2186women were confined in a center for vagrants, where some alleged that they wereabused. By December fewer than a dozen remained in the vagrant homes (see Section1.c.).In 1999 police and paramilitary troops forced more than 50,000 persons from theirhomes in 6 Dhaka slum areas. The Government continued its slum clearances duringthe year. On April 15, the Government demolished 700 homes in theSegunbagicha slum area. On April 30, police officials demolished the Paribaghslums, leaving 1,100 persons without shelter. After police announced the destructionof the railway slum in Kawran Bazar, residents protested the 1-day notice. Policeused rubber bullets and batons to subdue the protesters, injuring 30 persons. Policeand hired laborers set fire to 20 huts, but were unable to dislodge the slum dwellers(see Section 1.c.).The Government sometimes punishes family members for the alleged crimes ofothers (see Section 1.c.). According to one human rights organization and a publishedaccount by one of the victims, on the evening of June 17, police raided ahouse in the Khilgaon section of Dhaka, and after failing to locate their intendedtarget, arrested his parents and beat his sisters. In November when police could notfind Bahauddin, editor of an opposition paper, to arrest him under charges of sedition,they arrested his brother, Mainuddin, instead. Mainuddin was not connectedwith the sedition charge; however, police arrested him under the SPA (see Sections1.d. and 2.a.).The Special Branch division of the police, National Security Intelligence, and theDirectorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI) employ informers to report on citizensperceived to be political opponents of the Government and to conduct surveillanceof them. Political leaders, human rights activists, foreign NGO’s, and journalistsreport occasional harassment by these security organizations. For example, representativesfrom one human rights organization report that police harassed theirrepresentatives in Comilla and Chittagong.Section 2. Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:a. Freedom of Speech and Press.—The Constitution provides for freedom of speech,expression, and the press, subject to ‘‘reasonable restrictions’’ in the interest of security,friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency and morality, or toprohibit defamation or incitement to an offense; however, there were numerous examplesof the Government limiting these rights in practice. Some government leadersencouraged violence against journalists by ruling party members.The press, numbering hundreds of daily and weekly publications, is a forum fora wide range of views. While most publications support the overall policies of theGovernment, several newspapers report critically on government policies and activities,including those of the Prime Minister. In addition to an official governmentownedwire service, there is one privately-owned wire service affiliated with a majorinternational company.Newspaper ownership and content are not subject to direct government restriction.However, if the Government chooses, it can influence journalists through financialmeans. Government-sponsored advertising and allocations of newsprint importedat a favorable tariff rate are central to many newspapers’ financial viability.Government-sponsored advertising is the largest source of revenue for many newspapers.In allocating advertising through the Department of Films and Publications,the Government states that it considers circulation of the newspapers, wage boardimplementation, objectivity in reporting, coverage of development activities, and ‘‘attitudetowards the spirit of Bangladesh’s War of Liberation.’’ Commercial organizationsoften are reluctant to advertise in newspapers critical of the Government dueto fear of unspecified governmental or bureaucratic retaliation.Attacks on journalists and newspapers, and efforts to intimidate them by governmentleaders, political party activists, and others frequently occurred. Such attacksby political activists are common during times of political street violence, and somejournalists also were injured in police actions (see Section 1.c.).On January 4, two unidentified persons threw a bomb at the building that housesthe Bangla-language daily Dainik Azadi, causing no major damage; however, a fewminutes later, another bomb blast damaged the managing editor’s car. On January5, the leader of the local Jatiyabadi Chhatra Dal (the student wing of the BNP inMunshiganj), attacked Zakir Hossain Sumon-Srinagar, a correspondent for the‘‘Ajker Kagoj,’’ reportedly because he published a news item criticizing the studentgroup. When Sumon was attacked, a senior journalist, Shafi Uddin Ahmed, tried torescue him and also was attacked by the student group. No one was held accountablein either incident.On January 15, three unidentified persons shot and killed journalist Mir IllaisHossain in Jhenaidah. The journalist, also the leader of a leftist party, allegedly hadVerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
2187received death threats a few weeks before the killing and had requested police protection.Four persons were arrested for their suspected involvement in the murder.By year’s end, charges had not been filed. On February 27, a court in Narayanganjissued an arrest warrant for the editor and other officers of the opposition dailyDinkal on the basis of a complaint lodged by a ruling party M.P., who accused thenewspaper of publishing false, malicious and inaccurate reports about him. OnMarch 8, police officers raided the newspaper’s office, threatening journalists anddamaging furniture. The police withdrew after about 1 hour. On May 20, activistsfrom the ruling party student front, the BCL, assaulted two Dhaka University correspondentsand threatened to kill one of them.On July 16, two men entered the Jessore office of the Bangla-language dailyJanakantha and shot and killed reporter Shamsur Rahman (see Section 1.a.).Rahman had been reporting on the activities of criminal gangs in the southwestpart of the country, and the relationship of those gangs to the national political parties.By September 15, 12 persons had been arrested in connection with the murder.By year’s end, charges had not been filed.According to the <strong>Committee</strong> to Protect Journalists, on October 20, a group of JuboLeague activists, the youth wing of the ruling party, threatened Sohrab Hossain, areporter with the regional ‘‘Loksamaj,’’ after he wrote an article about problems withthe Government’s relief efforts in the flood-ravaged district of Satkhira. On October25, State Minister for Social Welfare Mozammel Hossain (the person in charge ofoverseeing relief operations in Sathkira district) reportedly actively encouraged rulingparty members to attack physically the press by saying ‘‘Wherever you will findjournalists, break their bones.’’ On October 26, a group led by local Awami Leagueleader Nurul Islam ransacked the office of the local daily ‘‘Satkhirar Chitro’’ and assaultedAnisur Rahim, the newspaper’s editor, with knives and a revolver, hospitalizinghim. The attack followed the newspaper’s report on the alleged misappropriationof disaster relief funds (see Section 1.c.). One person was arrested for his involvementin the attack on the editor following the state minister’s remarks, but byyear’s end, no charges had been filed.According to the International Freedom of Expression Exchange, on October 27,Monwar Islam, senior journalist and secretary-general of the Dhaka ReportersUnity (an organization for reporters working in Dhaka) narrowly escaped an abductionattempt, allegedly because of his reporting. By year’s end, no investigation hadbeen conducted, and Islam had fled the country.Virtually all print journalists practice self-censorship to some degree, and are reluctantto criticize politically influential personalities in both the Government andthe opposition; however, some journalists do make such criticism. Many journalistscite fear of possible harassment, retaliation, or physical harm as a reason to avoidsensitive stories. For example, in March the Laxmipur correspondent of a leadingBangla-language newspaper was arrested under the PSA, following a report he publishedon police involvement in mass cheating during high school examinations. Thejournalist was released in November as the Government failed to prove the chargeagainst him in the PSA Tribunal. On May 28, Aminur Rahman Taj, a reporter from‘‘Ajker Kagoj,’’ a leading Bangla-language newspaper, was arrested without a warrantand later was accused of defamation of character. Earlier his paper had publishedan article asserting that the wives of a prominent minister and a senior policeofficial were involved in corrupt practices. After the reporter’s arrest, fellowjournalists strongly protested, and the police threatened to file PSA cases againstthe journalists. The protesting journalists went to the High Court for protection, andno PSA charges were filed against them.In June a leading English-language newspaper ran a story about three sons ofM.P.’s who were allowed to leave the country after being implicated in criminalcases. When the story was quoted in foreign newspapers, an official from the PrimeMinister’s Office pressured the newspaper’s management to fire the author of thestory. The author resigned under pressure a few days later. On August 6, a dailynewspaper in Chittagong issued a notice retracting a story it had run the previousday, implying that a ruling party faction was involved in the July 12 murders ofeight persons in a van (see Section 1.a.). The reporter who authored the originalstory was fired. According to press reports, the General Secretary of a local AwamiLeague chapter declared at a public rally in Laxmipur on October 4, that he would‘‘chop off the hands and legs’’ of journalists who continue to write about him (seeSection 2.a.). He threatened to ‘‘throw opposition activists into the river’’ if theycame out against him, and to take action against the police if they tried to arresthim. An Awami League Presidium member and government minister was ‘‘chiefguest’’ at this Laxmipur rally. Two days later, armed men in Laxmipur injured anewspaper reporter in an attack.VerDate 11-MAY-2000 13:46 Sep 20, 2001 Jkt 071555 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 6601 Sfmt 6621 F:\WORK\COUNTRYR\S71555\71555.035 HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1
- Page 7 and 8: 2163All factions probably hold poli
- Page 9 and 10: 2165and unexploded ordnance. Nevert
- Page 11 and 12: 2167bade non-Muslims from living in
- Page 13 and 14: 2169tion of most of the country. Go
- Page 15 and 16: 2171Women accused of adultery also
- Page 17 and 18: 2173violations of the rights to edu
- Page 19 and 20: 2175paper and firewood, shining sho
- Page 21 and 22: 2177ister made remarks implying tha
- Page 23 and 24: 2179central unit of its student win
- Page 25 and 26: 2181humiliating, painful punishment
- Page 27 and 28: 2183ment of the split verdict in th
- Page 29: 2185The court system has two levels
- Page 33 and 34: 2189ference, but on August 15 (the
- Page 35 and 36: 2191about 125 refugees and asylum s
- Page 37 and 38: 2193Section 5. Discrimination Based
- Page 39 and 40: 2195Indigenous People.—Tribal peo
- Page 41 and 42: 2197ers have the right to strike in
- Page 43 and 44: 2199sites, carry fruit, vegetables,
- Page 45 and 46: 2201based in the Department of Wome
- Page 47 and 48: 2203turn to the country, beat them,
- Page 49 and 50: 2205antinational crimes, including
- Page 51 and 52: 2207order to be eligible for nomina
- Page 53 and 54: 2209Children.—The Government has
- Page 55 and 56: 2211resentatives of the Nepalese Go
- Page 57 and 58: 2213east; continued detention throu
- Page 59 and 60: 2215Accountability remains a seriou
- Page 61 and 62: 2217The Disturbed Areas Act has bee
- Page 63 and 64: 2219lice courtyard in Punjab, appar
- Page 65 and 66: 2221the NLFT was retaliating for a
- Page 67 and 68: 2223The Ministry of Home Affairs re
- Page 69 and 70: 2225One of the suspects subsequentl
- Page 71 and 72: 2227human rights organization. The
- Page 73 and 74: 2229sions would seriously affect hu
- Page 75 and 76: 2231ment. There are effective chann
- Page 77 and 78: 2233three Border Security Force mem
- Page 79 and 80: 2235fice owned by an NGO at Konung
- Page 81 and 82:
2237nated, but many of its members
- Page 83 and 84:
2239ever, no further information wa
- Page 85 and 86:
2241The Tamil Nadu government provi
- Page 87 and 88:
2243According to HRW, on April 20,
- Page 89 and 90:
2245and branded her with hot iron r
- Page 91 and 92:
2247also concerned about the lack o
- Page 93 and 94:
2249rights of the mentally ill and
- Page 95 and 96:
2251from women and children, gather
- Page 97 and 98:
2253The burning of churches continu
- Page 99 and 100:
2255suspected of belonging to an up
- Page 101 and 102:
2257Bonded labor, the result of a p
- Page 103 and 104:
2259ment officials more aware of th
- Page 105 and 106:
2261and ‘‘inhuman treatment.’
- Page 107 and 108:
2263illustration of the consequence
- Page 109 and 110:
2265The Government has permitted pr
- Page 111 and 112:
2267lations governing Internet acce
- Page 113 and 114:
2269Women traditionally have played
- Page 115 and 116:
2271In 1997 the Government for the
- Page 117 and 118:
2273pali Congress Party flags. A bo
- Page 119 and 120:
2275The authorities are more likely
- Page 121 and 122:
2277of the monarch who allegedly ki
- Page 123 and 124:
2279the Government generally does n
- Page 125 and 126:
2281areas along the country’s bor
- Page 127 and 128:
2283groups. Nevertheless, converts
- Page 129 and 130:
2285e. Acceptable Conditions of Wor
- Page 131 and 132:
2287Provisional Constitutional Orde
- Page 133 and 134:
2289assailants killed a leader of t
- Page 135 and 136:
2291ditions, Sindh Inspector Genera
- Page 137 and 138:
2293then another FIR is activated a
- Page 139 and 140:
2295Farooq Sattar was arrested by o
- Page 141 and 142:
2297case pending before any other s
- Page 143 and 144:
2299The Hudood ordinances criminali
- Page 145 and 146:
2301The Penal Code mandates the dea
- Page 147 and 148:
2303cast on television; however, so
- Page 149 and 150:
2305which stipulated a sentence of
- Page 151 and 152:
2307ties at times prevent political
- Page 153 and 154:
2309fair. Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan
- Page 155 and 156:
2311sioners review blasphemy cases
- Page 157 and 158:
2313of Shari’a (see Section 1.c.)
- Page 159 and 160:
2315late head of the Board of Inter
- Page 161 and 162:
2317Courts also may order that chil
- Page 163 and 164:
2319portedly spared the two Muslim
- Page 165 and 166:
2321these services to a few core ar
- Page 167 and 168:
2323centers and 146 larger centers
- Page 169 and 170:
2325administration in Multan approa
- Page 171 and 172:
2327fore their mandates expired, se
- Page 173 and 174:
2329moved many detainees to another
- Page 175 and 176:
2331during the year and in previous
- Page 177 and 178:
2333The LTTE was responsible for a
- Page 179 and 180:
2335persons tried on criminal charg
- Page 181 and 182:
2337the other by the LTTE. The bord
- Page 183 and 184:
2339thor, remained subject to gover
- Page 185 and 186:
2341bombs exploded in the hall of t
- Page 187 and 188:
2343September 29, the Center for Mo
- Page 189 and 190:
2345a strong commitment to children
- Page 191 and 192:
2347All workers, other than civil s
- Page 193:
23491999, the LTTE began a program