2338The LTTE expropriates food, fuel, and other items meant for IDP’s, thus exacerbatingthe plight of such persons in LTTE-controlled areas. Malnutrition remaineda problem in LTTE-controlled and other parts of the Vanni region, with nutritionlevels falling below the national average. Experts have reported an increase in anemiaand a lower birth rate, both of which indicate lower levels of nutrition. Therewere confirmed cases of malnutrition, including hundreds of cases of malnourishedchildren. Malnutrition resulted from several factors, including food shortages, poverty,and conflict-related dislocations. However, a survey completed by MedecinsSans Frontieres in 1999 found malnutrition levels in the war-affected areas at aboutthe same level as in the war-free south of the country. Medical sources distinguishbetween ‘‘undernourished’’ children (of which there are many throughout the country)and ‘‘malnourished’’ children.Landmines were a problem in Jaffna and the Vanni and to some extent in theeast. Landmines, booby traps, and unexploded ordnance pose a problem to resettlementof displaced persons and rebuilding. A U.N. landmine team tasked with locatingand mapping LTTE and army mines in the Jaffna peninsula suspended its missionin April, stating that it was impossible to continue as long as hostilities continued.According to the Landmine Monitor Report for 2000, both the LTTE and themilitary abandoned promises given in 1999 not to place new mines in areas designatedfor civilian resettlement. Sources reported 16 civilians were killed or woundedfrom January to give end of August in incidents involving mines or unexplodedordnance. On November 28, a landmine blast attributed to the LTTE killed 7 personsand injured 24 passengers on a bus in Anuradhapura district. In contrast 20such accidents occurred in 1999. Sources have confirmed that the SLA is makinggreat efforts to clear all explosives from areas that it has recaptured.Section 2. Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:a. Freedom of Speech and Press.—The Constitution provides for freedom of speechand expression; however, the Government restricts these rights in practice, oftenusing national security grounds permitted by law. During the year, the Governmentlimited the access of domestic and foreign media to information and continued tocensor news relating to the military and security situation. In June 1998, the Governmentimposed direct censorship on all domestic and foreign media reports relatingto ongoing or possible future military and other security operations. The Governmentreissued its censorship order in November 1999 after the military suffered setbacksin the field. Even when no specific government censorship is exercised, privatetelevision stations impose their own, informal censorship on international televisionnews rebroadcast in the country. In May the Government passed new ER totighten censorship rules, to give the Government power to impound printing presses,and to close newspapers or broadcast stations it perceived as threats to nationalsecurity. Subsequently a local NGO filed a fundamental rights case in the SupremeCourt opposing censorship as a human rights violation. The court refused to considerthe case. On November 1, International Press Institute (IPI) placed the countryon its ‘‘watch list’’ of countries which ‘‘appear to be moving towards suppressingor restricting press freedom.’’ IPI cited the new Emergency Regulations as an impedimentto free media expression.Despite earlier campaign promises to divest itself of its media holdings, the Governmentcontrols the country’s largest newspaper chain, two major television stations,and the Sri Lanka Broadcasting Corporation (SLBC, a radio station). Thereare a variety of independent, privately owned newspapers, journals and radio andtelevision stations, most of which freely criticize the Government and its policies.However, some journalists practiced self-censorship due to fear of intimidation.There is also a privately owned newspaper published in Jaffna. The Government imposesno political restrictions on the establishment of new media enterprises.The Government has failed to reform the press law and privatize governmentownedmedia as promised during the 1994 election campaign. In 1997 there was anattempt to pass a broadcast reform bill that was ultimately unsuccessful and furtherrevisions subsequently proposed by a blue-ribbon panel have yet to be implemented.In a January speech, the President attacked the press and singled out individualsand media organizations for criticism by name. After passing the new ER in May,the Government created a special media information center to approve print andbroadcast material produced in the country, including that of foreign journalists.Later that month, the SLBC defied an order by the censor and continued to broadcastthe BBC’s Sinhala-language news program. After a period of controversy, theMedia Minister allowed the broadcasts to continue. The President officially easedcensorship restrictions on foreign journalists in a circular published on June 5, althoughmaterial for publication or broadcast within the country, regardless of au-VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00182 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.036 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
2339thor, remained subject to government approval. As a result of the Government’s actions,journalists practiced self-censorship.In late May, the Government used its power under the new ER to close two publicationsin Colombo and the independent newspaper in Jaffna, citing security concerns.The Supreme Court in late June declared the censorship regulations to be invalid,and it ordered the Government to allow the newspapers to reopen. The Governmentcomplied with the ruling, but it reissued the regulations in a manner consistentwith the Supreme Court ruling.On September 19, police arrested a young man for criticizing the President on aradio call-in show. Police traced the call to discover the caller’s address. The youngman’s parents alleged that he had a mental illness and could not be held responsiblefor his comments. Regardless at year’s end, the young man remained in prisonpending a hearing of the case.On January 2, unknown attackers set fire to the home of an actress who supportedthe opposition party candidate during the 1999 presidential election campaign.On January 26, presumed government supporters attacked a husband andwife singing duo, who also had supported the opposition presidential candidate. OnApril 6, the local BBC correspondent was assaulted while covering a rally that protestedNorway’s involvement in the country’s peace process. Other journalists reportedthreats for expressing opinions critical of the Government. Several fled thecountry.During the year, police detained two persons for questioning in connection withthe 1999 murder of Rohana Kumara, editor of a Sinhala-language newspaper whichhad been critical of leading figures in the ruling coalition. By year’s end, no one hadbeen charged in connection with the case. Similarly authorities made no progressin the 1999 murder of Ramesh Nadarajah, a Tamil Member of Parliament and theeditor of a Tamil-language weekly.In March 1999, an army brigadier allegedly abducted and assaulted a journalistworking for an independent Sinhala-language newspaper. Police arrested the brigadier,after which courts granted him bail. The case did not come to trial during theyear.In February 1998, armed men attacked a journalist who regularly reported on defensematters, including corruption in military procurements. The Government criticizedthe attack; it subsequently arrested and indicted two air force personnel in thecase, including the bodyguard of a former commander of the air force. A formal indictmentwas handed down in 1999. Courts postponed the hearings several timesduring the year; the case was scheduled to reconvene in February 2001.The editor of a leading national newspaper who was found guilty of defaming thePresident in 1997 appealed the verdict that year. On December 5, an appellate courtupheld the lower court’s ruling. The editor appealed the decision to the SupremeCourt. Another defamation case filed by the President in 1995 led to the September5 conviction of an editor of another important English-language weekly. The editorreceived a 2-year jail sentence, later suspended; he appealed. Other defamationcases filed by the President against editors of major newspapers critical of the Governmentor supportive of the opposition remained pending. Journalists viewed thesecases as frivolous and intended only to intimidate and harass the media.The Sri Lanka Tamil Media Alliance was formed in 1999 to protect the interestsof Tamil journalists, who allege that they are subject to harassment and intimidationby Tamil paramilitary groups and Sri Lankan security forces. Regional Tamilcorrespondents working in the war zones have complained of arbitrary arrest anddetention and difficulty in obtaining press accreditation. In August 1999, the SriLanka Tamil Media Alliance filed the first-ever fundamental rights case on behalfof an ethnic Tamil reporter on the staff of the government-owned and-controlledTamil language daily. Security forces arrested the reporter on August 21, 1999, onsuspicion of affiliation with the LTTE and later released him. The court ruled thatthe security forces had acted within their rights in detaining the reporter and refusedto award compensation.Travel by foreign and national journalists to the conflict areas was restricted, butin September the Government began approving some requests for journalists (bothlocal and foreign) to travel north and they organized transport for selected journaliststo visit Jaffna; however, the Government did not announce a formal policychange. Both local and foreign journalists still were required to obtain advance permissionfrom the Ministry of Defense for travel to conflict areas. The <strong>Foreign</strong> Ministryalso had to approve visits to conflict areas by foreign journalists. Bureaucraticdelays in processing requests have been reduced, but they still prevail. The Governmentoccasionally arranges for groups of journalists to visit Jaffna and the vicinityof the front lines on tightly organized briefing tours. The Government remains theVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00183 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.036 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
- Page 7 and 8:
2163All factions probably hold poli
- Page 9 and 10:
2165and unexploded ordnance. Nevert
- Page 11 and 12:
2167bade non-Muslims from living in
- Page 13 and 14:
2169tion of most of the country. Go
- Page 15 and 16:
2171Women accused of adultery also
- Page 17 and 18:
2173violations of the rights to edu
- Page 19 and 20:
2175paper and firewood, shining sho
- Page 21 and 22:
2177ister made remarks implying tha
- Page 23 and 24:
2179central unit of its student win
- Page 25 and 26:
2181humiliating, painful punishment
- Page 27 and 28:
2183ment of the split verdict in th
- Page 29 and 30:
2185The court system has two levels
- Page 31 and 32:
2187received death threats a few we
- Page 33 and 34:
2189ference, but on August 15 (the
- Page 35 and 36:
2191about 125 refugees and asylum s
- Page 37 and 38:
2193Section 5. Discrimination Based
- Page 39 and 40:
2195Indigenous People.—Tribal peo
- Page 41 and 42:
2197ers have the right to strike in
- Page 43 and 44:
2199sites, carry fruit, vegetables,
- Page 45 and 46:
2201based in the Department of Wome
- Page 47 and 48:
2203turn to the country, beat them,
- Page 49 and 50:
2205antinational crimes, including
- Page 51 and 52:
2207order to be eligible for nomina
- Page 53 and 54:
2209Children.—The Government has
- Page 55 and 56:
2211resentatives of the Nepalese Go
- Page 57 and 58:
2213east; continued detention throu
- Page 59 and 60:
2215Accountability remains a seriou
- Page 61 and 62:
2217The Disturbed Areas Act has bee
- Page 63 and 64:
2219lice courtyard in Punjab, appar
- Page 65 and 66:
2221the NLFT was retaliating for a
- Page 67 and 68:
2223The Ministry of Home Affairs re
- Page 69 and 70:
2225One of the suspects subsequentl
- Page 71 and 72:
2227human rights organization. The
- Page 73 and 74:
2229sions would seriously affect hu
- Page 75 and 76:
2231ment. There are effective chann
- Page 77 and 78:
2233three Border Security Force mem
- Page 79 and 80:
2235fice owned by an NGO at Konung
- Page 81 and 82:
2237nated, but many of its members
- Page 83 and 84:
2239ever, no further information wa
- Page 85 and 86:
2241The Tamil Nadu government provi
- Page 87 and 88:
2243According to HRW, on April 20,
- Page 89 and 90:
2245and branded her with hot iron r
- Page 91 and 92:
2247also concerned about the lack o
- Page 93 and 94:
2249rights of the mentally ill and
- Page 95 and 96:
2251from women and children, gather
- Page 97 and 98:
2253The burning of churches continu
- Page 99 and 100:
2255suspected of belonging to an up
- Page 101 and 102:
2257Bonded labor, the result of a p
- Page 103 and 104:
2259ment officials more aware of th
- Page 105 and 106:
2261and ‘‘inhuman treatment.’
- Page 107 and 108:
2263illustration of the consequence
- Page 109 and 110:
2265The Government has permitted pr
- Page 111 and 112:
2267lations governing Internet acce
- Page 113 and 114:
2269Women traditionally have played
- Page 115 and 116:
2271In 1997 the Government for the
- Page 117 and 118:
2273pali Congress Party flags. A bo
- Page 119 and 120:
2275The authorities are more likely
- Page 121 and 122:
2277of the monarch who allegedly ki
- Page 123 and 124:
2279the Government generally does n
- Page 125 and 126:
2281areas along the country’s bor
- Page 127 and 128:
2283groups. Nevertheless, converts
- Page 129 and 130:
2285e. Acceptable Conditions of Wor
- Page 131 and 132: 2287Provisional Constitutional Orde
- Page 133 and 134: 2289assailants killed a leader of t
- Page 135 and 136: 2291ditions, Sindh Inspector Genera
- Page 137 and 138: 2293then another FIR is activated a
- Page 139 and 140: 2295Farooq Sattar was arrested by o
- Page 141 and 142: 2297case pending before any other s
- Page 143 and 144: 2299The Hudood ordinances criminali
- Page 145 and 146: 2301The Penal Code mandates the dea
- Page 147 and 148: 2303cast on television; however, so
- Page 149 and 150: 2305which stipulated a sentence of
- Page 151 and 152: 2307ties at times prevent political
- Page 153 and 154: 2309fair. Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
- Page 155 and 156: 2311sioners review blasphemy cases
- Page 157 and 158: 2313of Shari’a (see Section 1.c.)
- Page 159 and 160: 2315late head of the Board of Inter
- Page 161 and 162: 2317Courts also may order that chil
- Page 163 and 164: 2319portedly spared the two Muslim
- Page 165 and 166: 2321these services to a few core ar
- Page 167 and 168: 2323centers and 146 larger centers
- Page 169 and 170: 2325administration in Multan approa
- Page 171 and 172: 2327fore their mandates expired, se
- Page 173 and 174: 2329moved many detainees to another
- Page 175 and 176: 2331during the year and in previous
- Page 177 and 178: 2333The LTTE was responsible for a
- Page 179 and 180: 2335persons tried on criminal charg
- Page 181: 2337the other by the LTTE. The bord
- Page 185 and 186: 2341bombs exploded in the hall of t
- Page 187 and 188: 2343September 29, the Center for Mo
- Page 189 and 190: 2345a strong commitment to children
- Page 191 and 192: 2347All workers, other than civil s
- Page 193: 23491999, the LTTE began a program