2224Government stated that it would investigate the fate of eight persons who reportedlydisappeared in Jammu and Kashmir during 1997: Fayaz Ahmad Beigh, FayazAhmad Khan, Abdula Rashid Wahid, Mohammed Ashraf Dar, Mohammed AfzalShah, Nisar Ahmad Wani, Manzoor Ahmad Dar, and Bilal Ahmad Sheikh. In September1998, the Government accounted for only one of the eight persons, claimingthat Fayaz Ahmad Beigh had escaped from police custody on September 9, 1997,and was believed to have crossed the line of control into Pakistan. By year’s end,no new information was available on any of these cases. As of December 1997, 55cases of disappearance and custodial death still were pending against Border SecurityForce personnel in Jammu and Kashmir (see Sections 1.a. and 1.c.).The Government maintains that screening committees administered by the stategovernments provide information about detainees to their families. However, othersources indicate that families are able to confirm the detention of their relativesonly by bribing prison guards. For example, in May the People’s Union for Civil Liberties(PUCL) published an appeal by Sunita Majumdar, the mother of ParthaMajumdar, who was taken from his home by police in District 24 Parganas, WestBengal, in September 1997, and has not been seen since. Police have provided noinformation in the case despite a request from the State Human Rights Commission.Partha Majumdar was a witness to an alleged police shooting that left one persondead. In May the State Human Rights Commission recommended that a criminalinvestigation be initiated against police involved in the incident; however, it is notknown whether the requested criminal investigation was initiated. A program ofprison visits by the International <strong>Committee</strong> of the Red Cross (ICRC), which beganin October 1995, is designed in part to help assure communications between detaineesand their families. During the year, the ICRC visited approximately 1,000 detaineesin about 20 places of detention. All acknowledged detention centers inJammu and Kashmir and Kashmiri detainees elsewhere in the country were visited.However, the ICRC is not authorized to visit interrogation centers or transit centers,nor does it have access to regular detention centers in the northeastern states(see Sections 1.c. and 4).In Punjab the pattern of disappearances prevalent in the early 1990’s appears tohave ended. Hundreds of police and security officials were not held accountable forserious human rights abuses committed during the counterinsurgency of 1984–94.However, steps were taken against a few such violators. The CBI claims to be pursuingactively charges against dozens of police officials implicated in the ‘‘mass cremations’’case. Police in the Tarn Taran district secretly disposed of bodies of suspectedmilitants believed to have been abducted and extrajudicially executed, crematingthem without the knowledge or consent of their families. The CBI in its reportto the Supreme Court in December 1996 stated that Punjab police secretly hadcremated over 2,000 bodies in Tarn Taran; of these, 585 bodies had been identifiedfully, 274 had been identified partially, and 1,238 were unidentified. Most reportedlywere killed by Border Security Force personnel while they were attempting to enterthe country from Pakistan, were unidentified victims of accidents or suicide, or diedin clashes between militant factions. However, 424 persons apparently were militantskilled in the interior of the district, 291 of whom subsequently were identified.These numbers demonstrate the extent of the violence during those years and, giventhe pattern of police abuses prevalent during the period, credibly include many personskilled in extrajudicial executions. The NHRC is seeking to obtain compensationfor the families of those victims whose remains were identified, but the Governmenthas challenged the NHRC’s jurisdiction in the cases. In September 1998, the SupremeCourt upheld the right of the NHRC to investigate the cases. In August 1998,the <strong>Committee</strong> for the Coordination on Disappearances in Punjab (CCDP) memberand former Supreme Court Justice Kuldip Singh presented the Chief Minister ofPunjab with a list of approximately 3,000 persons who either were missing or haddied in encounters with security forces during the period of unrest in Punjub.Former Justice Singh also announced that the CCDP would form a threemembercommission to investigate the mass cremations. The Commission received little cooperationfrom state government authorities and made little progress during theyear (see Section 4).Amnesty International in its April report on human rights defenders in the countryexpressed concern that Punjab police officials continued to obstruct the judicialinquiry into the death of human rights monitor Jaswant Singh Khalra, hinderingefforts to probe the Tarn Taran cremations. Khalra was investigating the cremationof unidentified bodies by Tarn Taran police. Several witnesses observed Punjab policeofficials arrest Khalra outside his Amritsar home in September 1995. Police officialssubsequently denied that they had arrested Khalra, and he has not been seensince. In July 1996, following its investigation, the CBI identified nine Punjab policeofficials as responsible for Khalra’s abduction and recommended their prosecution.VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
2225One of the suspects subsequently died, reportedly by suicide; none of the otherswere charged by year’s end. One human rights organization credibly alleged thatpolice intimidated a witness in the case in August, threatening to kill him if he testifiedagainst them. These events prompted extended public debate over the accountabilityof Punjab police for abuses committed while suppressing a violent insurgency.According to human rights monitors in Punjab, approximately 100 policeofficials either were facing charges, were prosecuted, or were under investigation forhuman rights abuses at year’s end.There are credible reports that police throughout the country often do not file requiredarrest reports. As a result, there are hundreds of unsolved disappearancesin which relatives claim that an individual was taken into police custody and neverheard from again. Police usually deny these claims, countering that there are norecords of arrest. In Manipur 14-year-old Yumlembam Sanamacha of Thoubal districthas been missing since soldiers arrested him in February 1998. The army reportedlydetained him because of his alleged links with insurgent groups. The All-Manipur Students’ Union petitioned the Guwahati High Court for Sanamacha’s release.The Court ordered the army to produce the boy, but it failed to do so andhis whereabouts remain unknown. On May 5, 1999, police in Siliguri, West Bengal,arrested 14-year-old Pinter Yadav and his 9yearold cousin. According to localhuman rights monitors, the boys were beaten and, when Pinter began to vomitblood, he was taken to a local police station. He has not been seen since, and effortsby family members to petition police for information were unsuccessful.Militants in Jammu and Kashmir and the northeastern states continued to usekidnapings to terrorize the population, seek the release of detained comrades, andextort funds. Sometimes kidnaped persons later were killed (see Sections 1.a. and1.g.). According to government figures, there were 634 kidnapings in the northeasternstates during 1999. There were no significant new developments in the caseof the 1995 kidnapings of American, British, German, and Norwegian nationals, despitepolice cooperation with foreign diplomats.On April 15, the BNLF abducted two officials of the Mizoram Public Health EngineeringDepartment. The rebels released the captives on May 16, after the interventionof three local church leaders. On April 19, members of the Reang ethnic minorityabducted a teacher in Aizawl, Mizoram. On May 13, NLFT guerillas abductedtwo tea garden staff from Kailashahar. On May 14, NLFT militants injured threepersons and abducted three others in Udaypur (see Section 1.c.). Also on May 14,tribal guerillas abducted three persons and set a number of houses on fire inRadhakishorpur and Kanchanpur, Tripura. On May 15, NLFT militants killed fourpersons and abducted three others in west and south Tripura (see Section 1.a.).CPM sources allege that all of the victims were CPM supporters, and that the NLFTwas punishing them for voting for the CPM in the council elections. On May 17,the NLFT shot two villagers whom they had kidnaped from Manu on February 28.On May 23, NSCN(K) supporters abducted seven persons in Borduria village, Tirapdistrict, Arunachal Pradesh. On May 26, ATTF killed a tribal person and kidnapedfour other persons (see Section 1.a.). On May 31, an NLFT militant abducted CPMworker Ajit Debbarma from Jampuijala, West Tripura. On June 6, in the AndamanIslands, Tamil immigrants from Sri Lanka abducted and took hostage ManoranjanBhakta, a former Congress Party Member of Parliament, for more than 24 hourson Katchal Island. On June 14, the Manipur based Hmar People’s Conference (HPC)released the two engineers and four technicians of the Northeastern Electric PowerCorporation (NEEPCO) who were abducted on March 31 from Mizoram. On June22, NLFT rebels kidnaped a tribal family in Khowai. On June 29, tribal militantsabducted seven nontribals in Melaghar, Gandacherra and Brahmacherra. On July3, North Tripura tribal guerrillas kidnaped a nontribal youth; in retaliation a mobkilled an elderly tribal woman and burned down a number of houses. Also on July3, NLFT militants abducted the manager of Golakpur Tea estate in north Tripura.On July 4, tribal militants in Dhalai, Tripura, kidnaped a health department official.On July 14, tribals set fire to more than 150 houses, injured 3 persons, andkidnaped another in Teliamura. On July 23, NLFT militants kidnaped four tribalsfrom a Garo colony in South Tripura. On August 16, nine Tripura villagers werekidnaped in Brahmachhara Udaypur subdivision. On August 17, militants abductedthree persons from Manu and killed a villager at Panisagar (see Section 1.a.).c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.—The law prohibits torture, and confessions extracted by force generally are inadmissiblein court; however, torture is common throughout the country, and authoritiesoften use torture during interrogations. In other instances, they torture detaineesto extort money and sometimes as summary punishment.In 1997 the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Torture reported that the security forcessystematically torture persons in Jammu and Kashmir in order to coerce them toVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
- Page 7 and 8:
2163All factions probably hold poli
- Page 9 and 10:
2165and unexploded ordnance. Nevert
- Page 11 and 12:
2167bade non-Muslims from living in
- Page 13 and 14:
2169tion of most of the country. Go
- Page 15 and 16:
2171Women accused of adultery also
- Page 17 and 18: 2173violations of the rights to edu
- Page 19 and 20: 2175paper and firewood, shining sho
- Page 21 and 22: 2177ister made remarks implying tha
- Page 23 and 24: 2179central unit of its student win
- Page 25 and 26: 2181humiliating, painful punishment
- Page 27 and 28: 2183ment of the split verdict in th
- Page 29 and 30: 2185The court system has two levels
- Page 31 and 32: 2187received death threats a few we
- Page 33 and 34: 2189ference, but on August 15 (the
- Page 35 and 36: 2191about 125 refugees and asylum s
- Page 37 and 38: 2193Section 5. Discrimination Based
- Page 39 and 40: 2195Indigenous People.—Tribal peo
- Page 41 and 42: 2197ers have the right to strike in
- Page 43 and 44: 2199sites, carry fruit, vegetables,
- Page 45 and 46: 2201based in the Department of Wome
- Page 47 and 48: 2203turn to the country, beat them,
- Page 49 and 50: 2205antinational crimes, including
- Page 51 and 52: 2207order to be eligible for nomina
- Page 53 and 54: 2209Children.—The Government has
- Page 55 and 56: 2211resentatives of the Nepalese Go
- Page 57 and 58: 2213east; continued detention throu
- Page 59 and 60: 2215Accountability remains a seriou
- Page 61 and 62: 2217The Disturbed Areas Act has bee
- Page 63 and 64: 2219lice courtyard in Punjab, appar
- Page 65 and 66: 2221the NLFT was retaliating for a
- Page 67: 2223The Ministry of Home Affairs re
- Page 71 and 72: 2227human rights organization. The
- Page 73 and 74: 2229sions would seriously affect hu
- Page 75 and 76: 2231ment. There are effective chann
- Page 77 and 78: 2233three Border Security Force mem
- Page 79 and 80: 2235fice owned by an NGO at Konung
- Page 81 and 82: 2237nated, but many of its members
- Page 83 and 84: 2239ever, no further information wa
- Page 85 and 86: 2241The Tamil Nadu government provi
- Page 87 and 88: 2243According to HRW, on April 20,
- Page 89 and 90: 2245and branded her with hot iron r
- Page 91 and 92: 2247also concerned about the lack o
- Page 93 and 94: 2249rights of the mentally ill and
- Page 95 and 96: 2251from women and children, gather
- Page 97 and 98: 2253The burning of churches continu
- Page 99 and 100: 2255suspected of belonging to an up
- Page 101 and 102: 2257Bonded labor, the result of a p
- Page 103 and 104: 2259ment officials more aware of th
- Page 105 and 106: 2261and ‘‘inhuman treatment.’
- Page 107 and 108: 2263illustration of the consequence
- Page 109 and 110: 2265The Government has permitted pr
- Page 111 and 112: 2267lations governing Internet acce
- Page 113 and 114: 2269Women traditionally have played
- Page 115 and 116: 2271In 1997 the Government for the
- Page 117 and 118: 2273pali Congress Party flags. A bo
- Page 119 and 120:
2275The authorities are more likely
- Page 121 and 122:
2277of the monarch who allegedly ki
- Page 123 and 124:
2279the Government generally does n
- Page 125 and 126:
2281areas along the country’s bor
- Page 127 and 128:
2283groups. Nevertheless, converts
- Page 129 and 130:
2285e. Acceptable Conditions of Wor
- Page 131 and 132:
2287Provisional Constitutional Orde
- Page 133 and 134:
2289assailants killed a leader of t
- Page 135 and 136:
2291ditions, Sindh Inspector Genera
- Page 137 and 138:
2293then another FIR is activated a
- Page 139 and 140:
2295Farooq Sattar was arrested by o
- Page 141 and 142:
2297case pending before any other s
- Page 143 and 144:
2299The Hudood ordinances criminali
- Page 145 and 146:
2301The Penal Code mandates the dea
- Page 147 and 148:
2303cast on television; however, so
- Page 149 and 150:
2305which stipulated a sentence of
- Page 151 and 152:
2307ties at times prevent political
- Page 153 and 154:
2309fair. Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
- Page 155 and 156:
2311sioners review blasphemy cases
- Page 157 and 158:
2313of Shari’a (see Section 1.c.)
- Page 159 and 160:
2315late head of the Board of Inter
- Page 161 and 162:
2317Courts also may order that chil
- Page 163 and 164:
2319portedly spared the two Muslim
- Page 165 and 166:
2321these services to a few core ar
- Page 167 and 168:
2323centers and 146 larger centers
- Page 169 and 170:
2325administration in Multan approa
- Page 171 and 172:
2327fore their mandates expired, se
- Page 173 and 174:
2329moved many detainees to another
- Page 175 and 176:
2331during the year and in previous
- Page 177 and 178:
2333The LTTE was responsible for a
- Page 179 and 180:
2335persons tried on criminal charg
- Page 181 and 182:
2337the other by the LTTE. The bord
- Page 183 and 184:
2339thor, remained subject to gover
- Page 185 and 186:
2341bombs exploded in the hall of t
- Page 187 and 188:
2343September 29, the Center for Mo
- Page 189 and 190:
2345a strong commitment to children
- Page 191 and 192:
2347All workers, other than civil s
- Page 193:
23491999, the LTTE began a program