2248no legislation that requires such action and none has been taken. In addition parentsoften give priority in health care and nutrition to male infants. Women’s rightsgroups point out that the burden of providing girls with an adequate dowry is onefactor that makes daughters less desirable. Although abetting or taking dowry theoreticallyis illegal under the Dowry Prohibition Act of 1961, it still is practiced widely.Bonded and unbonded child labor continues to be a serious problem throughoutthe country (see Sections 6.c. and 6.d.).People with Disabilities.—According to regional NGO’s, there are over 90 milliondisabled persons in the country. Neither law or regulations require accessibility forthe disabled. With the adoption of the Persons with Disability (Equal Opportunities,Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act in 1995, a nascent disabled rightsmovement slowly is raising public awareness of the rights of the disabled. Althoughthe act provides equal rights to all persons with disabilities, most disabled-relatedorganizations admit that its practical effects so far have been minimal, in part dueto a clause that makes the implementation of programs dependent on the ‘‘economiccapacity’’ of the Government. To a large degree, physical impediments still limit mobility,legislation prevents equality, and societal discrimination maintains the statusquo of the disabled.The Disabled Division of the Ministry of Welfare had a budget provision of morethan $38 million (1.65 billion rupees) for the 1998–99 fiscal year for a number oforganizations and committees at the national, regional, and local levels. The Ministrydelivers rehabilitation services to the rural population through 16 district centers.A national rehabilitation plan commits the Government to putting a rehabilitationcenter in each of more than 400 districts, but services still are concentrated inurban areas. Moreover, the impact of government programs has been limited. Significantfunding is provided to a few government organizations such as the ArtificialLimbs Manufacturing Corporation of India, the National Handicapped Finance andDevelopment Corporation, and the Rehabilitation Council of India. Each entity providesspecific services or training, including producing aids and prosthetics, promotingdisabled-oriented economic development activities, offering training tohealth-care professionals and vocational instructors concerning disabled-relatedissues, and providing comprehensive rehabilitation services to the rural disabled.Additional mini-grants are offered to NGO’s that coordinate programs for the disabledto facilitate their physical, social, and psychological rehabilitation and integrationinto mainstream society. During 1998–99, $3 million (130.5 million rupees) wasavailable. However, only half of this amount was allocated due to funding restrictionsplaced on each providing organization and the small number of them thatexist.Two significant programs to benefit the disabled are the National Project to IntegrateMentally Retarded in Family and Community and the National Institute forthe Multiple Disabilities. The first project, launched in six states in 1998, primarilyfocuses on children from the economically weaker sectors and promotes awarenessconcerning the mentally disabled, their problems, and their rights. The second is theMinistry of Welfare, which provides rehabilitation services to the disabled and isfostering greater awareness among communities throughout the country. As a resultof the passage of the Persons with Disabilities Act, there now is a Disabilities Commissionerwho oversees implementation of the act and its protections for the disabled.According to the Persons with Disability Act, 3 percent of positions in official officesand state-owned enterprises must be reserved for persons with visual, hearing,or orthopedic disabilities. The Government provides special railway fares, educationallowances, scholarships, customs exemptions, budgetary funds from the Ministry ofRural Development, and rehabilitation training to assist the disabled. However, implementationof these entitlements is not comprehensive. Although the Governmenthas taken significant steps toward improving the plight of the disabled, its involvementhas been insufficient. The majority of responsibility for caring for disabled personsstill lies with family members and voluntary groups.The NHRC continues to receive complaints relating to harassment, intolerance,and discrimination against the disabled. It currently is gathering information onthese cases and forwarding assessments to concerned NGO’s and government entities.However, this process is slow, and its effects so far have been minimal.The NHRC continued its efforts to improve conditions in mental hospitals and enhanceawareness of the rights of those with mental disabilities during the year. In1997 it commissioned an assessment of conditions at mental hospitals throughoutthe country, to be conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience.The assessment, whose results the NHRC released in July 1999, found thatconditions in mental institutions were unsatisfactory and in need of reform. TheVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
2249rights of the mentally ill and mentally disabled are provided for in the Constitutionand the Mental Health Act of 1987. However, the NHRC noted that despite theseprotections, conditions in many mental hospitals are unsatisfactory. They continueto embody old concepts of mental health care and essentially function as custodialrather than therapeutic institutions. Overcrowded and serving as ‘‘dumpinggrounds’’ for desperate relatives, some mental hospitals lack even basic amenitiesand have poor medical facilities. In August 1999, the NHRC reported that it hadassumed the management of mental hospitals in Ranchi, Bihar, Agra, UttarPradesh, and Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, at the direction of the Supreme Court. InFebruary NHRC Chairman Justice J.S. Verma asked chief ministers of all the statesand administrators of all the union territories ‘‘to issue clear directions to the inspectorgenerals of prisons to ensure that mentally ill persons are not kept in jailunder any circumstances.’’ However, there was little follow-up to the NHRC direction.Indigenous People.—The Innerline Regulations enacted by the British in 1873 stillprovide the basis for safeguarding tribal rights in most of the northeastern borderstates. They are in effect in Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, and Mizoram,but not in Tripura, in which the tribal population has been reduced to 30 percentof the total population due to increased Bengali migration since partition. These regulationsprohibit any person, including citizens from other states, from going beyondan inner boundary without a valid permit. No rubber, wax, ivory, or other forestproducts may be removed from the protected areas without prior authorization. Nooutsiders are allowed to own land in the tribal areas without approval from tribalauthorities.The 1991 census, the last conducted, showed that 8.08 percent of citizens belongedto scheduled tribes. According to the Indian Confederation of Indigenous and TribalPeople (ICITP), 80 percent of the tribal population live below the poverty level. InMay 1998, the NHRC established a panel to investigate the condition of the country’s20 million denotified tribal people, who in 1871 the British colonial governmentlabeled as belonging to ‘‘criminal tribes’’). During the year, the panel prepared a reportfor the NHRC on their condition and advised the NHRC in other ways.Denotifed tribal peoples are tribal people The colonial act listing these tribes wasrepealed in 1951, but the stigma remains and many of these tribal people still arediscriminated against actively. On February 15, the NHRC recommended that the‘‘Habitual Offenders Act,’’ aimed at the denotified and nomadic tribes, be repealed.According to the ICITP, more than 40,000 tribal women, mainly from Orissa andBihar, have been forced into situations of economic and sexual exploitation (see Sections6.c. and 6.f.); many come from tribes that were driven off the land by nationalpark schemes. Special courts to hear complaints of atrocities committed against tribalpeople were to have been established under the protection of Civil Rights Act of1976, but this never was accomplished.Despite constitutional safeguards, the rights of indigenous groups in the easternparts of the country often are ignored. Indigenous people suffer discrimination andharassment, have been deprived wrongly of their land, and have been subject to tortureand to arbitrary arrest. There has been encroachment on tribal land in almostevery eastern state, including by illegal Bangladeshi immigrants, and by businessesthat illegally have removed forest and mineral products. Moreover, persons fromother backgrounds often usurp places reserved for members of tribes and lowercastes in national education institutions. Mob lynchings, arson, and police atrocitiesagainst tribal people occur in many states (see Section 1.c.). For example, on January31, local landowners attacked the tribal village of Ghutewadi, Ahmednagar district,Maharashtra, killing a 60-year-old tribal woman and injuring 10 other womenand a child. On July 4, a mob killed a 90-year-old tribal woman and set 16 houseson fire following the abduction of a nontribal youth from Futotip village in NorthTripura. On August 17, a mob attacked Jatindra Kumr Jamatya, a tribal activistand member of the ruling CPI(M)in Nagrai, South Tripura.In the Andaman Islands in 1999, the local government implemented a policy ofpermitting development of the Jawara tribal area, which threatens the indigenousgroup’s way of life. The construction of a road through the forest that is inhabitedby this group and the encroachment of Indian settlers have impacted negatively thisindigenous group’s cultural vitality, economic self-sufficiency, and physical and mentalhealth. These integrative policies have been motivated partly by humanitarianconcerns, although interest in commercial exploitation of virgin forests that we inhabitedby tribal people is another strong factor behind these policies. A manifestationof this negative trend was a destructive outbreak of measles that affected about30 persons among the Jawara tribal people, which was reported in the press in September1999.VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
- Page 7 and 8:
2163All factions probably hold poli
- Page 9 and 10:
2165and unexploded ordnance. Nevert
- Page 11 and 12:
2167bade non-Muslims from living in
- Page 13 and 14:
2169tion of most of the country. Go
- Page 15 and 16:
2171Women accused of adultery also
- Page 17 and 18:
2173violations of the rights to edu
- Page 19 and 20:
2175paper and firewood, shining sho
- Page 21 and 22:
2177ister made remarks implying tha
- Page 23 and 24:
2179central unit of its student win
- Page 25 and 26:
2181humiliating, painful punishment
- Page 27 and 28:
2183ment of the split verdict in th
- Page 29 and 30:
2185The court system has two levels
- Page 31 and 32:
2187received death threats a few we
- Page 33 and 34:
2189ference, but on August 15 (the
- Page 35 and 36:
2191about 125 refugees and asylum s
- Page 37 and 38:
2193Section 5. Discrimination Based
- Page 39 and 40:
2195Indigenous People.—Tribal peo
- Page 41 and 42: 2197ers have the right to strike in
- Page 43 and 44: 2199sites, carry fruit, vegetables,
- Page 45 and 46: 2201based in the Department of Wome
- Page 47 and 48: 2203turn to the country, beat them,
- Page 49 and 50: 2205antinational crimes, including
- Page 51 and 52: 2207order to be eligible for nomina
- Page 53 and 54: 2209Children.—The Government has
- Page 55 and 56: 2211resentatives of the Nepalese Go
- Page 57 and 58: 2213east; continued detention throu
- Page 59 and 60: 2215Accountability remains a seriou
- Page 61 and 62: 2217The Disturbed Areas Act has bee
- Page 63 and 64: 2219lice courtyard in Punjab, appar
- Page 65 and 66: 2221the NLFT was retaliating for a
- Page 67 and 68: 2223The Ministry of Home Affairs re
- Page 69 and 70: 2225One of the suspects subsequentl
- Page 71 and 72: 2227human rights organization. The
- Page 73 and 74: 2229sions would seriously affect hu
- Page 75 and 76: 2231ment. There are effective chann
- Page 77 and 78: 2233three Border Security Force mem
- Page 79 and 80: 2235fice owned by an NGO at Konung
- Page 81 and 82: 2237nated, but many of its members
- Page 83 and 84: 2239ever, no further information wa
- Page 85 and 86: 2241The Tamil Nadu government provi
- Page 87 and 88: 2243According to HRW, on April 20,
- Page 89 and 90: 2245and branded her with hot iron r
- Page 91: 2247also concerned about the lack o
- Page 95 and 96: 2251from women and children, gather
- Page 97 and 98: 2253The burning of churches continu
- Page 99 and 100: 2255suspected of belonging to an up
- Page 101 and 102: 2257Bonded labor, the result of a p
- Page 103 and 104: 2259ment officials more aware of th
- Page 105 and 106: 2261and ‘‘inhuman treatment.’
- Page 107 and 108: 2263illustration of the consequence
- Page 109 and 110: 2265The Government has permitted pr
- Page 111 and 112: 2267lations governing Internet acce
- Page 113 and 114: 2269Women traditionally have played
- Page 115 and 116: 2271In 1997 the Government for the
- Page 117 and 118: 2273pali Congress Party flags. A bo
- Page 119 and 120: 2275The authorities are more likely
- Page 121 and 122: 2277of the monarch who allegedly ki
- Page 123 and 124: 2279the Government generally does n
- Page 125 and 126: 2281areas along the country’s bor
- Page 127 and 128: 2283groups. Nevertheless, converts
- Page 129 and 130: 2285e. Acceptable Conditions of Wor
- Page 131 and 132: 2287Provisional Constitutional Orde
- Page 133 and 134: 2289assailants killed a leader of t
- Page 135 and 136: 2291ditions, Sindh Inspector Genera
- Page 137 and 138: 2293then another FIR is activated a
- Page 139 and 140: 2295Farooq Sattar was arrested by o
- Page 141 and 142: 2297case pending before any other s
- Page 143 and 144:
2299The Hudood ordinances criminali
- Page 145 and 146:
2301The Penal Code mandates the dea
- Page 147 and 148:
2303cast on television; however, so
- Page 149 and 150:
2305which stipulated a sentence of
- Page 151 and 152:
2307ties at times prevent political
- Page 153 and 154:
2309fair. Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
- Page 155 and 156:
2311sioners review blasphemy cases
- Page 157 and 158:
2313of Shari’a (see Section 1.c.)
- Page 159 and 160:
2315late head of the Board of Inter
- Page 161 and 162:
2317Courts also may order that chil
- Page 163 and 164:
2319portedly spared the two Muslim
- Page 165 and 166:
2321these services to a few core ar
- Page 167 and 168:
2323centers and 146 larger centers
- Page 169 and 170:
2325administration in Multan approa
- Page 171 and 172:
2327fore their mandates expired, se
- Page 173 and 174:
2329moved many detainees to another
- Page 175 and 176:
2331during the year and in previous
- Page 177 and 178:
2333The LTTE was responsible for a
- Page 179 and 180:
2335persons tried on criminal charg
- Page 181 and 182:
2337the other by the LTTE. The bord
- Page 183 and 184:
2339thor, remained subject to gover
- Page 185 and 186:
2341bombs exploded in the hall of t
- Page 187 and 188:
2343September 29, the Center for Mo
- Page 189 and 190:
2345a strong commitment to children
- Page 191 and 192:
2347All workers, other than civil s
- Page 193:
23491999, the LTTE began a program