2242in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, police killed 6 persons and injured 15 others when theyfired on a crowd of about 2,000 persons (see Section 1.a.). The crowd had rampagedthrough a Muslim-minority section of the city after reports that ballot boxes hadbeen tampered with in the city’s municipal corporation elections. In West Bengal,clashes between supporters of the Trinamul Congress Party and the CPI(M) left 71persons dead in the first 9 months of the year (see Section 1.g.). Voting irregularitiesin the West Bengal election—such as fraud, delaying tactics, and intimidation—werereported widely.Women are underrepresented in government and politics, although no legal impedimentshinder their participation in the political process. A large proportion ofwomen participates in voting throughout the country (with turnout rates slightlylower than those of men), and numerous women are represented in all major partiesin the national and state legislatures. There are 66 women among the 790 Membersof Parliament, including the Deputy Speaker of the upper house, and there are 8women in the 74-member Cabinet. The 1993 passage of the ‘‘Panchayati Raj’’ constitutionalamendments reserved 30 percent of seats in elected village councils(Panchayats) for women, which has brought more than 1 million women into thepolitical life at the grassroots level. In September debate over the Women’s ReservationBill, which was designed to reserve one-third of parliamentary seats for women,subsided when the Government failed to introduce the bill during the monsoon sessionof Parliament. The bill was introduced but not debated in the winter sessionof Parliament. The Women’s Reservation Bill first was introduced in late 1998.The Constitution reserves seats in Parliament and state legislatures for ‘‘scheduledtribes’’ and ‘‘scheduled castes’’ in proportion to their population (see Section 5).Indigenous people actively participate in national and local politics, but their impactdepends on their numerical strength. In the northeastern states, indigenous peopleare a large proportion of the population and consequently exercise a dominant influencein the political process. In comparison, in Maharashtra and Gujarat, tribal peopleare a small minority and have been unsuccessful in blocking projects that theyoppose.Section 4. Governmental Attitude Regarding International and Nongovernmental Investigationof Alleged Violations of Human RightsIndependent human rights organizations operate throughout most of the country,investigating abuses and publishing their findings; however, in some states and ina few circumstances, human rights groups face some restrictions. Human rightsmonitors in Jammu and Kashmir have been unable to move around the state to documenthuman rights violations due to fear of retribution by security forces andcountermilitants. Since 1992 several individuals closely involved in the documentationof violations in Jammu and Kashmir, including lawyers and journalists, havebeen attacked and in some cases killed. International human rights monitors havehad difficulty in obtaining visas to visit the country for investigation purposes. Forexample, during the year the authorities continued to deny HRW and AmnestyInternational permission to visit Jammu and Kashmir; however, some foreign diplomatsgained improved access to some prisons in Jammu and Kashmir. The Governmentalso continued to deny the U.N. Special Rapporteurs on Torture andExtrajudicial Killings permission to visit the country, despite their repeated requests.Moreover, the police and security forces have arrested and harassed humanrights monitors. In May U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Sadako Ogata wasallowed to visit the country (see Section 2.d.).In September 1999, the Ministry of Home <strong>Affairs</strong> sent a notice to several prominentNGO’s asking them to justify their status as nonpolitical organizations underthe <strong>Foreign</strong> Contribution (Regulation) Act. According to HRW, the notice effectivelywas a threat to cut off foreign funding. The NGO’s, many of which worked on women’srights, communal violence, and Dalit and tribal issues, publicly had criticizedthe policies of the BJP-led government and the antisecular activities of the SanghParivar, a collective of rightwing Hindu organizations of which the BJP is a member.On May 24, an agent of the intelligence bureau visited and questioned the directorof the South Asia Human Rights Documentation Center (SAHRDC) about histravel earlier in the month to Geneva to participate in the meeting of the U.N.Human Rights Commission. In 1998 the Andhra Pradesh government issued a directiveto faculty members of state universities not to associate with the AndhraPradesh Civil Liberties Union (APCLC), a well-respected human rights organization.Following protests by faculty organizations, the directive was rescinded.On April 9, the Government prevented four members of a Kashmir human rightsorganization from traveling to the 56th annual meeting of the UNCHR in Geneva(see Section 2.d.).VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
2243According to HRW, on April 20, a mob of local residents and politicians raidedthe Almora and Jageswar offices of an NGO working primarily on women’s healthand empowerment in Uttar Pradesh. The attack allegedly was in response to a pamphletthat the NGO had published in 1999 on HIV transmission, which containedpurportedly sexually offensive material. Police and protestors assaulted staff andtrainees, and a number of persons were detained for a short period.According to Amnesty, the chief judicial magistrate in Srinagar released on bailGhulam Mohiuddin Najar, a political activist and teacher; however, immediatelyupon release, members of the Special Operations Group, a unit of the state police,shot and killed him at the court gate. According to Amnesty International, in Februarysecurity forces in Jammu and Kashmir pointed guns at journalists who wereattempting to investigate the killing of Najar.Amnesty International reported the November killing of human rights defenderT. Puroshottam in Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. A group of unidentified men wieldingknives attacked Puroshottam, the Joint Secretary of the Andhra Pradesh CivilLiberties <strong>Committee</strong>, in a local shop. Puroshottam was involved in numerous investigationsof alleged human rights violations by the police including torture andextrajudicial executions, had been attacked previously, and had received persistentthreatening telephone calls. There has been no independent investigation intoPuroshottam’s killing.There was no definitive resolution in the case of abducted and murdered Kashmirhuman rights monitor Jalil Andrabi. Human rights workers allege that the state isattempting to subvert the judicial process by withholding evidence (see Sections 1.a.and 1.b.). In Assam the investigation into the 1996 murder of human rights monitorand journalist Parag Das has yielded no definitive information on the identity of hiskiller. The assailant allegedly was a militant who previously had surrendered andwas supported by the Government (see Sections 1.a. and 2.a.).Several Christian-affiliated (in many cases, non-evangelical) international reliefagencies stated that, during the year, their work in delivering services to the poorbecame considerably more difficult due to threats, increased bureaucratic obstacles,and, in some cases, physical attacks on their field workers by Hindu extremists (seeSections 2.c. and 5).The Government appointed a National Human Rights Commission in 1993 withpowers to investigate and recommend policy changes, punishment, and compensationin cases of police abuse. In addition the NHRC is directed to contribute to theestablishment, growth, and functioning of human rights NGO’s. The Governmentappoints the members and finances the operations of the NHRC. The NHRC is seriouslyunderstaffed and prohibited by statute from directly investigating allegationsof abuse involving army and paramilitary forces.From April 1, 1998 to March 31, 1999 (the most recent reporting year), the NHRCreceived 40,724 new complaints of human rights violations. The Commission had13,512 cases awaiting consideration at the beginning of the reporting period. Of the54,236 cases before it in the 1998–99 year, the Commission reviewed 53,711, leaving525 awaiting review at the end of the year. Of the 53,711 cases considered duringthe year, 32,172 were dismissed; 10,718 were transmitted to other governmental authoritiesfor disposition; 3,395 were concluded, and 7,426 were pending. In the previous12-month period (April 1997 to March 1998), the Commission received 36,791complaints. The increased number of complaints in the most recent reporting yearis believed to be the result of the Commission’s increased visibility.The NHRC has sought to encourage a culture respective of human rights by fosteringhuman rights education in schools and universities, by offering assistanceand encouragement to human rights NGO’s, by supporting training programs forthe police, military forces, and paramilitary forces, and by making recommendationsto the central and state governments. During the year, the NHRC carried out, withthe assistance of NGO’s, a human rights training program for state police that includedstress counseling. The NHRC also has influenced the legislative process, particularlyby issuing a formal opinion that a new Prevention of Terrorism Act is notneeded, and by proposing Prison Reform Legislation. State Human Rights Commissionsexist in Assam, Manipur, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal,Tamil Nadu, Punjab, Jammu and Kashmir, Kerala, and Rajasthan; Uttar Pradeshtook legal steps to establish a commission but has yet to appoint members. In additionspecial courts to hear human rights cases have been established in Tamil Nadu,Uttar Pradesh, and Andhra Pradesh. The courts in Uttar Pradesh are not functioning,despite a September 1999 court order that they be reactivated. The NHRCalso encouraged the establishment of human rights cells in police headquarters inthe states.The NHRC also was involved in programs to eliminate child labor (see Section6.c.).VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
- Page 7 and 8:
2163All factions probably hold poli
- Page 9 and 10:
2165and unexploded ordnance. Nevert
- Page 11 and 12:
2167bade non-Muslims from living in
- Page 13 and 14:
2169tion of most of the country. Go
- Page 15 and 16:
2171Women accused of adultery also
- Page 17 and 18:
2173violations of the rights to edu
- Page 19 and 20:
2175paper and firewood, shining sho
- Page 21 and 22:
2177ister made remarks implying tha
- Page 23 and 24:
2179central unit of its student win
- Page 25 and 26:
2181humiliating, painful punishment
- Page 27 and 28:
2183ment of the split verdict in th
- Page 29 and 30:
2185The court system has two levels
- Page 31 and 32:
2187received death threats a few we
- Page 33 and 34:
2189ference, but on August 15 (the
- Page 35 and 36: 2191about 125 refugees and asylum s
- Page 37 and 38: 2193Section 5. Discrimination Based
- Page 39 and 40: 2195Indigenous People.—Tribal peo
- Page 41 and 42: 2197ers have the right to strike in
- Page 43 and 44: 2199sites, carry fruit, vegetables,
- Page 45 and 46: 2201based in the Department of Wome
- Page 47 and 48: 2203turn to the country, beat them,
- Page 49 and 50: 2205antinational crimes, including
- Page 51 and 52: 2207order to be eligible for nomina
- Page 53 and 54: 2209Children.—The Government has
- Page 55 and 56: 2211resentatives of the Nepalese Go
- Page 57 and 58: 2213east; continued detention throu
- Page 59 and 60: 2215Accountability remains a seriou
- Page 61 and 62: 2217The Disturbed Areas Act has bee
- Page 63 and 64: 2219lice courtyard in Punjab, appar
- Page 65 and 66: 2221the NLFT was retaliating for a
- Page 67 and 68: 2223The Ministry of Home Affairs re
- Page 69 and 70: 2225One of the suspects subsequentl
- Page 71 and 72: 2227human rights organization. The
- Page 73 and 74: 2229sions would seriously affect hu
- Page 75 and 76: 2231ment. There are effective chann
- Page 77 and 78: 2233three Border Security Force mem
- Page 79 and 80: 2235fice owned by an NGO at Konung
- Page 81 and 82: 2237nated, but many of its members
- Page 83 and 84: 2239ever, no further information wa
- Page 85: 2241The Tamil Nadu government provi
- Page 89 and 90: 2245and branded her with hot iron r
- Page 91 and 92: 2247also concerned about the lack o
- Page 93 and 94: 2249rights of the mentally ill and
- Page 95 and 96: 2251from women and children, gather
- Page 97 and 98: 2253The burning of churches continu
- Page 99 and 100: 2255suspected of belonging to an up
- Page 101 and 102: 2257Bonded labor, the result of a p
- Page 103 and 104: 2259ment officials more aware of th
- Page 105 and 106: 2261and ‘‘inhuman treatment.’
- Page 107 and 108: 2263illustration of the consequence
- Page 109 and 110: 2265The Government has permitted pr
- Page 111 and 112: 2267lations governing Internet acce
- Page 113 and 114: 2269Women traditionally have played
- Page 115 and 116: 2271In 1997 the Government for the
- Page 117 and 118: 2273pali Congress Party flags. A bo
- Page 119 and 120: 2275The authorities are more likely
- Page 121 and 122: 2277of the monarch who allegedly ki
- Page 123 and 124: 2279the Government generally does n
- Page 125 and 126: 2281areas along the country’s bor
- Page 127 and 128: 2283groups. Nevertheless, converts
- Page 129 and 130: 2285e. Acceptable Conditions of Wor
- Page 131 and 132: 2287Provisional Constitutional Orde
- Page 133 and 134: 2289assailants killed a leader of t
- Page 135 and 136: 2291ditions, Sindh Inspector Genera
- Page 137 and 138:
2293then another FIR is activated a
- Page 139 and 140:
2295Farooq Sattar was arrested by o
- Page 141 and 142:
2297case pending before any other s
- Page 143 and 144:
2299The Hudood ordinances criminali
- Page 145 and 146:
2301The Penal Code mandates the dea
- Page 147 and 148:
2303cast on television; however, so
- Page 149 and 150:
2305which stipulated a sentence of
- Page 151 and 152:
2307ties at times prevent political
- Page 153 and 154:
2309fair. Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
- Page 155 and 156:
2311sioners review blasphemy cases
- Page 157 and 158:
2313of Shari’a (see Section 1.c.)
- Page 159 and 160:
2315late head of the Board of Inter
- Page 161 and 162:
2317Courts also may order that chil
- Page 163 and 164:
2319portedly spared the two Muslim
- Page 165 and 166:
2321these services to a few core ar
- Page 167 and 168:
2323centers and 146 larger centers
- Page 169 and 170:
2325administration in Multan approa
- Page 171 and 172:
2327fore their mandates expired, se
- Page 173 and 174:
2329moved many detainees to another
- Page 175 and 176:
2331during the year and in previous
- Page 177 and 178:
2333The LTTE was responsible for a
- Page 179 and 180:
2335persons tried on criminal charg
- Page 181 and 182:
2337the other by the LTTE. The bord
- Page 183 and 184:
2339thor, remained subject to gover
- Page 185 and 186:
2341bombs exploded in the hall of t
- Page 187 and 188:
2343September 29, the Center for Mo
- Page 189 and 190:
2345a strong commitment to children
- Page 191 and 192:
2347All workers, other than civil s
- Page 193:
23491999, the LTTE began a program