusivebehavior by police and the likelihood that many rapes go unreported due to a senseof shame and a fear of retribution among victims.Human rights monitors allege that on July 19, central reserve police force personnelraped a tribal housewife in Lamdam village, Manipur. They allege that therape was committed in retaliation for an attack carried out on a CRPF patrol byPeople’s Liberation Army militants the previous day (see Section 1.g.).There is a pattern of rape by paramilitary personnel in Jammu and Kashmir andthe northeast as a means of instilling fear among noncombatants in insurgency-affectedareas (see Section 1.g.), but it is not included in NHRC statistics because itinvolves military forces.From April 1998 to March 1999, the NHRC received 1,297 complaints of custodialdeath (1,114 in judicial custody and 183 in police custody), no cases of custodialrape, and 2,252 complaints of other police abuses. By year’s end, the NHRC had notreleased the statistics of its actions against police during this time period. However,from April 1997 to March 1998, the NHRC received 1,012 complaints of custodialdeath (819 in judicial custody and 193 in police custody), 1 case of custodial rape,and 1,413 complaints of other police excesses. As a result of NHRC action duringthis earlier period, criminal prosecutions were brought against 43 persons; departmentalaction was taken against 60 officers, 51 of whom were placed under suspension;and monetary compensation in amounts ranging from $1,100 (50,000 rupees)to $2,100 (100,000 rupees) were recommended for payment in 20 cases.According to press reports, prison officials used prisoners as domestic servantsand sold female prisoners to brothels (see Sections 5, 6.c., and 6.f.).Police corruption undermines efforts to combat trafficking in women and children(see Section 6.f.).Security forces killed and injured numerous militant group members, many in socalledencounter deaths, particularly in Jammu and Kashmir and the northeasternstates (see Section 1.a.).Militant groups sometimes used automatic weapons, hand grenades, bombs, landmines,and other weapons in political violence in Jammu and Kashmir and thenortheastern states; numerous security forces and civilians were killed and injured.Religiously motivated violence led to a number of deaths and injuries as well asdamage to property (see Sections 1.a., 1.g., and 5).Some militant groups in the northeast have used rape as a tactic to terrorize thepopulace; however, no cases are known to have been reported during the year.Prison conditions are very poor. Prisons are severely overcrowded, and the provisionof food and medical care frequently is inadequate.Prisons operate above capacity because of thousands of prisoners awaiting hearings(see Section 1.d.). For example, in Bihar 80 percent of prisoners areunconvicted remand prisoners awaiting completion of their trials. Delhi’s Tihar jail,with a designed capacity of 3,300 persons, houses 9,000 prisoners. Birsa Munda jailin Ranchi, Bihar, designed to hold 364 persons, houses more than 1,800 male andfemale prisoners. In May the PUCL visited Sakchi jail, Jamshedpur, Bihar, followingcomplaints of abuse of prisoners. The human rights activists found that theprison, designed to hold 200 prisoners, housed 786 persons, of whom only 55 hadbeen convicted; the rest were at various stages of the judicial process. AmnestyInternational reported that overcrowding in Arthur jail, Mumbai, led to rioting onJune 19. Designed to hold 50 prisoners, Arthur jail has 180 inmates. Prison guardsreportedly attacked inmates with razors and wooden poles to quell rioting thaterupted following a fight between two prisoners. Forty inmates were injured in theincident. An August 3 report from Aizawl, Mizoram, stated that its central jail, designedto house 500 prisoners, had 846 inmates. The NHRC reported in Februaryon its November 1999 visits to jails in Guwahati and Shillong. In Guwahati thecommission found 780 inmates in a district jail designed to hold 507 (see Section1.d.). In Shillong the commission found 374 inmates in the central jail, which wasdesigned to hold 150 persons. One of the inmates was a 10- or 11-year-old girlVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
- Page 7 and 8:
2163All factions probably hold poli
- Page 9 and 10:
2165and unexploded ordnance. Nevert
- Page 11 and 12:
2167bade non-Muslims from living in
- Page 13 and 14:
2169tion of most of the country. Go
- Page 15 and 16:
2171Women accused of adultery also
- Page 17 and 18:
2173violations of the rights to edu
- Page 19 and 20: 2175paper and firewood, shining sho
- Page 21 and 22: 2177ister made remarks implying tha
- Page 23 and 24: 2179central unit of its student win
- Page 25 and 26: 2181humiliating, painful punishment
- Page 27 and 28: 2183ment of the split verdict in th
- Page 29 and 30: 2185The court system has two levels
- Page 31 and 32: 2187received death threats a few we
- Page 33 and 34: 2189ference, but on August 15 (the
- Page 35 and 36: 2191about 125 refugees and asylum s
- Page 37 and 38: 2193Section 5. Discrimination Based
- Page 39 and 40: 2195Indigenous People.—Tribal peo
- Page 41 and 42: 2197ers have the right to strike in
- Page 43 and 44: 2199sites, carry fruit, vegetables,
- Page 45 and 46: 2201based in the Department of Wome
- Page 47 and 48: 2203turn to the country, beat them,
- Page 49 and 50: 2205antinational crimes, including
- Page 51 and 52: 2207order to be eligible for nomina
- Page 53 and 54: 2209Children.—The Government has
- Page 55 and 56: 2211resentatives of the Nepalese Go
- Page 57 and 58: 2213east; continued detention throu
- Page 59 and 60: 2215Accountability remains a seriou
- Page 61 and 62: 2217The Disturbed Areas Act has bee
- Page 63 and 64: 2219lice courtyard in Punjab, appar
- Page 65 and 66: 2221the NLFT was retaliating for a
- Page 67 and 68: 2223The Ministry of Home Affairs re
- Page 69: 2225One of the suspects subsequentl
- Page 73 and 74: 2229sions would seriously affect hu
- Page 75 and 76: 2231ment. There are effective chann
- Page 77 and 78: 2233three Border Security Force mem
- Page 79 and 80: 2235fice owned by an NGO at Konung
- Page 81 and 82: 2237nated, but many of its members
- Page 83 and 84: 2239ever, no further information wa
- Page 85 and 86: 2241The Tamil Nadu government provi
- Page 87 and 88: 2243According to HRW, on April 20,
- Page 89 and 90: 2245and branded her with hot iron r
- Page 91 and 92: 2247also concerned about the lack o
- Page 93 and 94: 2249rights of the mentally ill and
- Page 95 and 96: 2251from women and children, gather
- Page 97 and 98: 2253The burning of churches continu
- Page 99 and 100: 2255suspected of belonging to an up
- Page 101 and 102: 2257Bonded labor, the result of a p
- Page 103 and 104: 2259ment officials more aware of th
- Page 105 and 106: 2261and ‘‘inhuman treatment.’
- Page 107 and 108: 2263illustration of the consequence
- Page 109 and 110: 2265The Government has permitted pr
- Page 111 and 112: 2267lations governing Internet acce
- Page 113 and 114: 2269Women traditionally have played
- Page 115 and 116: 2271In 1997 the Government for the
- Page 117 and 118: 2273pali Congress Party flags. A bo
- Page 119 and 120: 2275The authorities are more likely
- Page 121 and 122:
2277of the monarch who allegedly ki
- Page 123 and 124:
2279the Government generally does n
- Page 125 and 126:
2281areas along the country’s bor
- Page 127 and 128:
2283groups. Nevertheless, converts
- Page 129 and 130:
2285e. Acceptable Conditions of Wor
- Page 131 and 132:
2287Provisional Constitutional Orde
- Page 133 and 134:
2289assailants killed a leader of t
- Page 135 and 136:
2291ditions, Sindh Inspector Genera
- Page 137 and 138:
2293then another FIR is activated a
- Page 139 and 140:
2295Farooq Sattar was arrested by o
- Page 141 and 142:
2297case pending before any other s
- Page 143 and 144:
2299The Hudood ordinances criminali
- Page 145 and 146:
2301The Penal Code mandates the dea
- Page 147 and 148:
2303cast on television; however, so
- Page 149 and 150:
2305which stipulated a sentence of
- Page 151 and 152:
2307ties at times prevent political
- Page 153 and 154:
2309fair. Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
- Page 155 and 156:
2311sioners review blasphemy cases
- Page 157 and 158:
2313of Shari’a (see Section 1.c.)
- Page 159 and 160:
2315late head of the Board of Inter
- Page 161 and 162:
2317Courts also may order that chil
- Page 163 and 164:
2319portedly spared the two Muslim
- Page 165 and 166:
2321these services to a few core ar
- Page 167 and 168:
2323centers and 146 larger centers
- Page 169 and 170:
2325administration in Multan approa
- Page 171 and 172:
2327fore their mandates expired, se
- Page 173 and 174:
2329moved many detainees to another
- Page 175 and 176:
2331during the year and in previous
- Page 177 and 178:
2333The LTTE was responsible for a
- Page 179 and 180:
2335persons tried on criminal charg
- Page 181 and 182:
2337the other by the LTTE. The bord
- Page 183 and 184:
2339thor, remained subject to gover
- Page 185 and 186:
2341bombs exploded in the hall of t
- Page 187 and 188:
2343September 29, the Center for Mo
- Page 189 and 190:
2345a strong commitment to children
- Page 191 and 192:
2347All workers, other than civil s
- Page 193:
23491999, the LTTE began a program